This article presents the findings of Inflation
Expectations Survey of Households conducted in the
January–March 2011 quarter, the 23rd round in the
series. The survey captures the inflation expectations of
4,000 urban households across 12 cities for the next threemonth
(April-June 2011) and for the next one-year (April
2011-March 2012).
The inflation rates from this survey represent the
inflation expectations of 4,000 urban households based on
their individual consumption baskets and, hence, these rates
are not to be considered as predictors of any official measure
of inflation. The households’ inflation expectations provide
useful directional information on near-term inflationary
pressures and also supplement other economic indicators to
get a better indication of future inflation. The survey results
are those of the respondents and not necessarily shared by
the Reserve Bank of India.
The current round of the survey shows that inflation
expectations of households for the next three-month and
for next one-year ahead are lower at 11.9 per cent and
12.7 per cent respectively, from 12.4 per cent and 13.1
per cent assessed during the earlier round of survey. The
survey findings, however, indicate that households expect
inflation to rise further by 40 and 120 basis points during
next three-month and next one-year, respectively, from the
perceived current rate of 11.5 per cent. Households’
expectations of general price rise were mainly influenced
by movements in food prices. The percentage of respondents
expecting price rise has gone down for all product groups
(viz., general prices, food products, non-food, household
durables, housing and services). On category-wise inflation
expectations, daily-wage workers and housewives expected
higher inflation rates compared to other categories. Across
the cities, Bangalore registered the highest inflation
expectations and Patna registered the lowest expectations.
I. Introduction
Reserve Bank of India has been conducting
Inflation Expectations Survey of Households (IESH) on
a quarterly basis, since September 2005. The survey elicits qualitative responses on expected price changes
(general prices as well as prices of specific product
groups) in the next three-month as well as in the next
one-year and quantitative responses on current,
three-month ahead and one-year ahead inflations.
While inflation affects purchasing power, inflation
expectations affect people’s behavior in ways that have
a long-term economic impact. Inflation expectations
of households are subjective assessments and are based
on their individual consumption baskets and,
therefore, may be different from the official inflation
numbers released periodically by the government.
II. Data Coverage & Methodology
The single-page survey schedule (Annex) designed
for the IESH has been organised into six blocks. The
first block seeks respondents’ particulars including
name, contact details, gender, age and occupation
(category). The second and third blocks seek productwise
price expectations for three-month ahead and
one-year ahead, respectively. The fourth block assesses
the respondents’ feedback on RBI’s action to control
inflation. The fifth block collects the rate of inflation
of the respondent for three time points – current, threemonth
ahead and one-year ahead. The last block which
has been added since the last survey round (October-
December 2010) captures the information on the
amount paid by the respondents for the purchase of
major food items, viz., Milk (per litre), Wheat-atta
(per kg), Rice (per kg), Chana dal (per kg) and Tur dal
(per kg) during last one month.
II.1 Data Coverage
The Reserve Bank conducts this survey in 12 cities
on a quarterly basis. The major metropolitan cities, viz.,
Delhi, Kolkata, Mumbai and Chennai are represented
by 500 households each, while another eight cities, viz.,
Jaipur, Lucknow, Bhopal, Ahmedabad, Patna, Guwahati,
Bangalore and Hyderabad are represented by 250
households each. The respondents are well spread across the cities to provide a good geographical
coverage. The male and female respondents in the
group are usually in the ratio of 3:2. The category-wise
representation of the respondents is presented in
Table 1. The sample coverage is nearly as per the target
in all rounds.
Table 1: Respondents’ Profile (Category) – Share in Total Sample |
Category of Respondents |
Share in Total (%) |
Target Share (%) |
Housewives |
29.4 |
30.0 |
Self-Employed |
21.1 |
20.0 |
Other Employees |
15.4 |
15.0 |
Financial Sector Employees |
9.8 |
10.0 |
Retired Persons |
9.1 |
10.0 |
Daily Workers |
9.6 |
10.0 |
Other categories |
5.8 |
5.0 |
Total |
100 |
100 |
Note: Sample proportion above is for the March 2011 survey |
II. 2 Information collected
The price expectations are sought for general
prices and for five product groups (food products, nonfood
products, household durables, housing and
services). The general price comprises prices of all the
product groups taken together. The options for
responses are (i) price increase more than current rate,
(ii) price increase similar to current rate, (iii) price
increase lower than current rate, (iv) no change in
prices and (v) decline in prices. The first three of the
five options pertain to the respondents’ expectations on the rate of future price increase compared to the
current rate. These expectations are sought from the
respondents for three-month ahead as well as one-year
ahead period. The inflation expectations of the
respondents that represent the year-on-year changes
in prices are collected through Block 5. The inflation
rates are collected in intervals – the lowest being ‘less
than 1 per cent’ and the highest being ’16 per cent and
above’ with 100 basis point size for all intermediate
classes. The information on the respondents’
awareness on RBI’s action to control inflation as well
as the impact of RBI’s action on inflation is also
obtained in Block 4 from the 21st survey round
(September 2010). In the last round (December 2010),
a new question was added in Block 6 to capture the
information on the amount paid by the respondents
for the purchase of major food items, viz.,
Milk (per litre), Wheat-atta (per kg), Rice (per kg), Chana
dal (per kg) and Tur dal (per kg) during the last one
month.
