Regulatory and Other Measures
January 2010
RBI/2010-11/352DPSS. CO. CHD. No. 1514/03.01.03/
2010-2011 dated January 4, 2011
Enhancing the scope of Speed Clearing
The Chairman and Managing Director/
Chief Executive Officer
All Scheduled Commercial Banks including Regional
Rural Banks/Urban Co-operative Banks/State Cooperative
Banks/District Central Co-operative Banks
A reference is invited to our circulars DPSS.CO.
1808/03.01.02/2007-08 dated May 5, 2008 and
DPSS.CO.No. 517/03.01.02(P)/2008-09 dated September
22, 2008 on implementation of Speed Clearing. Speed
Clearing leverages on the Core Banking Solutions (CBS)
implemented in banks across the country and
facilitates realisation of outstation cheques drawn on
CBS-enabled branches at the local centre itself, thus
obviating the need of such cheques to physically move
to the outstation centre.
2. Roll-out of Speed Clearing is one of the many
initiatives taken by Reserve Bank of India for improving
efficiency in the time-frame for and process of
collection of outstation cheques – the time-frame has
reduced from 7-45 days to 2-3 days, while the monthly
volume of outstation cheques collected through Speed
Clearing has increased significantly to more than 2
million. In terms of coverage, Speed Clearing facility
is available at all the 66 MICR centres and reaches more
than 50,000 bank branches in the country. Efforts are
on to increase the coverage, both in terms of centres
and bank branches.
3. Speed Clearing is currently enabled for cheques
issued by account holders with transaction codes 10
(savings bank), 11 (current account) and 13 (cash
credit). Keeping in view the benefits to customers as
also the infrastructural and processing preparedness
of banks, it has been decided to extend the scope of
Speed Clearing to cover all transaction codes, other
than those relating to government cheques. Banks may exercise usual care and caution while handling such
instruments.
4. The revised instructions will be effective from
February 1, 2011. Please confirm that necessary
arrangements will be in place to ensure compliance.
RBI/2010-11/361DBOD.No.Dir.BC.73/13.03.00/2010-11
dated January 6, 2011
Guidelines on the Base Rate
All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs)
Please refer to our circular DBOD.No.Dir.BC.88/
13.03.00/2009-10 dated April 9, 2010.
2. In partial modification of paragraph 2 (iii) of the
above mentioned circular, we advise that banks are
permitted to change the benchmark and methodology
used in the computation of Base Rate for a further
period of six months, i.e., upto June 30, 2011.
RBI/2010-11/363 UBD. CO. BPD. No. 35/12.05.001/2010-
11 dated January 10, 2011
Opening of bank accounts - salaried
employees
The Chief Executive Officers
All Primary (urban) Co-operative Banks
Please refer to circular UBD. No. DS. PCB. Cir. 17/
13.01.00/2002-03 dated September 18, 2002 and UBD.
PCB. Cir. 30/09.161.00/2004-05 dated December 15,
2004 on Know Your Customer (KYC) norms/Anti-Money
Laundering (AML) standards/Combating of Financing
of Terrorism (CFT)/Obligation of banks under PMLA,
2002. In Annex I to the circular of December 15, 2004
an indicative list of the nature and type of documents/
information that may be relied upon for customer
identification and address verification for opening
bank accounts has been given.
2. It has been brought to our notice that for opening
bank accounts of salaried employees some banks rely
on a certificate/letter issued by the employer as the
only KYC document for the purposes of certification
of identity as well as address proof. Such a practice is
open to misuse and fraught with risk. It is, therefore,
clarified that with a view to containing the risk of fraud,
banks need to rely on such certification only from
corporates and other entities of repute and should be
aware of the competent authority designated by the
concerned employer to issue such certificate/letter.
Further, in addition to the certificate from employer,
banks should insist on at least one of the officially
valid documents as provided in the Prevention of
Money Laundering Rules (viz. passport, driving licence,
PAN Card, Voter’s Identity card etc.) or utility bills for
KYC purposes for opening bank account of salaried
employees of corporates and other entities.
3. These guidelines are issued under Section 35 A
of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (AACS) and Rule 7
of Prevention of Money-Laundering (Maintenance of
Records of the Nature and Value of Transactions, the
Procedure and Manner of Maintaining and Time for
Furnishing Information and Verification and
Maintenance of Records of the Identity of the Clients
of the Banking Companies, Financial Institutions and
Intermediaries) Rules, 2005. Any contravention thereof
or non-compliance shall attract penalties under the
Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (AACS).
