Indian equity and foreign exchange markets, unlike the debt and money markets, showed greater
volatility in Q2 of 2011-12 than in the previous quarter. This mainly reflected risk aversion
arising out of the deepening euro area sovereign debt crisis. Going forward, domestic growth
and inflation outlook, resilience of the banking sector and the nature and depth of global
uncertainty will shape the developments in the financial markets. The global markets will
primarily track the international policy actions to address the problem of euro area sovereign
debt crisis and slowdown in advanced economies (AEs).
Risk aversion, volatility back in global
markets driven by sovereign debt crisis
V.1 The downgrade of US sovereign debt
rating by S&P and deteriorating sovereign debt
problems in the euro area resulted in renewed
volatility in global financial markets during Q2
of 2011-12. The credit default swaps (CDS)
spreads of stressed euro area economies like
Portugal, Italy and Greece widened since
August 2011, reflecting market perception of
worsening sovereign debt sustainability of these
economies. AAA rated sovereigns, such as
Germany and France, were also impacted in the
absence of credible measures to contain the
pervasive impact of the worsening sovereign
crisis (Chart V.1). Several periphery and core
European countries including Italy and Spain
were downgraded by the credit rating agencies
following the debt concerns, slackening economic activity and weakening financial
systems.
Debt overhang causing significant
spillover risks
V.2 There is a growing threat that financial
stability concerns would get transmitted to the
real economy as sovereign debt problems
translate into a deterioration of the balance
sheets of banks holding these sovereign bonds,
mainly in Europe. The stocks of European
banks, particularly those with high exposure to
the sovereign debt issued by the periphery
countries, faced broad-based sell-offs. The CDS
spreads of banks widened to levels higher than
those during the US sub-prime crisis, partly
reflecting the risk perception arising from lack
of progress in deleveraging in euro area banks
(Chart V.2).
Debt resolution deadlock adds to market
uncertainties
V.3 One of the main policy tools to deal with
the 2008 crisis was fiscal stimulus. AEs raised
public expenditure and pared down some tax
burden expecting thereby to boost private
demand. Nonetheless, reflecting deleveraging
by households, tight bank lending and deflation
in house prices, private demand decelerated,
muting the fiscal multiplier. Presently, while
unemployment continues to remain at elevated
levels, the option of fiscal stimulus is largely
unavailable on account of concerns over debt
sustainability. The governments of AEs are
striving to find a balance between the need for
a fiscal stimulus in the short-term against
sustainable fiscal adjustment in the mediumterm.
V.4 Reacting to the growing uncertainties in
the policy outlook, global financial markets
declined despite an assurance in the euro area
summit (July 2011) to increase the flexibility
of the European Financial Stability Facility
(EFSF). That assurance failed to inspire
confidence underlining the challenge of keeping
a monetary union intact even without a fiscal
union. The policy announcement by the US Fed
to keep the longer-term interest rates low
through its maturity extension programme
(“operation twist”) on September 21, 2011 has
received limited response so far.
Search for safe heaven assets continues
V.5 There has been a shift in investor
preference towards perceived safe haven assets
(Chart V.3). This has triggered global selloffs in the equity markets and portfolio rebalancing
in favour of gold as a safe asset has caused
gold prices to touch a historical high of
US $1900 per troy ounce on September
5, 2011. The slowdown in growth of AEs led
to the decline in the crude oil prices in the
quarter.
V.6 International currency markets turned
volatile during Q2 of 2011-12. The US dollar
appreciated vis-a-vis the euro (Chart V.4).
Spillover pressures witnessed in Indian
equity and currency markets
V.7 Taking cues from the global turmoil, Indian
financial market segments that have a high
degree of cross-border linkages turned volatile,
while the other segments without strong linkages
remained orderly. As a result, increased volatility
was evidenced in the equity and currency
markets since September 2011 (Chart V.5a).