III. Survey Results
III.1 General Price Expectations
The survey results depict that the percentage of
respondents expecting increase in general prices for
both three-month ahead and one-year ahead has came
down in the latest round. The proportion of
respondents in each of these response categories in the last 10 rounds is presented in Table 2. The
percentage of respondents expecting price increase
over three-month ahead period declined to 96.0 per
cent from 98.6 per cent in the previous round (October-
December 2010). Similarly, the percentage of
respondents expecting general price increase over
one-year ahead period also declined to 96.1 per cent
from 98.9 per cent in the previous round. The
proportion of respondents who expect this price
increase to be ‘higher than current rate’ has also fallen.
Table 2: General Price Expectations |
Round No./survey period → |
Three-month ahead (percentage of respondents) |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
| |
Dec-08 |
Mar-09 |
Jun-09 |
Sep-09 |
Dec-09 |
Mar-10 |
Jun-10 |
Sep-10 |
Dec-10 |
Mar-11 |
Prices will increase |
89.8 |
92.0 |
93.1 |
95.8 |
97.4 |
95.7 |
95.3 |
96.5 |
98.6 |
96.0 |
Price increase more than current rate |
52.9 |
54.9 |
63.5 |
72.2 |
74.6 |
66.9 |
72.7 |
72.2 |
74.3 |
72.9 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
20.1 |
22.4 |
20.7 |
18.4 |
16.6 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
21.0 |
22.0 |
20.4 |
Price increase less than current rate |
16.8 |
14.8 |
8.9 |
5.1 |
6.2 |
8.8 |
2.6 |
3.3 |
2.3 |
2.7 |
No change in prices |
5.7 |
6.9 |
6.1 |
3.7 |
2.4 |
3.4 |
4.2 |
2.9 |
1.1 |
3.5 |
Decline in price |
4.5 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
Options |
One-year Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
Prices will increase |
90.6 |
95.6 |
93.7 |
96.3 |
96.3 |
96.5 |
95.2 |
95.6 |
98.9 |
96.1 |
Price increase more than current rate |
59.7 |
64.7 |
62.8 |
69.5 |
68.2 |
62.8 |
70.8 |
70.4 |
77.4 |
73.4 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
18.0 |
15.9 |
18.5 |
17.3 |
15.2 |
19.8 |
18.7 |
19.7 |
17.9 |
18.6 |
Price increase less than current rate |
12.9 |
15.0 |
12.4 |
9.5 |
12.9 |
13.9 |
5.7 |
5.6 |
3.6 |
4.2 |
No change in prices |
3.1 |
3.3 |
5.3 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
2.6 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
0.9 |
3.5 |
Decline in price |
6.3 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
III. 2 Product Group-wise Price Expectations
The product group-wise price expectations are
given in Statement I. For three-month ahead and
one-year ahead price expectations, the percentages of
respondents expecting price rise have gone down for
all product groups, viz., food products, non-food
products, household durables, housing and services.
In case of food products, the percentage of households
expecting the price increase more than the current rate
has gone down substantially whereas the proportion
of those expecting price increase similar to the current
rate has decreased marginally as compared to the
previous survey round.
III. 3 Coherence between General Prices and
Product groups’ Prices
General price expectations are influenced by the
price expectations in respect of various product groups.
However, price expectations of certain product groups
can influence the General Price expectations more than other products. Therefore, a measure of coherence
between General Prices and prices of various product
groups was derived based on the total percentages of
respondents who expect similar movements in General
Price and those of various product groups. This degree
of coherence between General Prices and prices of
various product groups for three-month ahead and
one-year ahead is depicted in Table 3 and Table 4.
The General Price expectations are more in tune
with Food Price expectations, as compared to other
product groups. This association was lowest for
Household Durables. This indicates that respondents
assign relatively higher priority to food prices when
they think about the price movements in general. In
the current round of the survey, it is observed that
about 85.5 per cent and 89.8 per cent of the
respondents are seen to have been influenced by food
prices for arriving at three-month ahead and one-year
ahead General Price expectations, respectively. There
has been an increase in the share of respondents
perceiving Household durables as an influencing factor
for their General Price expectations.
Table 3: Percentage of Respondents Expecting General Price Movements in Coherence with Movements in Price Expectations of Various Product Groups : Three-month Ahead |
(percentage of respondents) |
Round No. |
Survey Quarter |
Food |
Non- Food |
House- hold Durables |
Housing |
Cost of Services |
14 |
Dec-08 |
88.9 |
85.1 |
60.9 |
69.0 |
70.3 |
15 |
Mar-09 |
85.4 |
85.3 |
62.8 |
73.0 |
73.9 |
16 |
Jun-09 |
87.0 |
79.3 |
59.4 |
72.0 |
76.7 |
17 |
Sep-09 |
89.1 |
81.3 |
56.5 |
78.1 |
82.2 |
18 |
Dec-09 |
88.3 |
83.6 |
62.3 |
82.7 |
79.3 |
19 |
Mar-10 |
87.4 |
81.4 |
66.5 |
78.1 |
76.6 |
20 |
Jun-10 |
89.9 |
82.4 |
63.6 |
80.2 |
80.8 |
21 |
Sep-10 |
91.4 |
86.1 |
64.8 |
79.2 |
76.7 |
22 |
Dec-10 |
92.3 |
77.3 |
58.9 |