RBI/2010-11/368 DBS.CO.PPD.BC.No. 5/11.01.005/2010-
11 dated January 14, 2011
End Use of Funds - Monitoring
The Chairman/Chief Executives Officer
All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs)
The Reserve Bank, as a part of ongoing
supervision, had undertaken an assessment of the
practices in vogue at certain banks for ensuring the
end-use of funds. The review revealed that the
expected level of due diligence had not been exercised
in some cases facilitating diversion of funds by the
borrowers. The shortcomings, amongst others,
included, crediting of term loan disbursements to the current/cash credit accounts of borrowers and
utilisation thereof for day-to-day operations, as also,
exclusive reliance on Chartered Accountants’
certification both in regard to infusion of promoters'
contribution and deployment of banks' funds.
2. In the context of the above, it is advised that the
efficacy of the existing machinery in your bank for postsanction
supervision and follow-up of advances may
please be evaluated and made robust, wherever
considered necessary. Illustratively, the systems and
procedures may broadly include the following :
i. meaningful scrutiny of the periodical
progress reports and operating/financial
statements of the borrowers;
ii. regular visits to the assisted units and
inspection of securities charged/
hypothecated to the banks;
iii. periodical scrutiny of the books of accounts
of the borrowers;
iv. introduction of stock audits depending upon
the extent of exposure;
v. obtention of certificates from the borrowers
that the funds have been utilised for the
purposes approved and in case of incorrect
certification, initiation of prompt action as
may be warranted, which may include
withdrawal of the facilities sanctioned and
legal recourse as well. In case a specific
certification regarding diversion/siphoning
of funds is desired from the auditors of the
borrowers, a separate mandate may be
awarded to them and appropriate covenants
incorporated in the loan agreements; and
vi. examination of all aspects of diversion of
funds during internal audit/inspection of the
branches and at the time of periodical
reviews.
3. As would be appreciated, effective monitoring of
the end-use of funds lent is of critical importance in
safeguarding a bank’s interest. Further, this would also
act as a deterrent for borrowers to misuse the credit
facilities sanctioned, and in the process, help build a
healthy credit culture in the Indian banking system.
RBI/2010-11/376DBOD.BP.BC.No. 74/21.04.132/2010-11
dated January 19, 2011
Credit Support to Micro Finance
Institutions (MFIs)
The Chairman and Managing Directors/Chief Executive
Officers of All Scheduled Commercial Banks (Excluding
RRBs & LABs)
The Reserve Bank of India had held discussions
with select banks on December 22, 2010 to get an
assessment regarding the ground level situation in the
microfinance sector in Andhra Pradesh and other States
and the need for any interim measures. The banks
informed that collections by MFIs in Andhra Pradesh
had deteriorated considerably and there were some
incipient signs of contagion spreading to other States.
Subsequently, Indian Bankers’ Association (IBA) based
on the feedback received by them from banks had come
up with a proposal that there is a need for extending
certain relaxations in the restructuring guidelines of
the Reserve Bank for the MFI sector. They had observed
that bank loans to MFIs are mostly unsecured but to
avail of the regulatory asset classification benefits
under the present restructuring guidelines of the
Reserve Bank, the accounts have to be fully secured.
As far as the banks’ exposures to MFIs were concerned,
the banks stressed on the need to work out an interim
arrangement involving, inter alia, rescheduling of
exposures to MFIs subject to certain covenants such
as MFIs agreeing to reduce their leverage and growth
projections.
2. In terms of paragraph 6.2.2 of our circular
DBOD.No.BP.BC.No.37/21.04.132/2008-09 dated August
27, 2008 on ‘Prudential Guidelines on Restructuring
of Advances by Banks’, special regulatory asset
classification benefits are available to restructured
accounts provided, inter alia, the dues to the banks
are fully secured. Considering the fact that the current
problems afflicting the Micro Finance Institutions
(MFIs) sector are not necessarily on account of any
credit weakness per-se but are mainly due to
environmental factors, it has been decided that the
special regulatory asset classification benefit could be
extended to restructured MFI accounts, which are
standard at the time of restructuring, even if they are
not fully secured. This relaxation is granted purely as a temporary measure and would be applicable to
Standard MFI accounts restructured by banks up to
March 31, 2011. The other conditions specified in the
above mentioned circular for getting the special asset
classification benefits would remain unchanged. It is
advised that a consortium approach for restructuring
may be preferred and all the banks financing a MFI
unit should come together and decide on the course
of action to be pursued for that unit.