V.8 In line with the global markets, the Indian
equity prices continued their declining trend in
Q2 of 2011-12. The rise in equity indices at the
beginning of Q2 due to FII inflows could not
sustain the momentum owing to global
developments and net sales by FIIs ensued. The
two key Indian equity indices, Sensex and Nifty,
declined (y-o-y) by about 14.5 per cent and 14.7
per cent, respectively, as on October 19, 2011.
Nonetheless, the decline in Indian equity
markets was relatively less than that in many
emerging and developing economies (EDEs).
P-E ratio of Indian equities remained higher
than other EDEs as at end September 2011
(Table V.1, V.2 and Chart V.5b).
Table V.1: Stock Price Movement and P/E Ratios in EDEs and AEs |
Items |
Stock Price Variations (Per cent) |
P/E- Ratios |
End-Mar 2010@ |
End-Mar 2011@ |
End-Sep 2011* |
End-Mar 2010 |
End-Mar 2011 |
End-Sep 2011 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Brazil (Bovespa) |
72.0 |
-2.5 |
-23.7 |
16.4 |
10.9 |
8.0 |
China (Shanghai Composite) |
31.0 |
-5.8 |
-19.4 |
23.1 |
16.3 |
12.6 |
India (BSE Sensex) |
80.5 |
10.9 |
-15.4 |
17.7 |
17.6 |
17.9 |
Indonesia (Jakarta Composite) |
93.7 |
32.5 |
-3.5 |
13.6 |
16.9 |
16.1 |
Malaysia (KLCI) |
51.4 |
17.0 |
-10.2 |
18.9 |
17.0 |
14.8 |
Russia (RTS) |
128.0 |
30.0 |
-34.4 |
9.8 |
8.4 |
5.1 |
Singapore (Straits Times) |
69.9 |
7.6 |
-13.9 |
13.4 |
10.3 |
7.4 |
South Korea (KOSPI) |
40.3 |
24.4 |
-16.0 |
12.2 |
13.8 |
12.3 |
Taiwan (Taiwan Index) |
52.0 |
9.6 |
-16.8 |
19.1 |
15.7 |
13.8 |
Thailand (SET Composite) |
82.6 |
32.9 |
-12.5 |
12.4 |
13.3 |
11.1 |
France (CAC 40) |
41.6 |
0.4 |
-25.3 |
15.2 |
11.9 |
8.6 |
FTSE 100 |
44.7 |
4.0 |
-13.2 |
15.6 |
14.4 |
10.0 |
FTSE EUROTOP 100 |
44.8 |
13.3 |
-17.3 |
14.2 |
12.6 |
9.7 |
Germany (DAX) |
50.6 |
14.4 |
-21.9 |
17.5 |
12.8 |
9.8 |
Hong Kong (Hang Seng) |
56.5 |
10.8 |
-25.2 |
15.2 |
12.0 |
8.1 |
Japan (Nikkei) |
36.8 |
-12.0 |
-10.8 |
39.1 |
17.9 |
16.3 |
United States of America (S&P 500) |
46.6 |
13.4 |
-14.7 |
17.1 |
15.1 |
12.4 |
@: Year-on-year variation. *: Variation over end-March 2011.
Source: Bloomberg. |
 |
FII investments decline
V.9 FII investments declined during Q2 of
2011-12. FIIs made net sales in the equity
segment while making net purchases in the debt
segment. Mutual funds (MFs) made net
purchases in both equity and debt segments.
The turnover in equity derivatives segment
increased substantially over the year. FII
investments in equity derivatives increased
significantly during Q2 as compared to the
previous quarter (Chart V.6).
V.10 Resource mobilisation in the primary
segment of the domestic capital market was
lower during 2011-12 (up to September) (Table
V.3). Dampened secondary market conditions
and poor performance of the IPOs after their
listing also affected investor and promoter
sentiment. Resource mobilisation by MFs,
however, improved.
