The pick-up in inflation in March 2011 was contrary to general expectations of a gradual
softening, as conditioned by decelerating industrial growth as well as sustained anti-inflationary
monetary actions. Inflation in 2011-12 is likely to moderate slowly but remain above comfort
levels reflecting strong persistence. The transmission of rising international commodity
prices and spillover from past food and some wage price inflation in some sectors has been
visible in recent months. Despite moderating food inflation, headline inflation remained firm in
Q4 of 2010-11 as generalised price pressures emerged with rising input costs feeding into
manufactured products inflation. Risks to inflation in 2011-12 have amplified from an uncertain
outlook on international commodity prices, incomplete pass-through to domestic prices and
possibility of prices of food, fuel, minerals and metals staying firm. Policy interventions are
necessary to address near-term and structural imbalances to bring down inflation on an enduring
basis.
Inflation stays elevated, while underlying
drivers change
VI.1 Inflation remained elevated during 2010-
11 driven by both supply shocks as well as
gradual generalisation of price pressures.
Though food inflation moderated during Q4 of
2010-11, increase in prices of a number of
manufactured products and freely priced fuel
items kept headline inflation firm at above the
comfort level. Growing uncertainties in
international commodity markets, continuing
pressure on global commodity prices from
newer shocks like the geo political tensions in
MENA region and supply disruptions in primary
commodity producing countries suggest
increasing risks to the expected moderation in
inflation. These developments necessitated
continuation of the anti-inflationary monetary
policy stance to control inflation and anchor
inflationary expectations.
VI.2 One notable feature of inflation path
during 2010-11 has been the repeated
occurrence of a number of supply shocks
which kept headline inflation stubbornly high.
Subsequently, price pressures have passed
through to other sectors in terms of significant increases in input prices. This was manifested
in the secular increase in the Wholesale Price
Index (WPI), prominently in the second half.
The financial year build-up in inflation,
however, has been lower than what was
experienced during the previous year while
month over month seasonally adjusted changes
remained significantly positive indicating
continued price pressures (Chart VI.1).
Return of global inflation adds to
spillover risks
VI.3 The global inflation environment
exhibited some turnaround in recent months
as increase in commodity prices spilled over
to headline inflation. Most inflation targeting
countries currently have headline inflation
above the target zone. In the case of advanced
economies, core inflation remains subdued
indicating absence of significant pressures
from domestic demand. The rise in inflation,
however, has been more pronounced in the
EMEs. The higher share of food and fuel in
total consumption basket explains a relatively
larger influence of upward movement of
international commodity prices on inflation in
the EMEs.
 |
VI.4 Most advanced economies continue to
pursue accommodative monetary policies as
core inflation remains subdued along with high
unemployment levels and sluggish recovery in
economic growth. However, as commodity
price inflation feeds into inflation expectations
and generalised inflation, advanced economies
could face the policy challenge of containing
inflation, even when recovery remains fragile.
Even though the policy rates in most advanced
economies remain very low, central banks have
started to recognise the risks from commodity
price spikes to inflation. The European Central
Bank, on April 07, 2011, increased its policy
rate by 25 basis points to 1.25 per cent after
keeping it unchanged at historically low levels
for almost two years (Table VI.1). Emerging
market economies have continued with hikes in key policy rates as the balance of policy focus
needed to be shifted towards controlling
inflation. Given the recent increase in global
commodity prices and its potential impact on
generalised inflation going forward, EMEs are
likely to persist with anti-inflationary monetary
policy stance. Among the major EMEs, most
central banks raised their key policy rates during
the last quarter of 2010-11.
Risks from increase in global commodity
prices to domestic inflation have increased
significantly
VI.5 Global commodity prices have exhibited
uptrend since mid-2010 fuelled by fresh
concerns over supply prospects (Chart VI.2).