82.5 |
76.6 |
23 |
Mar-11 |
85.5 |
78.9 |
62.5 |
82.5 |
76.4 |
Table 4: Percentage of Respondents Expecting General Price Movements in Coherence with Movements in Price Expectations of Various Product Groups: One-year Ahead |
(percentage of respondents) |
Round No. |
Survey Quarter |
Food |
Non- Food |
House- hold Durables |
Housing |
Cost of Services |
14 |
Dec-08 |
91.8 |
88.3 |
63.4 |
70.9 |
74.4 |
15 |
Mar-09 |
89.1 |
88.1 |
65.3 |
79.4 |
74.8 |
16 |
Jun-09 |
89.2 |
82.2 |
61.4 |
76.8 |
78.5 |
17 |
Sep-09 |
91.9 |
85.8 |
65.0 |
78.9 |
82.3 |
18 |
Dec-09 |
91.1 |
88.4 |
69.0 |
82.8 |
79.3 |
19 |
Mar-10 |
89.9 |
83.6 |
67.3 |
79.7 |
76.2 |
20 |
Jun-10 |
91.7 |
83.2 |
67.2 |
79.4 |
81.1 |
21 |
Sep-10 |
93.4 |
88.0 |
66.8 |
81.0 |
76.3 |
22 |
Dec-10 |
91.7 |
83.5 |
62.4 |
83.0 |
78.8 |
23 |
Mar-11 |
89.8 |
81.6 |
68.1 |
82.4 |
80.6 |
III. 4. Inflation expectations
The perception of current inflation rate and
expectations of three-month ahead and one-year ahead
inflation since Round 5 (September 2006) are shown
in Table 5 and Chart 1. It represents the average
inflation rate of 4000 respondents. The current round
of the survey shows that inflation expectations of households for the next three-month and for next
one-year ahead are lower at 11.9 per cent and 12.7 per
cent, respectively, from 12.4 per cent and 13.1 per cent
assessed during the earlier round of survey. The
perception of current inflation, the three-month ahead
and one-year ahead inflation expectations in the
current survey round have decreased by 30, 50 and 40
basis points, respectively, as compared to the corresponding perceptions in the previous round. The
movement of inflation expectations shows that the
future inflation expectations are usually higher than
the perception of current inflation. These inflation
expectations provide useful inputs on directional
movements of future inflation. However, these are not
to be treated as forecast of any official measure of
inflation.
It may be seen from Chart 1 that the short term
(three-month ahead) expectations of inflation lie
between current inflation and long-term (one-year
ahead) inflation expectations.
Table 5: Household Inflation Expectations Current, Three-month Ahead and One-year Ahead |
Survey Quarter |
Expectation period |
Current |
Three-month Ahead |
One-year Ahead |
Sep-06 |
Oct-Dec06 |
4.7 |
4.8 |
5.6 |
Dec-06 |
Jan-Mar07 |
5.1 |
5.2 |
5.8 |
Mar-07 |
Apr-Jun07 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
6.3 |
Jun-07 |
Jul-Sep07 |
5.7 |
6.1 |
6.5 |
Sep-07 |
Oct-Dec07 |
4.8 |
5.3 |
6.0 |
Dec-07 |
Jan-Mar08 |
4.5 |
5.2 |
5.9 |
Mar-08 |
Apr-Jun08 |
4.9 |
5.4 |
6.3 |
Jun-08 |
Jul-Sep08 |
6.9 |
7.5 |
7.9 |
Sep-08 |
Oct-Dec08 |
12.0 |
12.8 |
13.5 |
Oct-08 |
Oct-Dec08 |
11.3 |
11.6 |
12.4 |
Dec-08 |
Jan-Mar09 |
9.3 |
8.9 |
9.6 |
Mar-09 |
Apr-Jun09 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
6.2 |
Jun-09 |
July-Sep09 |
5.8 |
6.3 |
6.7 |
Sep-09 |
Oct-Dec09 |
8.2 |
8.7 |
9.2 |
Dec-09 |
Jan-Mar10 |
11.1 |
11.6 |
11.9 |
Mar-10 |
Apr-Jun10 |
10.3 |
10.6 |
11.0 |
Jun-10 |
July-Sep10 |
11.1 |
11.4 |
11.9 |
Sep-10 |
Oct-Dec10 |
12.1 |
12.3 |
12.7 |
Dec-10 |
Jan-Mar11 |
11.8 |
12.4 |
13.1 |
Mar-11 |
Apr-Jun11 |
11.5 |
11.9 |
12.7 |
 |
 |
Table 6: Volatility in Responses in Various Rounds |
Round No. |
Survey Quarter |
Inflation Rate |
Current |
Three-month Ahead |
One-year Ahead |
Mean % |
Std. Dev. |
Mean % |
Std. Dev. |
Mean % |
Std. Dev. |
14 |
Dec-08 |
9.3 |
1.9 |
8.9 |
3.5 |
9.6 |
3.9 |
15 |
Mar-09 |
5.2 |
1.9 |
5.3 |
2.6 |
6.2 |
2.7 |
16 |
Jun-09 |
5.8 |
4.4 |
6.3 |
4.6 |
6.7 |
4.7 |
17 |
Sep-09 |
8.2 |
6.0 |
8.7 |
6.0 |
9.2 |
5.9 |
18 |
Dec-09 |
11.1 |
4.9 |
11.6 |
4.9 |
11.9 |
5.1 |
19 |
Mar-10 |
10.3 |
4.4 |
10.6 |
4.7 |
11.0 |
4.8 |
20 |
Jun-10 |
11.1 |
3.6 |
11.4 |
4.1 |
11.9 |
4.2 |
21 |
Sep-10 |
12.1 |
3.2 |
12.3 |
3.6 |
12.7 |
3.8 |
22 |
Dec-10 |
11.8 |
3.5 |
12.4 |
3.7 |
13.1 |
3.6 |
23 |
Mar-11 |
11.5 |
3.1 |
11.9 |
3.7 |
12.7 |
3.6 |
Table 7: Factors that Explain the Total Variability |
Round No. |
Survey Quarter |
Current |
Three-month Ahead |
One-year Ahead |
14 |
Dec-08 |
City, Gender, Age |
City, Gender, Category |
City, Category |
15 |
Mar-09 |
City, Category |
City, Gender, Category |
City, Category |
16 |
Jun-09 |
City, Gender, Category, Age |
City, Gender, Category |
City, Category, Age |
17 |
Sep-09 |
City, Age |
City, Age |
City, Age |
18 |
Dec-09 |
City, Category, Age |
City, Age |
City |
19 |
Mar-10 |
City, Category, Age |
City, Category |
City, Category |
20 |
Jun-10 |
City, Category, Age |
City, Category, Age |
City, Category, Age |
21 |
Sep-10 |
City, Gender, Category, Age |
City, Gender, Category |
City, Category |
22 |
Dec-10 |
City, Category |
City, Category |
City, Category |
23 |
Mar-11 |
City, Category |
City, Category |
City, Category, Age |
Note: Results based on exercise using Analysis of Variance. |
Chart 2 depicts the household inflation
expectations along with the official inflation
measures based on Wholesale Price Index (WPI) – All
commodities and Consumer Price Index for Industrial
Workers (CPI-IW). It shows that for a large part of the
survey history, the households’ inflation expectations
remained between the WPI and CPI-IW inflations.