Table V.2: Key Stock Market Indicators |
Indicator |
BSE Sensex |
NSE Nifty |
2010-11 |
Apr-Sep 2010-11 |
Apr-Sep 2011-12 |
2010-11 |
Apr-Sep 2010-11 |
Apr-Sep 2011-12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1. |
BSE Sensex/S&P CNX Nifty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) End-period |
19445.22 |
20069.12 |
16453.76 |
5833.75 |
6029.95 |
4943.25 |
|
(ii) Average |
18605.18 |
17866.06 |
18003.77 |
5583.54 |
5360.57 |
5406.38 |
2. |
Coefficient of Variation(%) |
6.32 |
4.88 |
5.64 |
6.40 |
4.92 |
5.62 |
3. |
Price-Earning Ratio @ |
21.25 |
22.99 |
18.35 |
22.14 |
25.46 |
17.85 |
4. |
Price-Book Value Ratio |
3.70 |
3.70 |
3.40 |
3.70 |
3.80 |
2.90 |
5. |
Market Capitalisation to GDP Ratio (per cent)@ |
86.80 |
90.45 |
66.28 |
85.10 |
88.36 |
64.81 |
@: As at end-period.
Source: Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE) and National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE). |
Bank CDS spreads widen following the
downgrade of the largest PSB
V.11 Credit rating agency Moody’s
downgraded the largest public sector bank
(PSB) on October 4, 2011 on account of the
asset quality and capital adequacy concerns.
CDS spreads of that bank, which had started
to widen sharply from early August, widened
further by 10 bps that day. The difference in
spreads between the largest private and public
sector banks, which had seen range bound
movements for most part of the previous
quarter, widened in September 2011, partly
reflecting investor concerns about contagion
risk (Chart V.7).
Money market tracks monetary policy
signals
V.12 The monetary policy stance continued to
favour deficit liquidity conditions in Q2 of 2011-12 for effective monetary policy transmission.
Against the backdrop of tight liquidity
conditions in the system, the call rate rose at
the beginning of Q2 and firmed up thereafter,
in line with the 75 bps hike in the policy rate.
The call rate generally hovered around the
policy (repo) rate during Q2.
The money market remained orderly without
exhibiting signs of stress (Chart V.8, Tables V.4 and V.5).
 |
V.13 The collateralised segment (i.e. CBLO
and market repo) accounts for more than 80 per cent of the overnight money market volume
and constitutes the bulk of money market.
Reflecting active market conditions, the
transaction volumes in this segment remained
high. Banks and primary dealers continued to be the most significant borrowers, while the
MFs continued as the major group of lenders
followed by banks in this segment. However,
the share of MFs in the total lending declined
significantly to below 50 per cent in Q2.
Table V.3: Resource Mobilisation from Capital Market |
(` crore) |
Category |
2010-11 (Apr-Mar) |
2010-11 (Apr-Sep) |
2011-12 (Apr-Sep) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
A. Prospectus and Rights Issues* |
37,620 |
14,057 |
11,684P |
1. Private Sector (a+b) |
24,373 |
13,475 |
7,106 |
a) Financial |
3,877 |
3,420 |
901 |
b) Non-financial |
20,496 |
10,054 |
6,205 |
2. Public Sector |
13,247 |
583 |
4,578 |
B. Euro Issues |
9,441 |
7,443 |
1,783 |
C. Mutual Fund Mobilisation (net)@ |
-49,406 |
-452 |
55,280 |
1. Private Sector |
-19,215 |
18,744 |
52,451 |
2. Public Sector # |
-30,191 |
-19,196 |
2,829 |
* : Excluding offer for sale.
@ : Net of redemptions.
# : Including UTI Mutual Fund. P: Provisional
Note: Mutual Fund data are sourced from SEBI and exclude
funds mobilised under Fund of Funds Schemes.