Political tensions in the MENA region
significantly impacted crude oil prices and average crude oil prices were at US$ 114.4 per
barrel for UK Brent category and US$ 108.6
per barrel for Dubai Fateh category during
March 2011. Accordingly, the Indian basket crude oil price averaged US$110.4 per barrel
in March 2011 given the composition of the
Indian basket. Despite ample spare capacity
with some OPEC member countries, crude oil prices are likely to remain at higher levels during
2011-12 as compared with 2010-11 given the
political uncertainties and tight demand-supply
balance.
Table VI.1 : Global Inflation Indicators |
(Per cent) |
Country/ Region |
Key Policy Rate |
Policy Rate
(as on April 28, 2011) |
Changes in Policy Rates (basis points) |
CPI Inflation
(y-o-y) |
Sep, 15. 08 to Aug. 23, 09 |
Since Aug. 23, 09 |
Mar-10 |
Mar-11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Developed Economies |
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
Cash Rate |
4.75 (Nov. 3, 2010) |
(-) 400 |
175 |
2.9^ |
3.3^ |
Canada |
Overnight Rate |
1.00 (Sep. 8, 2010) |
(-) 275 |
75 |
1.4 |
3.3 |
Euro area |
Interest Rate on Main Refinancing Operations |
1.25 (Apr 13, 2011) |
(-) 325 |
25 |
1.6 |
2.7 |
Japan |
Uncollateralised Overnight Call Rate |
0.0 to 0.10 (Oct. 5, 2010)* |
(-) 40 |
(-) 10 |
-1.1 |
0.0 |
UK |
Official Bank Rate |
0.50 (Mar. 5,2009) |
(-) 450 |
0 |
3.4 |
4.0 |
US |
Federal Funds Rate |
0.0 to 0.25 (Dec.16,2008)* |
(-) 200 |
0 |
2.3 |
2.7 |
Developing Economies |
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
Selic Rate |
12.00 (Apr.21, 2011) |
(-) 500 |
325 |
5.2 |
6.3 |
India |
Reverse Repo Rate |
5.75 (Mar 17, 2011) |
(-) 275 |
250 |
14.9 |
8.8 |
|
Repo Rate |
6.75 (Mar. 17, 2011) |
(-) 425 |
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
(-400) |
(100) |
|
|
China |
Benchmark 1-year Deposit Rate |
3.25 (Apr. 6, 2011) |
(-) 189 |
100 |
2.4 |
5.4 |
|
Benchmark 1-year Lending Rate |
6.31 (Apr. 6, 2011) |
(-) 216 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
(- 200) |
(500) |
|
|
Indonesia |
BI Rate |
6.75 (Feb. 4, 2011) |
(-) 275 |
25 |
3.4 |
6.7 |
Israel |
Key Rate |
3.00 (Apr. 1, 2011) |
(-) 375 |
250 |
3.2 |
4.3 |
Korea |
Base Rate |
3.00 (Mar.10, 2011) |
(-) 325 |
100 |
2.3 |
4.7 |
Philippines |
Reverse Repo Rate |
4.25 (Mar. 24, 2011) |
(-) 200 |
25 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
|
Repo Rate |
6.25 (Mar. 24, 2011) |
(-) 200 |
25 |
|
|
Russia |
Refinancing Rate |
8.00 (Feb. 28, 2011) |
(-) 25 |
(-) 275 |
6.5 |
9.4 |
South Africa |
Repo Rate |
5.50 (Nov. 19, 2010) |
(-) 500 |
(-) 150 |
5.1 |
4.1 |
Thailand |
1-day Repurchase Rate |
2.75 (Apr. 20, 2011) |
(-) 250 |
125 |
3.4 |
3.1 |
^ : Q4 of 2010-11 * : Change is worked out from the minimum point of target range.
Note: 1. For India, data on inflation pertain to CPI for Industrial Workers.