On the contrary, in the current survey round,
household inflation expectations are higher than
the official inflation rates. It is observed that
expectations that have declined marginally are moving
in line with more or less stable official indicators.
III. 5 Volatility in Responses
The volatility in responses is measured through
standard deviation. Over different rounds, the standard
deviation has been lower for current inflation rate as
compared to three-month ahead and one-year ahead
(Table 6).
Table 8: Gender-wise Inflation Expectations for March 2011 Survey Round |
Gender-wise |
Current |
Three-month Ahead |
One-year Ahead |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Male |
11.4 |
3.1 |
11.7 |
3.8 |
12.6 |
3.6 |
Female |
11.7 |
3.0 |
12.1 |
3.5 |
12.7 |
3.6 |
The total variability in responses for inflation
expectations was elucidated by different classificatory
factors (viz., Gender, Age-group, City and Category) of
respondents over different rounds. An Analysis of
Variance (ANOVA) carried out over different rounds
revealed that ‘City’ has been a significant source of
variation in all rounds (Table 7). This may be due to
variation in consumption baskets across the cities.
III.6 Gender-wise Expectations
In the current round of survey, female
respondents expected higher inflation rates as
compared to their male counterparts (Table 8).
However, there is no significant difference between
male and female respondents in terms of the
consistency in responses over various survey rounds
and for current, three-month ahead and one-year ahead
periods.
III.7 Category-wise Expectations
The category of respondents indicates their
occupation status. For the latest survey round, daily
workers and housewives reported higher inflation
expectations whereas financial sector employees
expected the lowest inflation (Table 9).
Table 9: Category-wise Inflation Expectations for March 2011 Survey Round |
Occupation-wise |
Current |
Three-month Ahead |
One-year Ahead |
|
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Financial Sector Employees |
11.1 |
3.3 |
11.2 |
4.0 |
11.9 |
4.1 |
Other Employees |
11.3 |
3.1 |
11.6 |
3.7 |
12.5 |
3.6 |
Self Employed |
11.4 |
3.1 |
11.8 |
3.7 |
12.7 |
3.5 |
Housewives |
11.7 |
3.0 |
12.1 |
3.5 |
12.8 |
3.6 |
Retired Persons |
11.5 |
3.0 |
11.9 |
3.6 |
12.7 |
3.4 |
Daily Workers |
12.0 |
3.0 |
12.3 |
3.7 |
13.1 |
3.4 |
Other categories |
11.4 |
3.0 |
11.8 |
3.6 |
12.7 |
3.4 |
III.8 Age Group-wise Expectations
The survey covers only adult respondents of 18
years or more. During the current survey round, the
respondents in the age group ‘Upto 25 years’ and ’35
to 40 years’ have reported the highest inflation rates
for current and three-month ahead periods (Table 10).
The one-year ahead inflation expectations were higher
for the age-groups ‘35 to 40 years’ and ‘60 years and
above’. However, over the survey rounds, no agespecific
consistency is observed in inflation
expectations.
III.9 City-wise Expectations
Significant variations were observed in the
inflation expectations across different cities, which
may be attributed to the divergence in consumption
pattern between cities. In the latest round of the
survey, current inflation was found to be the highest
in Bangalore and the lowest in Patna, three-month
ahead inflation expectations were found to be the highest in Jaipur and the lowest in Patna whereas oneyear
ahead inflation expectations were found to be the
highest in Jaipur and Bangalore and the lowest in
Guwahati (Table 11). The variability in responses was
the highest in Delhi and the lowest in Patna and Bhopal
for the current inflation.
Table 10: Age Group-wise Inflation Expectations for March 2011 Survey Round |
Age-wise |
Current |
Three-month Ahead |
One-year Ahead |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Upto 25 years |
11.8 |
3.0 |
12.1 |
3.6 |
12.7 |
3.9 |
25 to 30 years |
11.5 |
3.0 |
11.7 |
3.8 |
12.3 |
3.9 |
30 to 35 years |
11.6 |
3.1 |
12.0 |
3.6 |
12.8 |
3.4 |
35 to 40 years |
11.8 |
3.2 |
12.0 |
3.8 |
12.9 |
3.4 |
40 to 45 years |
11.3 |
3.0 |
11.8 |
3.6 |
12.6 |
3.3 |
45 to 50 years |
11.0 |
3.0 |
11.4 |
3.5 |
12.4 |
3.3 |
50 to 55 years |
11.3 |
3.2 |
12.0 |
3.5 |
12.5 |
3.8 |
55 to 60 years |
11.4 |
3.0 |
11.7 |
3.7 |
12.8 |
3.4 |
60 years and above |
11.5 |
3.1 |
11.9 |
3.6 |
12.9 |
3.4 |
All |
11.5 |
3.1 |
11.9 |
3.7 |
12.7 |
3.6 |
III.10 Cross-tabulation of Current Inflation and
Future Expectations
The distribution of inflation expectations
expresses the degree of respondents’ optimism on
future price movement vis-à-vis current price changes.
