Reflecting favourable base effects and modest softening of manufactured products price pressures
aided by past monetary tightening, headline inflation exhibited moderation during August-
November 2010 relative to double digit levels experienced during March-July 2010. However,
renewed inflationary pressures became evident in December 2010 as headline WPI inflation
increased to 8.4 percent from 7.5 per cent in November 2010. New drivers are seen from fuel
and non-fuel international commodity prices and demand-supply imbalances in some food items.
Food inflation in particular has remained stubbornly in double digits for over two years now,
which has welfare costs. The sources of price pressure in this segment, however, could be largely
non-responsive to monetary policy actions. While inflation is likely to soften in coming months
it is likely to stay elevated above the earlier anticipated path. The upside risks to inflation,
particularly from the impact of supply rigidities and hardening commodity prices have increased,
which could dampen the expected impact of monetary policy to some extent. Policy response
ahead has to recognise these risks.
Inflation rebound in December 2010 was
largely driven by unanticipated factors
VI.1 Inflation resurgence during December
2010 was mainly led by a sudden spurt in prices
of primary food articles, especially vegetables,
and fuels. These together accounted for nearly
60 per cent of the WPI increase during the
month. Currently inflation remains above the
Reserve Bank’s comfort level and the long-term
average that was experienced during the precrisis
high growth phase. Price expectations also
remain elevated and price-level changes have
not yet dampened (Chart VI.1a). Base effects
have helped lower inflation on a year-on-year
basis, but price pressures persist (Chart VI.1b).
Food inflation moderated for a significant part
of the year but still remains elevated and has
witnessed renewed pressures in recent weeks.
Though non-food manufactured products
inflation remained range-bound during 2010-
11 so far, the price index has shown some uptick
in recent months and the risks to more
generalised inflation appear to have re-emerged.
VI.2 Apart from food inflation, inflationary
pressures have increased both from higher
global commodity prices and domestic demand.
Increasing trends in international commodity
prices, especially crude oil and metals, entail the risk that rising international commodity
prices will spill over into domestic inflation.
Furthermore, significant price pressures in
domestic non-food primary articles such as raw
cotton, raw rubber and minerals may lead to
increase in input costs for the manufacturing
sector. The persistent price pressures are also
evident from the high month-over-month
seasonally adjusted annualised inflation in
recent months (Chart VI.1d).
Changing dynamics underlying the
inflation rebound
VI.3 Since the second quarter review of
monetary policy in October 2010, there have
been significant changes in the factors
conditioning the inflation path. First, the
primary food articles inflation declined to single
digit after almost two years in November 2010
along the expected lines, but rose again on the
back of significant rise in prices of vegetables
like onion, tomato, okra, cabbage and brinjal
owing to loss of output caused by unseasonal
rains and supply chain rigidities. Some price
pressures emerged in condiments and spices as
well. Second, the global crude oil prices were
averaging at about US$ 75 per barrel in the
second quarter of 2010-11 with most forecasts
and even futures prices indicating only gradual recovery going forward. Contrary to the
expectations, crude oil prices have firmed up
significantly and crossed US$90 per barrel now.
This exerted upward pressure on prices of freely
priced products under the fuel group and
increased risks ahead for further pass-through.
Third, the global commodity prices, especially
food, primary commodities and metals have
increased substantially and the pass-through of
global increases to domestic prices have so far
been limited, suggesting risks from imported
inflation going forward. Finally, the sharp
increase in prices of non-food primary articles
and minerals, like raw cotton and iron ore could
put pressure on input costs for the manufactured
products. Therefore, a host of factors, both
anticipated and unanticipated, contributed to the
upside surprise on expected inflation trajectory.
 |
VI.4 As a result of newer factors and increased
risks, the inflation trajectory is likely to show some persistence and moderate only gradually.
In the Second Quarter Review of Monetary
Policy, the inflation projection for March 2011
was placed at 5.5 per cent. In the mid-Quarter
review of December 16, 2010, it was indicated
that the risks to this projection are on the upside.
Some of these upside risks have since
materialised. First, the seasonal decline in food
prices has still not occurred as a result of
persistent inflation in primary food items.