2. Figures in parentheses in column (3) indicate the effective dates when the policy rates were last revised.
3. Figures in parentheses in column (4 & 5) indicate the variation in the cash reserve ratio during the period.
Source : Websites of respective central banks/statistical agencies. |
 |
VI.6 The FAO food price index, which in
March 2011 recorded its historical peak since
inception in 1990, showed some moderation in
April 2011. However, the FAO, in its latest
World Food Outlook, indicated that increasing
diversion to cash crops could limit the
production capacity of individual food crops to
respond to high prices adequately to levels that
could be sufficient to alleviate market tightness.
Against this backdrop, the FAO has warned that
“…consumers may have little choice but to pay
higher prices for their food. With the pressure
on world prices of most commodities not
abating, the international community must
remain vigilant against further supply shocks in
2011 and be prepared”. Apart from oil
and food, metals and other primary products have
also exhibited considerable increase in prices.
VI.7 The earthquake in Japan in March 2011
led to a temporary decline in commodity prices
reflecting fears of a slowdown in demand from
Japan. However, prices have rebounded since
then and are likely to witness further pressure, especially in the case of metals and industrial
raw materials as reconstruction efforts could
lead to increased demand.
Pass-through of global inflation has been
divergent and incomplete
VI.8 The impact of changes in global
commodity prices on domestic inflation is
dependent on a number of factors. In the case
of fuel, where India is highly import dependent,
any increase in global prices has a significant
impact on domestic inflation. In the case of food
items, the magnitude of the spillover impact of
rising global food prices has been minimal,
especially in the case of cereals (Table VI.2).
This is mostly because prices of most food items
in India are predominantly affected by domestic
supply conditions as well as government’s
pricing policy rather than global trends.
However, increasing global prices rule out the
possibility of using imports as a measure for
food price control. In the case of primary input
commodities like cotton and rubber, global price
changes have been largely reflected in Indian
prices too, adding cost pressure on
manufactured products. Thus, global price
increases have both direct and indirect impact
on domestic inflation conditions.
Table VI. 2 : Movement in International and Domestic Commodity Prices |
Per cent |
Item |
Annual Variation March 2011 |
Mar-11 over Dec-10 |
International
Prices |
Domestic Prices
(WPI) |
International
Prices |
Domestic Prices (WPI) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Rice |
-1.9 |
2.7 |
-7.4 |
-2.0 |
Wheat |
65.7 |
0.8 |
3.3 |
0.5 |
Maize |
82.7 |
25.5 |
16.0 |
11.8 |
Soyabean oil |
42.8 |
19.1 |
-1.1 |
10.7 |
Sugar |
40.6 |
-7.5 |
-6.2 |
-1.7 |
Cotton |
167.6 |
98.1 |
36.7 |
34.4 |
Rubber |
63.8 |
49.1 |
19.3 |
11.6 |
Coal |
35.6 |
15.9 |
8.2 |
15.9 |
Petroleum |
37.0 |
6.3 |
20.7 |
0.0 |
Iron ore |
21.2 |
29.7 |
3.8 |
1.4 |
Fertilizers |
28.4 |
9.4 |
-1.2 |
3.1 |
Aluminium |
15.8 |
1.8 |
8.7 |
-0.8 |
Copper |
27.3 |
0.3 |
3.9 |
1.0 |
Gold |
27.9 |
33.4 |
2.4 |
1.3 |
Silver |
109.6 |
68.9 |
22.4 |
14.2 |
Source : World Bank and Ministry of Commerce and Industry, GOI. |
Sources of price pressures shift over three
distinct phases
VI.9 The nature of the inflation during 2010-11, in terms of contribution of specific groups
items in the WPI basket, changed over three
phases (Chart VI.3). In the first phase (between
March and July 2010), food group had the
highest contribution to the increase in WPI. In
the second phase (between July and November
2010), primary non-food articles, particularly
fibres like raw cotton, raw jute and raw silk had
the dominant contribution. The major source
of price pressures in the third phase (between
November 2010 and March 2011) came from
manufactured non-food products reflecting
generalisation of inflation.