3. The above measure is likely to impart some
liquidity support to MFIs and facilitate a ‘holding on’
operation for some time till the Malegam Committee
submits its report and measures are taken to bring
about long term and structural changes in the
functioning of MFIs. Banks are advised that they should
endeavour to recycle the collections to MFIs so as to
ensure that the intended ‘holding on’ operation is
successful.
RBI/2010-11/377 DPSS.CO.CHD.No. 1671/03.06.01/
2010-11 dated January 19, 2011
The Chairman and Managing Director/
Chief Executive Officer
All Scheduled Commercial Banks includin RRBs/UCBs/
State Co-operative Banks/District Central Co-operative
Banks
Review of Service Charges for Cheque
Collection – Local, Outstation and
Speed Clearing
Given the advantages of using electronic modes
for initiating payments, especially for large value
transactions, Reserve Bank of India has been taking
concerted steps towards increasing the acceptability,
reach and efficiency of electronic transactions. Paperbased
instruments, however, continue to account for
a significant volume of payments in the country.
Reserve Bank has, therefore, been encouraging the use
of technology and the core-banking infrastructure of
the banking system for reducing the clearing
cycle and movement of cheques, both local and
outstation.
2. In this regard, attention of banks is invited to our
circulars DPSS.CO.No.611/03.01.03(P)/2008-09 dated October 8, 2008 and DPSS.CO.No.829/03.01.03(SC)/
2008-09 dated November 17, 2008 in terms of which,
charges for Outstation Cheque Collection as also
cheques collected under the Speed Clearing
arrangement were mandated by the Reserve Bank for
different value bands.
3. On a review of the developments in this regard,
it has been decided to revise the charges structure.
While Reserve Bank would continue to mandate
charges for smaller value transactions relating to
savings account customers, greater freedom is being
accorded to banks to determine charges for larger value
transactions, subject to such charges being levied by
the banks in a fair and transparent manner. These
measures are expected to hasten the migration of
transactions to electronic mode.
4. Accordingly, the following service charge structure
will come into effect from April 1, 2011.
(a) Service (Processing) Charges for Local Clearing (by
Clearing Houses from Member Banks) –
System |
Existing (`) |
Revised (`) |
Presenting Bank |
Drawee Bank |
Presenting Bank |
Drawee Bank |
Clearing at MICR-CPCs |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
1.50 |
Cheque Truncation |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
1.00 |
(b) Service Charges for Outstation Cheque
Collection–
Existing (`) |
Revised (`) |
Value |
Service charge from all custo- mers |
Value |
Service charge from Savings a/c customers |
Up to and including 10,000 |
50 |
Up to and including 5,000 |
25^ |
Above 5,000 and up to and including 10,000 |
50*^ |
Above 10,000 and up to and including 1,00,000 |
100 |
Above 10,000 and up to and including 1,00,000 |
100*^ |
Above 1,00,000 |
150 |
Above 1,00,000 |
Left to the banks to decide |
* : No change.
^ : All inclusive maximum amount chargeable by banks to the customers. |
(c) Service Charges for Cheque Collection under
Speed Clearing (by Collecting Banks from
customers) –
Existing (`) |
Revised (`) |
Value |
Service charge from all customers |
Value |
Service charge from Savings a/c customers |
Up to and including 1,00,000 |
Nil |
Up to and including 1,00,000 |
Nil* |
Above 1,00,000 |
150 |
Above 1,00,000 |
Left to the banks to decide |
* No change. |
5. Banks are free to fix charges for collection of
instruments for credit to other types of accounts.
6. While fixing service charges not mandated herein,
banks may note the following –
(a) The service charge structure put in place by the
bank should have the approval of the Board of
Directors.
(b) Charges fixed should be reasonable and computed
on a cost-plus-basis and not as an arbitrary
percentage of the value of the instrument.
The service charges-structure should not be
open-ended and should clearly specify the
maximum charges that would be levied on
customers including charges if any, payable to
other banks.