Second, global commodity prices are again on
the upswing. This occurred due to: (a) betterthan-
anticipated growth outlook for certain key
advanced economies, especially the US, (b)
supply-disruptions in a number of primary
commodities and (c) spillover effects of further
quantitative easing (QE-2) in the US. The FAO
food price index in December 2010 surpassed
the peak it reached during the global food price
shock of 2008, indicating significant price pressures. Crude oil prices have firmed up
further, putting pressure on the prices of the
freely priced petroleum products, even while
pass-through remains incomplete for the
administered items. Third, input cost pressures
from high primary commodity prices are
exerting further pressure on manufactured
products prices, combined with robust growth
and strong demand.
Global inflation outlook suggests growing
divergence and the associated asymmetry
in the stance of monetary policy
VI.5 The global inflation environment
continues to remain moderate but a rising
divergence in inflation trends between advanced
and emerging economies is perceptible (Table
VI.1). Some of the advanced economies like the
US and Japan face the macroeconomic challenge of generating some inflation to
stimulate economic activity. Others like the euro
area and UK are witnessing acceptable level of
core inflation but with rising headline inflation
and high rates of unemployment. Among
emerging economies, China recorded a two year
high in CPI inflation in November 2010. With
the exception of Malaysia, all major South East
Asian economies are facing inflationary
pressures, just as is the case with most Latin
American and East European economies.
VI.6 Subdued growth in advanced economies
along with slack labour market conditions and
well anchored inflation expectations provide
room to sustain policy accommodation.
However, advanced economies face enhanced
risks of higher long-term inflation expectations,
in the context of further fiscal stimulus being used in conjunction with enhanced monetary
stimulus. Policy rates in advanced economies
continue to remain near zero/very low as the
concerns relating to sustainability of recovery
still persist (Table VI.1). For EMEs, however,
further quantitative easing by advanced
economies and its potential impact on
commodity prices could raise the upside risks
to their domestic inflation. Several EMEs have
started normalisation of their monetary policy
stance, and the anti-inflationary monetary policy
could become a more common response, going
forward.
Table VI.1 : Global Inflation Indicators |
(Per cent) |
Country/ Region |
Key Policy Rate |
Policy Rate
(as on Jan. 21, 2011) |
Changes in Policy Rates (basis points) |
CPI Inflation
(y-o-y) |
Apr-09 to Aug-09 |
Since Sep-09 |
Dec- 09 |
Dec- 10 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Developed Economies |
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
Cash Rate |
4.75 (Nov. 3, 2010) |
(-)25 |
175 |
1.3 ^ |
2.8 ^ |
Canada |
Overnight Rate |
1.00 (Sep. 8, 2010) |
(-) 25 |
75 |
1.0 * |
2.0 * |
Euro area |
Interest Rate on Main Refinancing Operations |
1.00 (May 13,2009) |
(-) 50 |
0 |
0.9 |
2.2 |
Japan |
Uncollateralised Overnight Call Rate |
0.0 to 0.10 (Oct. 5, 2010) |
0 |
0 |
-1.9 * |
0.1 * |
UK |
Official Bank Rate |
0.50 (Mar. 5,2009) |
0 |
0 |
2.9 |
3.7 |
US |
Federal Funds Rate |
0.0 to 0.25 (Dec.16,2008) |
0 |
0 |
2.7 |
1.5 |
Developing Economies |
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
Selic Rate |
11.25 (Jan. 20, 2011) |
(-) 250 |
250 |
4.3 |
5.9 |
India |
Reverse Repo Rate |
5.25 (Nov. 2, 2010) |
(-)25 |
200 |
13.5 * |
8.3 * |
|
Repo Rate |
6.25 (Nov. 2, 2010) |
(-) 25 |
150(100) |
|
|
China |
Benchmark 1-year Deposit Rate |
2.75 (Dec.26, 2010) |
0 |
50 |
1.9 |
4.6 |
|
Benchmark 1-year Lending Rate |
5.81 (Dec.26, 2010) |
0 |
50 (350) |
|
|
Indonesia |
BI Rate |
6.50 (Aug. 5, 2009) |
(-) 125 |
0 |
2.8 |
7.0 |
Israel |
Key Rate |
2.00 (Oct. 1, 2010) |
(-)25 |
150 |
3.9 |
2.7 |
Korea |
Base Rate |
2.75 (Jan 13, 2011) |
0 |
75 |
2.8 |
3.5 |
Philippines |
Reverse Repo Rate |
4.00 (Jul. 9, 2009) |
(-)75 |
0 |
4.4 |
3.0 |
|
Repo Rate |
6.00 (Jul. 9, 2009) |
(-)75 |
0 |
|
|
Russia |
Refinancing Rate |
7.75 (Jun. 1, 2010) |
(-)225 |
(-)300 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
South Africa |
Repo Rate |
5.50 (Nov. 19, 2010) |
(-)250 |
(-) 150 |
6.3 |
3.5 |
Thailand |
1-day Repurchase Rate |
2.25 (Jan.12, 2011) |
(-) 25 |
100 |
3.5 |
3.0 |
^ : Q2 of 2010-11 * : November
Note: 1. For India, data on inflation pertain to CPI for Industrial Workers.