Food inflation declines but price levels
remain firm reflecting structural
imbalances
VI.10 The decline in primary food articles
inflation on the expected lines with the arrival
of fresh crops in the market and government
interventions in the market has been one
comfort factor during Q4 of 2010-11. The
government has announced a number of
measures in the Union Budget for 2011-12 to
address the structural imbalances, especially
in the case of protein-rich food items. These
measures, however, could yield results only in
the medium term.
VI.11 The decline in food inflation has not
brought about significant decline in price
levels as the prices are ruling at higher levels
above the past trend, more so in the case of
protein-rich items (Chart VI.4). These point
towards weak supply response to both growing
demand and increasing prices, leading to
growing imbalances. Supply-augmenting
measures as well as policies to create more
efficient markets are critical to contain
inflation at moderate levels. Such structural
rigidities, unless addressed adequately, could
lead to a situation of persistent high level of
inflation which could constrain the efficacy of
monetary policy.
Volatility in food prices has increased
VI.12 Along with increase in inflation in food
articles in recent months, there has also been
increase in volatility in food prices, especially
in the case of vegetables, fruits and condiments
and spices (Chart VI.5). Increased volatility in
prices can influence inflation expectations
adversely and also lead to inefficiencies in
resource allocation as economic agents would
find it difficult to distinguish between absolute
and relative price changes. Also, the spike in
vegetable prices during 2010-11 has been
almost of the same magnitude as the previous
shock of 1998-99 (Chart VI.6). However, the
decline in prices following the spike has been
lower during the current spike.
Partial pass-through of global fuel
inflation increases medium-term risks
VI.13 Recent significant increases in
international crude oil and coal prices have
added further pressure on domestic inflation.
In recent period, the full impact of increase in
global oil price increases has been muted by
the administered price intervention as the passthrough
of increase in crude prices has been low
in the items under administered prices
(Chart VI.7). Empirical estimates show that
every 10 per cent increase in global crude prices,
if fully passed through to domestic prices, could
have a direct impact of 1 percentage point
increase in overall WPI inflation and the total
impact could be about 2 percentage points over
time as input cost increases translate to higher
output prices across sectors.
 |
 |
VI.14 Administered price interventions could
keep inflation low in the near-term, but with
significant risks to medium-term inflation
through the impact on higher fiscal deficit apart
from its impact on efficiency concerns. Even in
the case of freely priced products, the passthrough
remains incomplete. As against an
increase of 42 per cent y-o-y in March 2011 in
the Indian basket crude oil price, the domestic
price of non-administered fuels increased by
only 23 per cent. This indicates that prices could
increase going forward as domestic inflation
catch up with global trends. It is also important
to make further progress in deregulation of fuel
prices, particularly diesel. This would enable
demand to adjust appropriately to price signals,
reduce fiscal deficit and make the inflation
number more representative of underlying
inflation conditions.
Contribution of non-food manufactured
products to overall inflation increased with
rising input cost pressures
VI.15 The underlying contributors to inflation
have changed in recent months. The non-food
manufactured products group, broadly seen as
an indicator of demand-side and generalised
pressures on inflation, has contributed to
much of the high inflation in recent months even
as the contribution of food inflation declined
(Chart VI. 8). Fuel group and non-food primary
articles also continue to contribute significantly
to overall inflation, pointing towards persisting
and generalised inflationary pressures.
VI.16 After exhibiting a near stable path up to
the third quarter of 2010-11, manufactured nonfood
products inflation rose significantly in the last quarter with both the price index and monthover-
month seasonally adjusted changes
indicating significant build-up in price pressures
(Chart VI.9). Currently, the y-o-y inflation in
this group is at 7.0 per cent (March 2011),
much above the medium term trend. The
increasing price pressures in this category, is
important consideration in the conduct of
monetary policy. It indicates the spillover of
supply shocks to generalised inflation through
the input cost channel as well as the inflation
expectations. It can also impact the core
inflation through wage price spiral.
 |
 |
VI.17 The rise in non-food manufacturing
prices reflects the presence of significant
pricing power. In terms of the contribution to
increase in non-food manufactured prices during 2010-11, about three fourth of the
increase was driven by three major groups, viz.,
textiles, chemicals and metals (Chart VI.10).