(c) While sharing service charges, banks may be
guided by the provisions of circular CIR/RB-I/CCP/
64 dated April 8, 2010 issued by the Indian Banks'
Association.
(d) Banks may note to ensure that collection charges
fixed for instruments of any value is lower under
Speed Clearing vis-a-vis Outstation Cheque
Collection so as to encourage the use of Speed
Clearing.
(e) The service charges mandated/fixed by banks are
inclusive of all charges (postal, courier, handling,
etc.) other than service tax.
7. Banks shall use electronic modes like RTGS/NEFT
to remit clearing proceeds to the collecting bank branch
availing of Outstation Cheque Collection facility.
8. These directions are issued by the Reserve Bank
of India in exercise of the powers conferred by Section
18 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007
(Act 51 of 2007).
RBI/2010-11/385 DBOD.FID.FIC.No.10 /01.02.00/2010-
11 dated January 25, 2011
The CEOs of select All-India Term Lending and
Refinancing Institutions (Exim Bank, NABARD, NHB
and SIDBI)
Prudential Guidelines on Restructuring of
Advances by select All-India Financial
Institutions (AIFIs) : Credit Support to
MFIs
In continuation of our letter DBOD.No.FID.FIC.6/
01.02.00/2010-11 dated October 14, 2010 on the
captioned subject, please find enclosed
DBOD.BP.BC.No. 74/21.04.132/2010-11 dated January
19, 2011 on ‘Credit Support to Micro Finance
Institutions ( MFIs)’ issued to scheduled commercial
banks. In this connection, it is advised that these
guidelines, shall apply mutatis mutandis to the select
All-India Financial Institutions (AIFIs)
2. However, certain activities are generally not
undertaken by FIs, such as extending working capital,
overdrafts and personal loans, etc. The provision of
the circular relating to such activities shall not be
applicable to the AIFIs.
RBI/2010-11/389 DBOD.AML.No. 77/14.01.001/2010-11
dated January 27, 2011
Opening of “Small Account”
The Chairmen/CEOs of all Scheduled Commercial
Banks (Excluding RRBs)/Local Area Banks/All India
Financial Institutions
Please find enclosed a copy of the Government
of India, Notification No. 14/2010/F.No.6/2/2007-E.S.
dated December 16, 2010, amending the Prevention
of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records of the
Nature and Value of Transactions, the Procedure and
Manner of Maintaining and Time for Furnishing
Information and Verification and Maintenance of
Records of the Identity of the Clients of the Banking
Companies, Financial Institutions and Intermediaries)
Rules, 2005.
A. Small Accounts
2. In terms of Rule 2 clause (fb) of the Notification
‘small account’ means a savings account in a banking
company where
(i) the aggregate of all credits in a financial year
does not exceed rupees one lakh;
(ii) the aggregate of all withdrawals and transfers
in a month does not exceed rupees ten
thousand; and
(iii) the balance at any point of time does not
exceed rupees fifty thousand .
3. Rule (2A) of the Notification lays down the
detailed procedure for opening ‘small accounts’.
Banks are advised to ensure adherence to the
procedure provided in the Rules for opening of small
accounts.
B. Officially Valid Documents
4. The Notification has also expanded the definition
of ‘officially valid document’ as contained in clause
(d) of Rule 2(1)of the PML Rules to include job card
issued by NREGA duly signed by an officer of the State
Government or the letters issued by the Unique
Identification Authority of India containing details of
name, address and Aadhaar number.
5. It is further advised that where a bank has relied
exclusively on any of these two documents, viz. NREGA
job card or Aadhaar letter, as complete KYC document
for opening of an account (ref. paragraph 2.4 (f) of the
Master circular dated July 1,2010) the bank account so
opened will also be subjected to all conditions and
limitations prescribed for small account in the
Notification.
6. Accordingly, all accounts opened in terms of
procedure prescribed in Rule 2A of the Notification
enclosed and all other accounts opened ONLY on the
basis of NREGA card or Aadhaar letter should be
treated as ‘small accounts’ subject to the conditions
stipulated in clause (i) to (v) of the sub-rule (2A) of
Rule 9.