The cross-tabulation depicting the relationship
between the current and future inflation expectations
for three-month and one-year ahead are presented in
Table 12 & Table 13 and the same is depicted in Chart
3. It may be observed that 66.3 per cent respondents
perceived double-digit current inflation. Similarly, 76.4 per cent and 82.7 per cent of the respondents expected
the three-month ahead inflation and one-year ahead
inflation in double-digit figures. A cross-tabulation of
the current inflation perception with the future inflation expectations points out that among the 66.3
per cent respondents who perceived the current
inflation in double-digit, 93.7 and 92.3 per cent
respondents expected that it would remain in the same band for three-month ahead and one-year ahead,
respectively.
Table 11: City-wise Inflation Expectations for March 2011 Survey Round |
City-wise |
Current |
Three-month Ahead |
One-year Ahead |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Mean |
Std. Dev. |
Guwahati |
9.1 |
0.8 |
9.7 |
1.0 |
9.8 |
1.1 |
Patna |
7.7 |
0.7 |
9.0 |
1.4 |
12.2 |
1.5 |
Kolkata |
9.7 |
1.4 |
9.7 |
2.9 |
10.1 |
3.1 |
Lucknow |
11.7 |
2.0 |
11.9 |
2.1 |
13.0 |
2.3 |
Delhi |
11.2 |
3.6 |
11.7 |
4.2 |
13.7 |
3.5 |
Jaipur |
15.6 |
1.5 |
16.0 |
1.1 |
16.1 |
1.0 |
Ahmedabad |
9.8 |
1.0 |
11.5 |
1.0 |
13.0 |
1.0 |
Mumbai |
13.7 |
3.2 |
13.6 |
4.3 |
14.6 |
3.4 |
Bhopal |
10.5 |
0.7 |
10.4 |
3.7 |
10.8 |
4.5 |
Hyderabad |
10.9 |
1.0 |
9.8 |
4.4 |
9.8 |
4.5 |
Bangalore |
15.9 |
1.9 |
15.9 |
1.9 |
16.1 |
1.6 |
Chennai |
11.8 |
2.2 |
12.6 |
2.3 |
12.4 |
2.9 |
All |
11.5 |
3.1 |
11.9 |
3.7 |
12.7 |
3.6 |
Table 12 : Cross-tabulation of Current and Three-month Ahead Inflation Expectations |
Three-month ahead inflation rate (per cent) |
|
|
< 1 |
1-2 |
2-3 |
3-4 |
4-5 |
5-6 |
6-7 |
7-8 |
8-9 |
9-10 |
10-11 |
11-12 |
12-13 |
13-14 |
14-15 |
15-16 |
>=16 |
No Idea |
Total |
Current inflation rate (per cent) |
<1 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
1-2 |
|
5 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
2-3 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
3-4 |
|
|
1 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
4-5 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
12 |
5-6 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
6-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
12 |
11 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
7-8 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
65 |
114 |
20 |
37 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
249 |
8-9 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
22 |
130 |
135 |
77 |
27 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
|
2 |
2 |
430 |
9-10 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
14 |
129 |
242 |
121 |
26 |
6 |
2 |
|
6 |
4 |
561 |
10-11 |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
16 |
160 |
384 |
150 |
17 |
10 |
4 |
7 |
14 |
818 |
11-12 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
103 |
205 |
53 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
427 |
12-13 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
72 |
131 |
19 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
239 |
13-14 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
4 |
102 |
84 |
12 |
5 |
|
211 |
14-15 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
68 |
70 |
10 |
2 |
159 |
15-16 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
37 |
67 |
1 |
107 |
>=16 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
662 |
1 |
691 |
Total |
162 |
5 |
8 |
9 |
9 |
14 |
28 |
105 |
272 |
302 |
528 |
648 |
467 |
319 |
195 |
136 |
762 |
31 |
4,000 |
Table 13 : Cross-tabulation of Current and One-year Ahead Inflation Expectations |
One-year ahead inflation rate (per cent) |
| |
|
< 1 |
1-2 |
2-3 |
3-4 |
4-5 |
5-6 |
6-7 |
7-8 |
8-9 |
9-10 |
10-11 |
11-12 |
12-13 |
13-14 |
14-15 |
15-16 |
>=16 |
No Idea |
Total |
Current inflation rate (per cent) |
<1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
1-2 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
2-3 |
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
10 |
3-4 |
|
|
1 |
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
10 |
4-5 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
12 |
5-6 |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
6-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
3 |
9 |
1 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
41 |
7-8 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
26 |
11 |
24 |
24 |
57 |
48 |
34 |
11 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
249 |
8-9 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
3 |
7 |
105 |
32 |
106 |
68 |
38 |
25 |
10 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
430 |
9-10 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
17 |
133 |
61 |
119 |
86 |
55 |
27 |
7 |
35 |
9 |
561 |
10-11 |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
6 |
29 |
152 |
131 |
188 |
116 |
64 |
24 |
29 |
25 |
818 |
11-12 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
12 |
92 |
83 |
100 |
41 |
29 |
20 |
6 |
427 |
12-13 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
15 |
67 |
23 |
72 |
29 |
19 |
2 |
239 |
13-14 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
55 |
31 |
79 |
20 |
2 |
211 |
14-15 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
12 |
51 |
20 |
66 |
4 |
159 |
15-16 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
29 |
71 |
1 |
107 |
>=16 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
673 |
5 |
691 |
Total |
148 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
7 |
10 |
24 |
45 |
151 |
233 |
370 |
488 |
536 |
424 |
315 |
233 |
941 |
66 |
4,000 |
III.11 Awareness on Reserve Bank of India’s
Action to Control Inflation
An additional block (Block 4) was added to the
survey schedule from the 21st round (September 2010)
to determine the awareness of public on Reserve Bank’s
action on inflation control. Out of the two questions
in this block, the first one elicits the respondent’s
awareness whether the Reserve Bank is taking
necessary action on controlling inflation whereas the second one determines whether the respondent thinks
that RBI’s action has got any impact on inflation. The
responses for the latest survey round are presented in
Chart 4. It can be seen that 34 per cent of the
respondents felt that RBI is taking necessary action to
control inflation. Out of these 34 per cent respondents,
61 per cent are aware that RBI’s action has got an impact
on inflation.