Significant input cost pressures were visible
in these groups as the global prices of cotton,
petroleum products and metals had increased.
The producers’ ability to pass on these
increases to output prices point towards
prevalence of favourable demand conditions.
VI.18 During the last quarter of 2010-11, a
number of product groups under the
manufactured products group witnessed
increase in prices (Table VI.3). As a result, the
increase in price level during Q4 of 2010-11
was predominantly driven by non-food
manufacturing, reflecting rise in input costs
feeding into product prices.
 |
VI.19 The divergence in inflation between
major sub-groups in WPI continues to be large
with primary articles and ‘fuel and power’
group exhibiting significantly high inflation as compared to manufactured products group
(Chart VI.11.a). Manufactured products
inflation, however, increased in recent months.
Within the fuel group, coal prices increased
significantly in March 2011, while increase
in freely priced petroleum products prices led
to higher inflation for mineral oils. Electricity
price increases remained moderate
during 2010-11 but given the increases in coal
and mineral oils prices, electricity prices
are likely to rise in the near-term. Among
the major components, non-food primary
articles inflation remained high driving
input cost prices for manufactured products.
Decline in food inflation has, however,
been reflected in significant moderation
in essential commodities inflation (Chart
VI.11b).
Table VI.3 : Wholesale Price Inflation in India (2004-05=100) |
Per cent |
Commodity |
Weight |
(Year on Year, March) |
Quarterly Variation
(Mar-11 over Dec-10) |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
Change in
WPI |
W.C. |
Inflation |
W.C. |
Inflation |
W.C. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
All Commodities |
100.0 |
10.2 |
100.0 |
9.0 |
100.0 |
1.8 |
100.0 |
1. Primary Articles |
20.1 |
22.2 |
48.1 |
13.0 |
35.5 |
-2.4 |
-35.6 |
Food Articles |
14.3 |
20.6 |
31.9 |
9.5 |
18.2 |
-5.4 |
-56.8 |
Non-Food Articles |
4.3 |
20.4 |
8.6 |
25.9 |
13.6 |
7.5 |
21.6 |
Minerals |
1.5 |
37.9 |
7.7 |
12.2 |
3.5 |
-0.5 |
-0.8 |
2. Fuel Group |
14.9 |
13.8 |
20.1 |
12.9 |
22.1 |
5.3 |
45.9 |
i. Coal |
2.1 |
7.9 |
2.0 |
15.9 |
4.4 |
15.9 |
20.9 |
ii. Mineral Oils |
9.4 |
18.6 |
17.1 |
14.7 |
16.6 |
4.7 |
27.0 |
iii. Electricity |
3.5 |
3.4 |
1.0 |
3.6 |
1.1 |
-1.3 |
-2.0 |
3. Manufactured Products |
65.0 |
5.2 |
32.0 |
6.2 |
41.5 |
2.7 |
87.5 |
i. Food Products |
10.0 |
15.1 |
14.7 |
2.4 |
2.8 |
0.6 |
3.5 |
ii. Beverages, Tobacco & Tobacco Products |
1.8 |
8.1 |
1.5 |
7.3 |
1.5 |
5.2 |
5.1 |
iii. Textiles |
7.3 |
9.1 |
5.4 |
15.6 |
10.5 |
6.9 |
23.4 |
iv. Wood & Wood Products |
0.6 |
6.6 |
0.4 |
3.2 |
0.2 |
1.4 |
0.5 |
v. Paper & Paper Products |
2.0 |
2.5 |
0.5 |
7.2 |
1.4 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
vi. Leather & Leather Products |
0.8 |
2.5 |
0.2 |
-3.0 |
-0.3 |
-3.3 |
-1.3 |
vii. Rubber & Plastic Products |
3.0 |
3.7 |
1.0 |
9.0 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
4.0 |
viii. Chemicals and Chemical Products |
12.0 |
3.7 |
4.1 |
6.6 |
7.8 |
3.3 |
19.0 |
ix. Non-Metallic Mineral Products |
2.6 |
3.2 |
0.9 |
3.2 |
1.0 |
2.8 |
3.9 |
x. Basic Metals, Alloys and Metal Products |
10.7 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
9.3 |
10.6 |
4.1 |
23.1 |
xi. Machinery and Machine Tools |