Source: SEBI. |
 |
| |
 |
Table V.4: Rates in Domestic Financial Markets at a Glance |
| |
Money Market |
Bond Market |
Forex Market |
Stock Market Indices |
Call Rate* (Per cent) |
Market Repo Rate (Non-RBI) (Per cent) |
CBLO Rate (Per cent) |
Commercial Paper WADR (Per cent) |
Certificates of Deposit WAEIR (Per cent) |
G-Sec 10-year Yield@ (Per cent) |
Corporate Bonds Yield AAA 5-Yr bond (Per cent) |
Exchange Rate@@ (`/US$) |
CNX Nifty# |
BSE Sensex# |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
Mar-10 |
3.51 |
3.32 |
3.15 |
6.29 |
6.07 |
7.94 |
8.61 |
45.50 |
5178 |
17303 |
Mar-11 |
7.15 |
6.56 |
6.46 |
10.40 |
9.96 |
8.00 |
9.23 |
44.99 |
5538 |
18457 |
Apr-11 |
6.58 |
5.55 |
5.63 |
8.62 |
8.66 |
8.02 |
9.25 |
44.37 |
5839 |
19450 |
May-11 |
7.15 |
7.05 |
6.94 |
9.49 |
9.30 |
8.31 |
9.48 |
44.90 |
5492 |
18325 |
Jun-11 |
7.38 |
7.30 |
7.06 |
9.71 |
9.61 |
8.28 |
9.63 |
44.85 |
5473 |
18229 |
Jul-11 |
7.51 |
7.53 |
7.33 |
9.33 |
9.19 |
8.34 |
9.44 |
44.42 |
5597 |
18616 |
Aug-11 |
7.97 |
7.95 |
7.87 |
9.56 |
9.19 |
8.32 |
9.38 |
45.28 |
5077 |
16888 |
Sep-11 |
8.11 |
8.04 |
7.95 |
|
9.14$ |
8.35 |
9.44 |
47.64 |
5016 |
16695 |
*: Weighted average of daily call money borrowing rates. @: Average of daily FIMMDA closing rates.
@@: Average of daily RBI reference rate. #: Average of daily closing indices. $: As on Sep 9, 2011.
WADR: Weighted Average Discount Rate. WAEIR: Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate. |
V.14 In the absence of credit funding pressures
and given reasonable retail deposit mobilisation
in Q2, banks’ issuance of certificates of deposits
(CDs) declined. Consequently the rate of
interest on CDs declined.
V.15 The average fortnightly issuance of
commercial paper (CP) declined in Q2 of 2011-12 (up to August) as compared to that of the
previous quarter. ‘Leasing and finance’ and
‘manufacturing companies’ continued to be the
major issuers of CPs.
V.16 Primary yields on Treasury Bills (TBs)
firmed up consistent with the spurt in overnight
rates during Q2 of 2011-12 (Table V.6). The
upward movement in rates reflected the
marked increase in Government short-term
borrowing through issuance of TBs and cash
management bills (CMBs) to finance
unanticipated cash-flow mismatches coupled
with tight liquidity conditions.
Table V.5: Average Daily Volumes in Domestic Financial Markets |
(` crore) |
| |
Money Market |
Bond Market |
Forex Market |
Stock Market# |
LAF |
Call Money |
Market Repo |
CBLO |
Commercial Paper* |
Certificates of Deposit* |
G-Sec@ |
Corporate Bond |
Inter-bank (US$ mn) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
Mar-10 |
37,640 |
8,812 |
19,150 |
60,006 |
75,506 |
3,41,054 |
6,621 |
1,598 |
16,082 |
9,191 |
Mar-11 |
-80,963 |
11,278 |
15,134 |
43,201 |
80,305 |
4,24,740 |
8,144 |
1,314 |
22,211 |
7,276 |
Apr-11 |
-18,809 |
13,383 |
14,448 |
56,160 |
1,24,991 |
4,47,354 |
6,928 |
1,053 |
25,793 |
8,277 |
May-11 |
-54,643 |
10,973 |
15,897 |
40,925 |
1,21,221 |
4,33,287 |
7,356 |
691 |
24,167 |
6,668 |
Jun-11 |
-74,125 |
11,562 |
16,650 |
41,313 |
1,04,689 |
4,23,767 |
12,844 |
1,168 |
24,047 |
6,404 |
Jul-11 |
-43,759 |
11,513 |
11,748 |
41,006 |
1,33,691 |
4,12,189 |
10,560 |
1,208 |
22,525 |
6,889 |
Aug-11 |
-40,712 |
11,290 |
14,793 |
39,131 |
1,48,812 |
4,05,685 |
15,737 |
1,266 |
23,279 |
6,870 |
Sep-11 |
-55,920 |
13,782 |
13,893 |
45,119 |
|
3,86,470$ |
12,320P |
1,069 |
22,384 |
6,896 |
*: Outstanding position. @: Average daily outright trading volume in Central Government dated securities.