The category-wise distribution of the responses
based on ‘Block 4’ points out that the awareness on
RBI’s action on inflation control was the most among ‘Financial Sector Employees’ and it was least in case of
‘Daily Workers’ and ‘Housewives’. However, impact on
RBI’s action on inflation control was the least among
employees other than ‘Financial Sector Employees’
(Chart 5).
The category-wise distribution of the responses
of ‘the impact of RBI’s action on inflation control’
for the 34 per cent respondents who felt that the
Reserve Bank is taking necessary action to control
inflation is also depicted in Table 14.
IV. A Bootstrap Confidence Interval for
Inflation Expectations
In the previous sections, the average rates of
inflation expectations are presented. Using the Bootstrap re-sampling method, interval estimates of
the average inflation expectations of households are
presented, so as to give an idea of the error associated
with the estimates of households’ inflation
expectations.
Table 14: Category-wise Responses on the Impact of the Reserve Bank’s Action on Inflation Control |
Category |
Impact of RBI’s action on inflation control
(per cent of respondents*) |
|
Yes |
No |
No Idea |
Financial Sector Employees |
65.8 |
23.9 |
10.4 |
Other Employees |
56.3 |
27.7 |
16.0 |
Self-employed |
56.7 |
24.7 |
18.6 |
Housewives |
63.5 |
21.7 |
14.8 |
Retired Persons |
61.1 |
28.6 |
10.3 |
Daily Workers |
66.2 |
15.4 |
18.5 |
Other Categories |
66.7 |
14.6 |
18.8 |
* Respondents who are aware of the RBI’s action on inflation control |
The Bootstrap is a re-sampling method for statistical
inference, wherein the sampling distribution of a
statistic can be obtained without specific knowledge of
the exact distribution of the population variable under
study. It is commonly used to estimate confidence
intervals through Bootstrapping, a confidence interval
of not only population mean but also the population
median and other parameters can be obtained.
Drawing 10,000 re-samples using simple random
sampling with replacement from the sample of the
survey, 99 per cent Bootstrap Confidence Intervals (BCI)
for mean were obtained. The results are presented in
Table 15. It is observed that the exercise leads to a
confidence interval with a small width indicating that
the point estimates are quite precise for estimating the
population means of households’ expectations of
inflation.
Table 15: 99% Bootstrap Confidence Intervals (BCI)
Based on 10,000 Re-samples |
Current |
Three-month Ahead |
One-year Ahead |
99% BCI for
Mean % |
Interval
width |
99% BCI for
Mean % |
Interval
width |
99% BCI for
Mean % |
Interval
width |
(11.39,11.64) |
0.25 |
(11.71,12.00) |
0.29 |
(12.51,12.81) |
0.30 |
Statement 1: Percentage of Respondents – Product-wise Expectations of Prices for Three-month and one-year Ahead |
1. General |
Round No./survey period ’ |
Three-month Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
Options |
Dec-08 |
Mar-09 |
Jun-09 |
Sep-09 |
Dec-09 |
Mar-10 |
Jun-10 |
Sep-10 |
Dec-10 |
Mar-11 |
Prices will increase |
89.8 |
92.0 |
93.1 |
95.8 |
97.4 |
95.7 |
95.3 |
96.5 |
98.6 |
96.0 |
Price increase more than current rate |
52.9 |
54.9 |
63.5 |
72.2 |
74.6 |
66.9 |
72.7 |
72.2 |
74.3 |
72.9 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
20.1 |
22.4 |
20.7 |
18.4 |
16.6 |
20.0 |
20.0 |
21.0 |
22.0 |
20.4 |
Price increase less than current rate |
16.8 |
14.8 |
8.9 |
5.1 |
6.2 |
8.8 |
2.6 |
3.3 |
2.3 |
2.7 |
No change in prices |
5.7 |
6.9 |
6.1 |
3.7 |
2.4 |
3.4 |
4.2 |
2.9 |
1.1 |
3.5 |
Decline in price |
4.5 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
Options |
One-year Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
Prices will increase |
90.6 |
95.6 |
93.7 |
96.3 |
96.3 |
96.5 |
95.2 |
95.6 |
98.9 |
96.1 |
Price increase more than current rate |
59.7 |
64.7 |
62.8 |
69.5 |
68.2 |
62.8 |
70.8 |
70.4 |
77.4 |
73.4 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
18.0 |
15.9 |
18.5 |
17.3 |
15.2 |
19.8 |
18.7 |
19.7 |
17.9 |
18.6 |
Price increase less than current rate |
12.9 |
15.0 |
12.4 |
9.5 |
12.9 |
13.9 |
5.7 |
5.6 |