2. Figures in parentheses in column (3) indicate the dates when the policy rates were last revised.
3. Figures in parentheses in column (5) indicate the variation in the cash reserve ratio during the period.
Source: Websites of respective central banks/statistical agencies. |
Risks of imported inflation from rising
global commodity prices have amplified
VI.7 Upside risks to domestic inflation
emanate from further hardening of global
commodity prices, which have already started
to rise since mid-2010. Global non-fuel
commodity prices, especially food and metals,
have been firming up since July 2010. Supply
disruptions in many commodities and
indications of further quantitative easing by
some advanced economies initiated these trends
(Chart VI.2). Since October 2010, international
commodity price pressures have been
exacerbated by hardening of global crude oil
prices. On the back of easy global liquidity and
severe winters in Europe and US, global crude
oil prices crossed US$90 per barrel, in spite of
ample spare capacities with some OPEC
members. Simultaneous increase in prices of a number of commodities poses the risk of higher
imported inflation.
VI.8 The magnitude of the spillover impact of
rising prices of commodities in the world
markets to India’s inflation path would depend
upon four factors: (a) the extent of increase in
world prices of imported items, (b) movements
in the exchange rate of rupee, (c) share of
imported items in India’s consumption basket,
and (d) the degree of pass-through that may be
suppressed by policy intervention in the
domestic market. The pass-through from global
prices to domestic prices has been particularly
low in case of wheat, maize, sugar and edible
oils (Table VI.2). These could be attributed to
local supply conditions and administrative price
measures in place. With significant increase in
world prices of cotton, iron ore, gold and silver,
domestic wholesale prices also rose
significantly, though the pass-through was
incomplete in many cases. Overall, domestic
prices are now significantly impacted by the
global commodity price movements, and hence,
rising international prices is an important source
of upward risk to domestic inflation.
Persistence of high food inflation reflects
both structural imbalances and supply
chain rigidities
VI.9 Persistence of food inflation has become
a primary impediment to faster moderation of
inflation. The expected degree of correction in food prices after a normal monsoon did not
materialise. Primary food articles with a weight of 14.3 per cent in WPI, contributed 38.6 per
cent to the increase in overall WPI during Q3
of 2010-11 (Table VI.3). The decomposition
of food inflation indicates that during the
recent period the key drivers of food inflation
are non-cereals (Chart VI.3). These were, apart
from vegetables, the protein rich items. The
supply response to growing demand in some
of these items has been weak, leading to
growing imbalances. Medium-term supply
augmenting measures would be critical to
contain the persistent pressure of inflation from
this source. Import option to deal with this
challenge on a permanent basis remains
limited, given the size of demand and high
global food prices.
Table VI. 2 : Movement in International
and Domestic Commodity Prices |
(Per cent change in December over March 2010) |
Item |
International Prices |
Domestic Prices (WPI ) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Rice |
5.9 |
1.9 |
Wheat |
60.4 |
-0.7 |
Maize |
57.4 |
12.0 |
Soyabean oil |
44.5 |
7.4 |
Sugar |
50.0 |
-8.9 |
Cotton |
95.8 |
31.6 |
Coal |
21.9 |
0.0 |
Crude Petroleum |
13.5 |
1.0 (9.5*) |
Iron ore |
80.3 |
23.9 |
Fertilizers |
29.9 |
5.9 |
Aluminium |
6.6 |
2.4 |
Copper |
22.6 |
-0.7 |
Gold |
24.9 |
31.7 |
Silver |
71.2 |
39.7 |
Source: World Bank and Ministry of Commerce and Industry, GOI.