#: Volumes in BSE and NSE (cash segment). $: As on Sep 9, 2011. P: Provisional.
Note: In col. 2, (-) ve sign indicates injection of liquidity while (+) ve sign indicates absorption of liquidity. |
Table V.6: Treasury Bills in the Primary Market |
Year/
Month |
Notified
Amount
(` crore) |
Average Implicit Yield at
Minimum Cut-off Price (Per cent) |
91-day |
182-day |
364-day |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2009-10 |
3,80,000 |
3.57 |
3.97 |
4.38 |
2010-11 |
3,03,000 |
6.18 |
6.48 |
6.56 |
Apr-11 |
30,000 |
7.32 |
7.60 |
7.65 |
May-11 |
44,000 |
8.05 |
8.24 |
8.25 |
Jun-11 |
53,000 |
8.21 |
8.19 |
8.32 |
Jul-11 |
40,000 |
8.21 |
8.23 |
8.34 |
Aug-11 |
40,000 |
8.35 |
8.43 |
8.24 |
Sep-11 |
50,000 |
8.41 |
8.42 |
8.40 |
Oct-11* |
16,000 |
8.46 |
8.62 |
8.52 |
*: Up to October 18, 2011. |
Additional market borrowing puts pressure
on yields
V.17 Yield movements, which remained
generally range bound during July 1-
September 28, 2011 rose thereafter, factoring
in the announced increase in the Government’s
market borrowings by `52,872 crore over and
above the amount budgeted for 2011-12 (Chart
V.9a). The hardening of primary yields was
associated with an increase in the weighted
average maturity during 2011-12 so far
(Table V.7).
V.18 Reflecting the impact of the unanticipated
increase in Government market borrowing, the
spread of 5-year corporate bonds over
comparable G-secs decreased (Chart V.9b).
Table V.7: Issuances of Central and State Government Dated Securities |
Item |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
2011-12* |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Central Government |
|
|
|
Gross amount raised (` crore) |
4,51,000 |
4,37,000 |
2,78,000 |
Devolvement on Primary Dealers (` crore) |
7,219 |
5,773 |
7,168 |
Bid-cover ratio (range) |
1.44-4.32 |
1.39-3.88 |
1.39-3.20 |
Weighted average maturity (years) |
11.16 |
11.62 |
12.20 |
Weighted average yield (per cent) |
7.23 |
7.92 |
8.40 |
State Governments |
|
|
|
Gross amount raised (` crore) |
1,31,122 |
1,04,039 |
76,956 |
Cut-off yield range (per cent) |
7.04-8.58 |
8.05-8.58 |
8.36-9.09 |
Weighted average yield (per cent) |
8.11 |
8.39 |
8.67 |
*: Up to October 18, 2011. |
Monetary transmission strengthens with
rates hardening in the credit market
V.19 During Q2 of 2011-12, banks increased
their deposit rates across all maturities, with the
sharpest rise in maturities up to 1 year for all
categories of banks. The increase in modal
deposit and base rates for the quarter was about
40 bps and 75 bps, respectively (Table V.8).
The rupee depreciated significantly
reflecting global uncertainty
V.20 During April-July 2011, the Indian rupee
exhibited two-way movement. However, since
August 2011, it witnessed depreciation
against all four major international currencies,
reflecting prevailing global market sentiment
led FII-sell-offs (Chart V.10a). Nevertheless, in comparison to some of the EDEs,
the depreciation in the Indian rupee
during Q2 of 2011-12 has been less stark
(Chart V.10b).