3.6 |
4.2 |
No change in prices |
3.1 |
3.3 |
5.3 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
2.6 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
0.9 |
3.5 |
Decline in price |
6.3 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
2. Food Prices |
Round No./survey period ’ |
Three-month Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
Options |
Dec-08 |
Mar-09 |
Jun-09 |
Sep-09 |
Dec-09 |
Mar-10 |
Jun-10 |
Sep-10 |
Dec-10 |
Mar-11 |
Prices will increase |
90.9 |
93.6 |
94.6 |
96.3 |
98.0 |
95.9 |
95.8 |
96.7 |
98.1 |
95.4 |
Price increase more than current rate |
53.5 |
58.6 |
64.5 |
76.1 |
81.1 |
70.4 |
74.9 |
74.7 |
73.1 |
69.4 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
19.7 |
23.3 |
21.5 |
15.0 |
11.7 |
15.5 |
17.7 |
18.0 |
21.3 |
21.0 |
Price increase less than current rate |
17.8 |
11.8 |
8.6 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
10.0 |
3.2 |
4.0 |
3.7 |
5.1 |
No change in prices |
5.3 |
5.6 |
4.6 |
3.0 |
1.4 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
2.3 |
1.4 |
3.8 |
Decline in price |
3.8 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
Options |
One-year Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
Prices will increase |
91.4 |
96.6 |
94.7 |
96.2 |
96.5 |
96.8 |
95.6 |
95.7 |
98.6 |
95.9 |
Price increase more than current rate |
60.3 |
66.2 |
63.6 |
71.0 |
72.1 |
65.9 |
72.8 |
71.7 |
76.4 |
75.5 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
17.4 |
18.1 |
18.9 |
15.2 |
11.9 |
16.5 |
16.9 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
16.6 |
Price increase less than current rate |
13.7 |
12.4 |
12.2 |
10.0 |
12.5 |
14.5 |
5.9 |
6.2 |
4.4 |
3.9 |
No change in prices |
2.9 |
2.7 |
4.5 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
2.3 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
1.1 |
3.6 |
Decline in price |
5.8 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
| 3. Non-Food Prices |
Round No./survey period ’ |
Three-month Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
|
Options |
Dec-08 |
Mar-09 |
Jun-09 |
Sep-09 |
Dec-09 |
Mar-10 |
Jun-10 |
Sep-10 |
Dec-10 |
Mar-11 |
Prices will increase |
88.6 |
91.0 |
91.4 |
94.7 |
95.8 |
94.0 |
92.9 |
95.4 |
95.9 |
95.0 |
Price increase more than current rate |
47.5 |
48.6 |
51.2 |
59.3 |
63.1 |
57.4 |
60.1 |
64.4 |
58.8 |
58.4 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
23.3 |
25.5 |
28.4 |
27.1 |
24.8 |
28.0 |
29.4 |
27.3 |
33.2 |
31.3 |
Price increase less than current rate |
17.8 |
17.0 |
11.8 |
8.3 |
7.9 |
8.7 |
3.4 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
5.3 |
No change in prices |
6.6 |
7.8 |
7.7 |
4.7 |
3.7 |
4.8 |
6.3 |
3.9 |
0.5 |
4.4 |
Decline in price |
4.9 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
Options |
One-year Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
Prices will increase |
89.3 |
94.6 |
91.9 |
95.2 |
94.6 |
94.7 |
92.8 |
94.6 |
97.5 |
94.7 |
Price increase more than current rate |
54.0 |
57.5 |
53.1 |
59.6 |
60.7 |
53.0 |
59.7 |
64.0 |
65.2 |
59.9 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
21.8 |
20.4 |
25.0 |
23.6 |
20.7 |
27.6 |
26.4 |
24.9 |
28.1 |
29.2 |
Price increase less than current rate |
13.5 |
16.7 |
13.8 |
12.1 |
13.2 |
14.1 |
6.7 |
5.7 |
4.2 |
5.6 |
No change in prices |
4.1 |
4.1 |
7.3 |
4.0 |
4.6 |
4.2 |
5.9 |
4.4 |
2.2 |
4.6 |
Decline in price |
6.6 |
1.4 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
Statement I: Percentage of Respondents – Product-wise Expectations of Prices for Three-month and One-year Ahead (contd.) |
4. Prices of Household durables |
Round No./survey period |
Three-month Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
Options |
Dec-08 |
Mar-09 |
Jun-09 |
Sep-09 |
Dec-09 |
Mar-10 |
Jun-10 |
Sep-10 |
Dec-10 |
Mar-11 |
Prices will increase |
78.2 |
82.5 |
80.0 |
86.8 |
87.7 |
86.4 |
87.1 |
89.7 |
91.9 |
90.4 |
Price increase more than current rate |
32.6 |
33.2 |
37.2 |
38.4 |
45.5 |
44.1 |
45.1 |
45.8 |
45.5 |
47.0 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
24.6 |
24.2 |
26.3 |
30.5 |
23.4 |
27.2 |
30.5 |
32.9 |
28.9 |
28.0 |