* Mineral Oils. |
 |
VI.10 Extended spells of South-West monsoon
and unseasonal rains in certain parts of the country have led to loss of vegetables output.
Given its perishable nature and also the lack
of adequate warehousing and storage facilities,
the prices of vegetables increased significantly
in December 2010 (Table VI.4). This is in contrast to the trend witnessed in previous
years as the prices of vegetables usually show
some seasonal decline during December
following the arrival of winter crop in the
market.
 |
Table VI.3 : Wholesale Price Inflation in India (2004 - 05 = 100) |
Per cent |
Commodity |
Weight
|
2009-10 (March-10) |
Year on Year Variation December-10 |
Financial Year Variation (Mar-10 to Dec-10) |
Quarterly Variation (Sep-10 to Dec-10) |
Inflation
(y-o-y) |
C * |
Change in WPI |
C* |
Change in WPI |
C* |
Change in WPI |
C* |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
All Commodities |
100.0 |
10.2 |
100.0 |
8.4 |
100.0 |
6.1 |
100.0 |
1.8 |
100.0 |
1. |
Primary Articles |
20.1 |
22.2 |
48.1 |
16.5 |
48.0 |
13.9 |
55.7 |
4.5 |
62.7 |
|
Food Articles |
14.3 |
20.6 |
31.9 |
13.5 |
28.5 |
14.2 |
40.2 |
3.9 |
38.6 |
|
i. |
Rice |
1.8 |
8.1 |
1.7 |
1.2 |
0.3 |
1.9 |
0.7 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
|
ii. |
Wheat |
1.1 |
14.7 |
2.0 |
-5.1 |
-0.9 |
-0.7 |
-0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
iii. |
Pulses |
0.7 |
25.0 |
2.3 |
-10.9 |
-1.5 |
-5.0 |
-0.9 |
-3.8 |
-2.1 |
|
iv. |
Vegetables |
1.7 |
13.6 |
2.2 |
24.9 |
7.0 |
70.4 |
19.4 |
18.7 |
23.6 |
|
v. |
Fruits |
2.1 |
18.2 |
3.7 |
20.4 |
5.2 |
12.5 |
4.6 |
7.3 |
9.0 |
|
vi. |
Milk |
3.2 |
24.9 |
8.6 |
18.2 |
8.0 |
6.8 |
4.4 |
0.8 |
1.7 |
|
vii. |
Eggs, Fish and Meat |
2.4 |
35.5 |
8.6 |
19.2 |
6.8 |
13.8 |
6.9 |
-0.1 |
-0.2 |
|
Non-Food Articles |
4.3 |
20.4 |
8.6 |
22.3 |
11.9 |
14.2 |
10.9 |
6.8 |
18.0 |
|
i. |
Raw Cotton |
0.7 |
20.0 |
1.4 |
31.8 |
3.0 |
31.6 |
4.0 |
8.8 |
4.3 |
|
ii. |
Oilseeds |
1.8 |
6.7 |
1.2 |
2.5 |
0.6 |
3.5 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
|
iii. |
Sugarcane |
0.6 |
53.3 |
2.7 |
49.8 |
2.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Minerals |
1.5 |
37.9 |
7.7 |
27.7 |
7.5 |
10.3 |
4.4 |
4.2 |
6.0 |
2. |
Fuel Group |
14.9 |
13.8 |
20.1 |
11.2 |
20.1 |
7.1 |
18.0 |
1.7 |
14.3 |
|
i. |
Coal |
2.1 |
7.9 |
2.0 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
ii. |
Mineral Oils |
9.4 |
18.6 |
17.1 |
15.8 |
18.3 |
9.5 |
15.7 |
2.5 |
14.0 |
|
iii. |
Electricity |
3.5 |
3.4 |
1.0 |
5.0 |
1.7 |
5.0 |
2.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
3. |
Manufactured Products |
65.0 |
5.2 |
32.0 |
4.5 |
31.9 |
2.6 |
25.8 |
0.8 |
25.0 |
|
i. |
Food Products |
10.0 |
15.1 |
14.7 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
8.8 |
|
|
of which: Sugar |
1.7 |
44.3 |
7.8 |
-9.9 |
-2.9 |
-8.9 |
-3.4 |
4.7 |
5.0 |
|
|
Edible Oils |
3.0 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
5.3 |
1.7 |
7.0 |
2.9 |
1.9 |
2.7 |
|
ii. |
Cotton Textiles |
2.6 |
12.7 |
2.7 |
14.1 |
3.7 |
9.4 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
4.4 |
|
iii. |
Man Made Fibres |
1.7 |
10.5 |
1.4 |
11.9 |
1.8 |
5.3 |
1.1 |
3.2 |
2.3 |
|
iv. |
Chemicals and Chemical Products |
12.0 |
3.7 |
4.1 |
4.4 |
5.6 |
2.6 |
4.5 |
0.6 |
3.2 |
|
|
of which : Fertilisers |
2.7 |
1.9 |
0.4 |
6.7 |
1.7 |
5.9 |
2.1 |
