| (Per cent) | | State | Market Borrowings | Loans from Centre | Special Securities issued to NSSF | Loans from LIC, NABARD, NCDC, SBI and other Banks | Provident Funds, etc. | Reserve Funds | Deposits and Advances | Suspense and Miscellaneous | Remittances | Others | Overall Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) | Gross Fiscal Surplus (-)/ Deficit (+) (Col.2 to 12) | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | | I. Non-Special Category | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1. Andhra Pradesh | 75.4 | -2.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 5.7 | 0.2 | 39.2 | -0.6 | 2.8 | -2.2 | -22.1 | 100.0 | | 2. Bihar | 84.8 | 1.0 | 16.8 | 4.5 | -0.6 | -3.3 | 30.9 | -4.8 | 0.1 | 11.2 | -40.5 | 100.0 | | 3. Chhattisgarh | 85.7 | -0.3 | 7.1 | 9.7 | 9.4 | 7.2 | -1.3 | 0.6 | -0.2 | 15.1 | -33.0 | 100.0 | | 4. Goa | 86.7 | 5.7 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 7.6 | 16.9 | -4.9 | -12.5 | -6.3 | -5.4 | 8.9 | 100.0 | | 5. Gujarat | 63.3 | -1.8 | 6.5 | 36.6 | 2.1 | -6.4 | 10.8 | 1.2 | 1.2 | -29.5 | 15.9 | 100.0 | | 6. Haryana | 41.8 | -0.3 | 3.2 | -0.6 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | -0.1 | 53.6 | -2.5 | 100.0 | | 7. Jharkhand | 41.3 | – | 5.0 | 3.3 | -1.4 | 0.1 | 18.3 | 0.1 | – | 50.2 | -17.0 | 100.0 | | 8. Karnataka | 77.8 | 1.7 | 8.2 | 0.9 | 10.9 | -11.8 | 1.5 | 5.2 | -0.1 | – | 5.9 | 100.0 | | 9. Kerala | 72.3 | 1.0 | 4.1 | -0.4 | 46.8 | -0.3 | -18.4 | 4.3 | -0.5 | -0.6 | -8.2 | 100.0 | | 10. Madhya Pradesh | 92.4 | 2.9 | 6.6 | 8.4 | 7.3 | 12.3 | 4.1 | 10.4 | -2.5 | -2.7 | -39.1 | 100.0 | | 11. Maharashtra | 102.0 | -1.1 | -1.0 | -0.8 | 4.3 | -1.1 | 9.8 | -3.1 | -0.8 | -0.6 | -7.5 | 100.0 | | 12. Odisha | 50.5 | 1.6 | 22.3 | 24.6 | 26.0 | 4.0 | 3.3 | 0.4 | -0.7 | -2.8 | -29.1 | 100.0 | | 13. Punjab | 53.0 | -0.3 | 9.1 | 1.0 | 6.4 | -3.0 | 0.7 | -0.2 | – | 31.6 | 1.8 | 100.0 | | 14. Rajasthan | 21.9 | 1.9 | -0.1 | 1.8 | 5.2 | 0.3 | 3.6 | 0.1 | – | 63.4 | 2.0 | 100.0 | | 15. Tamil Nadu | 84.7 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 5.0 | – | 0.3 | -2.8 | -0.6 | -0.1 | 7.8 | 100.0 | | 16. Telangana | 68.8 | 4.2 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 4.7 | 2.1 | 12.0 | 7.6 | -0.7 | -0.1 | -2.9 | 100.0 | | 17. Uttar Pradesh | 43.3 | -1.4 | 7.4 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 4.4 | -2.6 | -1.2 | -0.3 | 50.1 | -3.3 | 100.0 | | 18. West Bengal | 99.7 | -0.8 | 20.7 | -0.1 | 3.5 | -6.0 | 16.3 | -5.6 | -8.3 | 2.8 | -22.3 | 100.0 | | II. Special Category | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1. Arunachal Pradesh | -68.6 | 14.0 | -211.3 | -8.9 | -171.7 | -105.5 | -107.5 | 576.7 | -916.1 | 661.9 | 436.8 | 100.0 | | 2. Assam | -63.1 | 2.8 | -50.3 | -6.8 | -28.6 | -7.7 | 33.5 | 7.6 | 1.6 | – | 211.0 | 100.0 | | 3. Himachal Pradesh | 76.9 | -1.0 | 45.1 | 8.1 | 33.2 | -0.4 | 5.3 | -1.2 | 6.8 | -3.6 | -69.1 | 100.0 | | 4. Jammu and Kashmir | 22.6 | -1.2 | 5.8 | -3.2 | 35.8 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 4.3 | -2.5 | 26.3 | 8.0 | 100.0 | | 5. Manipur | 91.3 | -12.9 | 5.4 | 14.1 | 17.8 | -1.3 | 34.3 | -0.1 | -42.4 | -11.4 | 5.2 | 100.0 | | 6. Meghalaya | 82.9 | -3.2 | 10.8 | 1.5 | 23.7 | 1.2 | -42.3 | -10.0 | -0.5 | -1.9 | 37.8 | 100.0 | | 7. Mizoram | -14.6 | 4.1 | -2.8 | 8.6 | -92.8 | 1.3 | 129.1 | 9.0 | 8.1 | 1.6 | 48.4 | 100.0 | | 8. Nagaland | 100.1 | -3.6 | 4.4 | -6.5 | 2.0 | – | -12.6 | 1.9 | 12.4 | -2.2 | 4.2 | 100.0 | | 9. Sikkim | 88.7 | -1.4 | 4.5 | -2.2 | 7.2 | -7.4 | 4.2 | 18.5 | 15.9 | -1.3 | -26.6 | 100.0 | | 10. Tripura | 21.5 | -1.6 | 10.7 | 10.5 | 20.6 | -3.3 | 6.7 | -1.3 | -0.7 | -0.4 | 37.2 | 100.0 | | 11. Uttarakhand | 43.6 | 1.1 | 24.0 | 9.7 | 7.8 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 6.3 | 0.6 | -3.2 | 5.6 | 100.0 | | All States | 61.4 | 0.2 | 6.4 | 3.9 | 7.9 | 0.1 | 5.5 | – | -0.1 | 22.0 | -7.3 | 100.0 | | Memo item: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1. NCT Delhi | – | -60.5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.8 | 159.8 | 100.0 | | 2. Puducherry | 70.8 | -18.4 | – | 5.8 | 6.2 | -2.7 | 20.3 | -13.4 | -1.2 | 31.8 | 0.7 | 100.0 | '–' : Nil/Negligible.
Note: (1) Same as in Appendix Table 9.
(2) The detailed break-up of ‘Discharge of Internal Debt’ was not available for Arunachal Pradesh and the same has been included under ‘Others’. The financing items under ‘Internal Debt’ for the state is, therefore, not on a net basis except ‘Others’.
(3) ‘Others’ include Loans from other institutions, compensation bonds appropriation to contingency fund, inter-state settlement and contingency fund.
(4) In case of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam and Mizoram the contribution of respective component needs to be seen in light of surplus GFD; for both these states the positive sign of a component represent positive contribution whereas a negative sign represent a negative contribution in reduction of GFD.
Source: Budget documents of the state governments, CAG for 2015-16 in respect of Jammu & Kashmir. | |