Price increase less than current rate |
21.0 |
25.2 |
16.5 |
18.0 |
18.9 |
15.1 |
11.6 |
11.0 |
17.5 |
15.4 |
No change in prices |
12.9 |
14.6 |
15.7 |
11.0 |
9.5 |
8.8 |
9.1 |
6.3 |
5.9 |
5.9 |
Decline in price |
9.0 |
2.9 |
4.4 |
2.2 |
2.9 |
4.8 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
2.4 |
3.8 |
Options |
One-year Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
Prices will increase |
79.1 |
84.6 |
80.4 |
88.7 |
87.8 |
85.2 |
87.2 |
89.0 |
94.4 |
91.3 |
Price increase more than current rate |
38.6 |
40.1 |
38.4 |
43.3 |
45.5 |
43.2 |
46.6 |
46.3 |
48.6 |
49.6 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
21.5 |
22.4 |
24.3 |
28.2 |
22.1 |
25.4 |
30.1 |
31.8 |
32.5 |
29.0 |
Price increase less than current rate |
19.0 |
22.1 |
17.7 |
17.3 |
20.3 |
16.6 |
10.6 |
11.0 |
13.3 |
12.8 |
No change in prices |
12.1 |
11.2 |
16.2 |
9.1 |
8.5 |
9.6 |
8.0 |
6.7 |
3.8 |
5.7 |
Decline in price |
8.8 |
4.2 |
3.5 |
2.2 |
3.7 |
5.3 |
4.8 |
4.3 |
1.9 |
3.0 |
5. Housing Prices |
Round No./survey period |
Three-month Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
Options |
Dec-08 |
Mar-09 |
Jun-09 |
Sep-09 |
Dec-09 |
Mar-10 |
Jun-10 |
Sep-10 |
Dec-10 |
Mar-11 |
Prices will increase |
88.4 |
89.8 |
92.4 |
93.8 |
96.1 |
95.2 |
96.1 |
96.0 |
97.0 |
94.5 |
Price increase more than current rate |
49.7 |
46.2 |
55.9 |
64.4 |
70.8 |
60.4 |
70.8 |
64.6 |
73.1 |
73.5 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
20.8 |
26.4 |
25.4 |
22.0 |
19.8 |
25.4 |
21.0 |
24.8 |
21.3 |
18.3 |
Price increase less than current rate |
17.9 |
17.2 |
11.1 |
7.4 |
5.6 |
9.5 |
4.3 |
6.7 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
No change in prices |
6.8 |
8.3 |
6.4 |
5.0 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
2.8 |
2.1 |
4.7 |
Decline in price |
4.8 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
0.5 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
Options |
One-year Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
Prices will increase |
87.0 |
93.0 |
93.0 |
94.9 |
96.4 |
94.1 |
96.1 |
95.3 |
97.9 |
94.8 |
Price increase more than current rate |
56.3 |
57.4 |
57.6 |
66.0 |
73.4 |
61.0 |
72.0 |
65.9 |
75.5 |
72.1 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
20.2 |
20.0 |
22.1 |
21.4 |
15.1 |
21.7 |
19.1 |
21.6 |
19.4 |
20.1 |
Price increase less than current rate |
10.5 |
15.6 |
13.3 |
7.6 |
7.9 |
11.4 |
5.0 |
7.9 |
3.0 |
2.7 |
No change in prices |
5.5 |
5.4 |
5.8 |
3.8 |
2.9 |
4.6 |
2.7 |
3.2 |
1.4 |
4.6 |
Decline in price |
7.6 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
6. Cost of Services |
Round No./survey period |
Three-month Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23.0 |
Options |
Dec-08 |
Mar-09 |
Jun-09 |
Sep-09 |
Dec-09 |
Mar-10 |
Jun-10 |
Sep-10 |
Dec-10 |
Mar-11 |
Prices will increase |
86.1 |
87.8 |
87.3 |
92.4 |
91.7 |
89.9 |
94.1 |
94.2 |
94.1 |
91.6 |
Price increase more than current rate |
43.9 |
42.2 |
53.1 |
63.7 |
62.7 |
58.6 |
63.2 |
59.2 |
61.4 |
62.1 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
26.9 |
29.2 |
22.2 |
22.9 |
21.2 |
23.9 |
26.2 |
28.6 |
28.9 |
26.4 |
Price increase less than current rate |
15.3 |
16.4 |
12.0 |
5.8 |
7.8 |
7.5 |
4.8 |
6.4 |
3.8 |
3.1 |
No change in prices |
10.3 |
10.4 |
11.3 |
6.3 |
7.0 |
6.7 |
4.8 |
5.2 |
4.5 |
7.7 |
Decline in price |
3.7 |
1.8 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
3.4 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
1.4 |
0.7 |
Options |
One-year Ahead (percentage of respondents) |
Prices will increase |
88.4 |
90.7 |
88.1 |
95.0 |
92.3 |
89.9 |
94.2 |
94.3 |
95.2 |
91.2 |
Price increase more than current rate |
52.1 |
49.2 |
54.4 |
65.6 |
62.9 |
57.2 |
63.2 |
58.0 |
64.6 |
62.6 |
Price increase similar to current rate |
23.5 |
23.9 |
20.2 |
21.5 |
18.5 |
23.0 |
24.9 |
29.5 |
25.7 |
24.4 |
Price increase less than current rate |
12.9 |
17.6 |
13.5 |
7.9 |
10.9 |
9.8 |
6.1 |
6.8 |
4.9 |
4.2 |
No change in prices |
6.7 |
7.3 |
10.3 |
4.1 |
6.0 |
6.9 |
4.6 |
4.9 |
4.1 |
8.2 |
Decline in price |
4.9 |
2.1 |
1.6 |
1.0 |
1.8 |
3.2 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
|