-0.2 |
-0.2 |
|
v. |
Non-Metallic Mineral Products |
2.6 |
3.2 |
0.9 |
3.6 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
|
|
of which: Cement & Lime |
1.4 |
2.3 |
0.4 |
2.5 |
0.5 |
-0.7 |
-0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
vi. |
Basic Metals, Alloys and Metal Products |
10.7 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
7.9 |
9.5 |
4.3 |
7.3 |
0.6 |
3.3 |
|
|
of which: Iron and Semis |
1.6 |
-0.2 |
0.0 |
9.3 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
0.4 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
|
vii. |
Machinery and Machine Tools |
8.9 |
1.5 |
1.3 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
1.3 |
1.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
of which: Electrical Machinery |
2.3 |
-1.1 |
-0.3 |
2.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
|
viii. |
Transport Equipment and Parts |
5.2 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
2.6 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
|
Memo: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food Items (Composite)# |
24.3 |
18.5 |
46.6 |
8.6 |
29.0 |
9.2 |
41.4 |
3.1 |
47.4 |
|
Food Items (Protein Based)$ |
6.4 |
28.7 |
19.5 |
14.3 |
13.3 |
7.9 |
10.5 |
-0.1 |
-0.5 |
|
Manufactured Non-food Products |
55.0 |
3.3 |
17.2 |
5.3 |
31.5 |
3.0 |
24.6 |
0.6 |
16.2 |
|
WPI Excluding Food |
75.7 |
7.4 |
53.4 |
8.4 |
71.0 |
4.9 |
58.6 |
1.3 |
52.6 |
|
WPI Excluding Fuel |
85.1 |
9.6 |
79.9 |
7.9 |
79.9 |
5.9 |
82.0 |
1.9 |
85.7 |
|
Essential Commodities |
14.4 |
18.6 |
28.3 |
4.5 |
9.2 |
5.5 |
15.0 |
2.1 |
18.8 |
* : Weighted contribution to increase in WPI. # : Primary Food Articles + Manufactured Food Products.
$ : Includes milk, ‘eggs, fish and meat’ and pulses. |
Table VI.4 : Increase in Vegetables Wholesale Price Index |
Per cent |
Commodity |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
November |
December |
November |
December |
Variation |
C* |
Variation |
C* |
Variation |
C* |
Variation |
C* |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
All Vegetables |
1.7 |
100.0 |
-14.3 |
100.0 |
2.1 |
100.0 |
41.0 |
100 |
Potato |
-12.1 |
-137.9 |
-27.3 |
-31.7 |
-0.5 |
-2.1 |
12.6 |
2.9 |
Onion |
8.5 |
64.1 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
11.0 |
85.5 |
46.4 |
19.9 |
Tomato |
46.7 |
359.6 |
-42.8 |
-56.1 |
-14.9 |
-93.7 |
116.8 |
31.1 |
Cauliflower |
-12.1 |
-81.3 |
-4.6 |
-3.2 |
-18.6 |
-137.9 |
33.4 |
10.0 |
Brinjal |
-14.1 |
-132.7 |
-13.8 |
-13.0 |
22.5 |
127.6 |
65.1 |
22.5 |
Okra (Lady Finger) |
7.2 |
23.1 |
17.8 |
7.1 |
9.0 |
26.2 |
35.4 |
5.6 |
Cabbage |
-14.8 |
-92.2 |
-5.9 |
-3.6 |
42.1 |
236.9 |
19.1 |
7.6 |
* Weighted contribution to overall increase in vegetable price index (in per cent). |
Contribution of non-food manufactured
products inflation to headline inflation
remains steady
VI.11 On a year-on-year basis, the moderation
in inflation witnessed up to November 2010 was
largely on account of the decline in the
contribution of food inflation to overall inflation
(Chart VI.4). The contribution of manufactured
non-food products increased marginally in
November 2010 and remained unchanged in
December 2010. Fuel group and non-food
primary articles also continue to contribute
significantly to overall inflation pointing
towards persisting and generalised inflationary
pressures.