8.9 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
0.4 |
1.7 |
xii. Transport Equipment and Parts |
5.2 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
3.3 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
4.2 |
Memo: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food Items (Composite)# |
24.3 |
18.5 |
46.6 |
6.8 |
21.0 |
-3.3 |
-53.3 |
Food Items (Protein Based)$ |
6.4 |
28.7 |
19.5 |
7.5 |
6.7 |
-0.4 |
-2.0 |
Manufactured Non-food Products |
55.0 |
3.3 |
17.2 |
7.0 |
38.8 |
3.1 |
84.0 |
WPI Excluding Food |
75.7 |
7.4 |
53.4 |
9.8 |
79.0 |
3.8 |
153.3 |
WPI Excluding Fuel |
85.1 |
9.6 |
79.9 |
8.3 |
77.9 |
1.1 |
54.1 |
Essential Commodities |
14.4 |
18.6 |
28.3 |
5.2 |
9.8 |
-1.7 |
-15.8 |
W.C.: Weighted contribution to increase in WPI.
#: Primary Food Articles + Manufactured Food Products.
$: Includes milk, ‘eggs, meat and fish’ and pulses. |
 |
CPI and WPI inflation converge, but elevated
levels point to generalised price pressures
VI.20 Inflation, as measured by various
consumer price indices, moderated from the
double digit levels, reaching single digit after
more than a year, but still remain high. Various
measures of inflation remained in the range of
8.8-9.1 per cent in March 2011. While the extent
of divergence between WPI and CPI inflation
narrowed significantly as food prices
moderated, both remained elevated indicating
generalisation of price pressures (Chart VI.12).
Inflation path remains sticky and risks
abound
VI.21 With the likelihood of spillovers from
past inflation and sustained impulses
transmitting from rising global commodity prices, the inflation path for 2011-12 looks
sticky, characterised by nominal rigidities.
Nominal rigidities mean that nominal prices of
goods and wages are temporarily rigid due to
price-setting behaviour and may not decline
immediately after a rise in inflation. Headline
inflation could remain elevated in the first half
of 2011-12 before declining gradually in the
second half but remain above the Reserve
Bank’s comfort level.
 |
VI.22 Even as food inflation moderated, it has
not led price levels returning to the trend,
suggesting that even if the transient shocks abate
price pressures may remain. The measures of
the Government announced in the Union
Budget, in terms of supply augmentation in key
protein rich items can only be expected to yield
results in the medium term. The impact of global
price spurts in the case of crude oil on domestic
inflation has so far been partial on account
of incomplete pass-through reflecting administrative price interventions. However, if
global prices remain firm at high levels, such
measures could lead to a significant fiscal
burden and thereby feed into medium term
inflation. Allowing further pass-through
especially for coal, where global prices have
increased significantly, and electricity, where
input costs have escalated, while raising
inflation in the near term will help in mediumterm
inflation management through the impact
on both demand adjustment and a favourable
impact on the fiscal position.
VI.23 The spillover of supply-side led inflation
on to generalised inflation appears to have been
faster in recent months through input cost
escalation. Given the risk that high and
persistent inflation in itself could jeopardize the
growth momentum and inclusive growth, policy
has to focus on anchoring inflationary
expectations as well as limiting the secondround
impact of supply shocks.
|