Table V.8: Deposit and Lending Rates of Banks |
(Per cent) |
Items |
Sep-10 |
Dec-10 |
Mar-11 |
Jun-2011 |
Sept-11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Domestic Deposit Rates (1-3 years tenor) |
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Public Sector Banks |
6.75-7.75 |
7.00-8.50 |
8.00-9.75 |
8.25-9.75 |
8.55-9.75 |
(ii) Private Sector Banks |
6.50-8.25 |
7.25-9.00 |
7.75-10.10 |
8.00-10.50 |
8.00-10.50 |
(iii) Foreign Banks |
3.00-8.00 |
3.50-8.50 |
3.50-9.10 |
3.50-10.00 |
3.50-9.75 |
Base Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Public Sector Banks |
7.50-8.25 |
7.60-9.00 |
8.25-9.50 |
9.25-10.00 |
10.00-10.75 |
(ii) Private Sector Banks |
7.00-8.75 |
7.00-9.00 |
8.25-10.00 |
8.50-10.50 |
9.75-11.00 |
(iii) Foreign Banks |
5.50-9.00 |
5.50-9.00 |
6.25-9.50 |
6.25-9.50 |
6.25-10.75 |
Median Lending Rate* |
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Public Sector Banks |
7.75-13.50 |
8.75-13.50 |
8.88-14.00 |
9.50-14.50 |
- |
(ii) Private Sector Banks |
8.00-15.00 |
8.25-14.50 |
9.00-14.50 |
9.25-15.00 |
- |
(iii) Foreign Banks |
7.25-13.00 |
8.00-14.50 |
7.70-14.05 |
7.70-14.50 |
- |
* : Median range of interest rates at which at least 60 per cent of business has been contracted.
- : Not available.
Note: Bank group-wise variations in deposit/lending interest rates worked out from the table would differ from those reported in the text as the latter are based on bank-wise and tenor-wise variations in deposit interest rates and bank-wise variations in case of lending rates. |
V.21 The average daily turnover in the
merchant segment as well as interbank segment
of the forex market was lower than that in the
preceding quarter. The volume in value terms in the currency derivative market - both options
and futures - which increased up to August 2011,
showed some deceleration in September 2011
(Chart V.10c).
Housing prices rise amidst falling
transaction volumes in Q1 of 2011-12
V.22 Despite falling volumes, property prices,
as captured by the Reserve Bank’s Quarterly
House Price Index (HPI), firmed up in Q1 of
2011-12. The price index increased by about 8
per cent for the second successive quarter at an
all-India level, while the transactions volume
index that had fallen sharply in Q2 and Q3 of
2010-11 dipped by about 7 per cent in Q1 of
2011-12 negating the increase in the preceding
quarter.
V.23 House prices increased in five of the
seven major cities on a quarter-over-quarter
basis in Q1 of 2011-12, but declined in Kolkata
and remained flat in Chennai (Chart V.11a).
On the other hand, the data on volume of
transactions show that the number of
transactions have fallen in six cities, except
Kolkata (Chart V.11b). On a y-o-y basis, there has been a rise in housing prices and fall in
housing transactions in Q1 of 2011-12 in six
cities, barring Chennai.
More financial volatility likely ahead
V.24 The Indian financial markets will
continue to be conditioned by the evolving
macroeconomic developments, both global and
domestic. Weak outlook for the US economy,
and possible spillover effect from global
contagion of the euro area crisis through the
extremely interconnected European banking
and financial market channel, among others,
pose near-term risks to the financial markets.
Persistence of domestic inflation with a
plausible moderation in growth could impact
corporate earnings, which may affect equity
valuations. On the other hand, with substantial
correction having occurred and limited
investment opportunities globally, markets
could see a recovery. However, the asset quality
of Indian banking sector, the risk exposure and
the challenge of public sector bank
recapitalisation in the face of fiscal pressures
are issues which require attention.
|