VI.12 Among the major sub-groups of WPI,
inflation remains higher in primary articles and
‘fuel and power’ group relative to manufactured
products (Chart VI.5.a). Manufactured products inflation moderated largely on account of
decline in sugar prices. Currently, all segments
of primary articles - food, non-food and minerals
are showing double-digit inflation. Non-food
primary articles inflation has been exacerbated
by revision in sugarcane index by about 50 per
cent in March 2010 and increase in iron ore and
raw cotton prices. Iron ore prices have doubled
since December 2009, while raw cotton prices
increased by more than 42 per cent since
September 2010. Inflation in essential
commodities declined significantly, more on
account of the high base recorded a year ago.
Non-food manufactured products inflation
remains range-bound, but some indication
of price pressures visible
VI.13 Manufactured non-food products, which
account for 55 percent weight in the WPI basket
and seen as a broad indicator of generalised inflationary pressures exhibited near stable
inflation path during 2010-11 (Chart VI.6). The
flattening of inflation in non-food manufactured
items in past few months could be partly in
response to the monetary tightening of the past,
but upside risks to this segment persist. This is
corroborated by both upward trend in the price
index and high month-over-month seasonally
adjusted annualised inflation. This could largely
be on account of the significant input cost
pressures emanating from high primary
commodity prices translating to higher output
prices in the wake of buoyant demand.
Divergence between CPI and WPI
inflation narrows, but elevated levels point
to persistence of welfare costs
VI.14 Inflation, as measured by various
consumer price indices, generally moderated
during 2010-11, with some reversal witnessed
in December 2010 (for CPI-Agricultural and
Rural Labourers). Various measures of inflation
remained in the range of 8.0-8.4 per cent in
November/December 2010. While the extent of
divergence between WPI and CPI inflation
narrowed significantly, both remained elevated
leading to significant welfare costs (Chart VI.7).
Upside risks to inflation have increased,
suggesting the need for sustained antiinflationary
policy focus
VI.15 The underlying inflation trends suggest
that the return of inflation to a more acceptable level could at best be gradual.
Some of the domestic supply-side pressures
could be transient in nature, and administrative
steps to curb the price spiral and seasonal
correction could soften prices, going ahead.
However, the expected moderation can
get offset by rising risk of transmission
from increasing global commodity prices.
Hardening international commodity prices,
particularly petroleum, minerals and metal
prices have already begun to seep through to
domestic prices. As a result, some price
pressures could persist, even as inflation softens.
Suppressed inflation in the near-term due to
administrative price interventions to insulate
domestic prices from global price surges,
particularly in respect of some of the petroleum
products, could also become more open at a later
stage.
 |
 |
VI.16 Even if inflation softens in the near-term,
sustaining a low inflation regime would require
addressing structural issues at a micro level. In
the near-term, closer monitoring of production,
consumption and price patterns in specific
commodities with a focus on supply-chain
management to contain market pressures would
be helpful. There is also a need to focus on
supply augmentation in the short-run, inter alia,
through timely imports, wherever feasible.
VI.17 While inflation upsurge has largely come
from supply-side elements, monetary policy
would need to factor in near-term risks to
inflation from high input cost pressures
transmitting to output prices. The risks to
generalised inflation cannot be overlooked as
inflation expectations are currently ruling high.
Anchoring inflationary expectations would be
necessary to mute the second-round impact of
supply-side shocks. |