RBI/2010-11/390 DBOD.No.BL.BC. 78/22.01.001/2010-
11 dated January 27, 2011 7 Magha, 1932 ( Saka)
Section 23 of the Banking Regulation
Act, 1949 Relaxations in Branch
Authorisation Policy
All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs)
In terms of Circular DBOD.No.BL.BC. 65/
22.01.001/2009-10 dated December 1, 2009, general
permission was granted to domestic scheduled
commercial banks (other than RRBs) to open branches
in Tier-3 to Tier-6 centres (with population upto
49,999 as per Census 2001) and in rural, semi-urban
and urban centres in the North-Eastern States and
Sikkim, subject to reporting.
2. We have been receiving queries from banks
regarding applicability of distance criteria envisaged
in paragraph 6.3(b) of the Master Circular on Branch
Authorisation DBOD.No. BL.BC. 8/22.01.001/2010-11
dated July 1, 2010 for opening of branches under
general permission. It is clarified that conditions
mentioned at paragraph 6.3 (b) of the Master Circular
referred to above is not applicable to opening of
branches under general permission.
3. Further, it has been decided to grant general
permission to domestic scheduled commercial banks
(other than RRBs) to open Administrative Offices and
Central Processing Centres (CPC)/service branches in
Tier- 3 to Tier- 6 centres (with population upto 49,999
as per census 2001) and in rural, semi urban and urban
centres in the North Eastern States and Sikkim, subject
to reporting. Administrative Office (Controlling
Offices) would be carrying out administrative work.
Central Processing Centres (CPCs)/Service branches
would exclusively attend to back office functions.
These Central Processing Centres (CPCs)/Service
branches should not have direct interface with
customers.
4. Banks should ensure that the centres where the
branches are opened under general permission are not
the outgrowth (locality developed around bigger centre)
of a bigger centre. Department of Statistics and
Information Management (DSIM) has clarified that
outgrowth of a bigger centre would have the same
population group classification as that of the bigger
centre.
5. Details of Administrative Offices and Central
Processing Centres (CPC)/service branches opened by
banks under general permission should be reported
to the Reserve Bank in terms of the existing reporting
system envisaged in paragraph 19 of the Master circular
on Branch Authorisation dated July 1, 2010.
RBI/2010-11/391 DNBS.CC.PD.No.208/03.10.01/2010-11
dated January 27, 2011
Services to Persons with Disability –
Training Programme for Employees
All NBFCs
In terms of DNBS.CC.PD.No. 191/03.10.01/2010-
11 dated July 27, 2010, NBFCs were advised that there
shall be no discrimination in extending products and
facilities including loan facilities to the physically/
visually challenged applicants on grounds of disability
and that they may also advise their branches to render
all possible assistance to such persons for availing of
the various business facilities.
2. In continuation to the above, NBFCs are advised
that they may include a suitable module containing
the rights of persons with disabilities guaranteed to
them by the law and international conventions, in all
the training programmes conducted for their
employees at all levels. Further, NBFCs may ensure
redressal of grievances of persons with disabilities
under the Grievance Redressal Mechanism already set
up by them.
RBI/2010-11/393 RPCD.CO.Plan.BC. 49/04.09.01/2010-
11 dated January 28, 2011
Annual Financial Inspection – Priority
Sector Loans – Mis-classification by Banks
The Chairman/Managing Director/
Chief Executive Officer
All scheduled commercial banks (excluding Regional
Rural Banks)
The Annual Financial Inspection conducted
by the Department of Banking Supervision, Reserve
Bank of India, inter-alia, reports cases of
misclassification of loans under priority sector and/
or its sub-sectors.
2. It has been decided that henceforth the amount
of loans wrongly classified under priority
sector identified and reported by Principal
Inspecting Officers (PIOs) during Annual Financial
Inspection of banks will be taken into account for
arriving at the shortfall under priority sector lending
targets.
3. Accordingly, to begin with, such misclassifications
reported during the current year will be added to the
shortfall reported by banks as on the last reporting
Friday of following year, for allocation to various
funds.
4. Besides, it has also been reported that typically
when banks buy loans from intermediaries like MFI/
NBFCs given to eligible priority sector borrowers, they
reckon the present value of the loans arrived at by
discounting at their rate of lending which is typically
much lower than the actual rate charged to end–
borrowers by such intermediaries. This has the effect
of overstating the actual amount of priority sector loans
to the extent of premium paid by banks to such
intermediaries. Banks must, therefore, report the
nominal amount actually disbursed to end-priority
sector borrowers and not the premium-embedded
amount paid to the intermediaries. |