The global financial market conditions largely reflected concerns relating to sovereign debt in
the Euro-zone, ample global liquidity resulting from quantitative easing (QE2) in the US and
uncertain growth outlook in other advanced economies. Indian markets functioned in an orderly
manner although there was a rise in equity prices in the third quarter of 2010-11, partly driven
by higher portfolio flows, in line with the trend in other EMEs. In January 2011, equity prices
moderated, partly reflecting market expectations of tighter monetary policy in response to
higher inflation. The forex market also remained orderly and witnessed two way movements.
Severe tightness in liquidity that developed in the last few months of 2010 impacted rates in
different segments of the money market. The interest rates/yields on overnight, CPs, CDs, CBLO,
Treasury Bills, government dated securities and bank deposits increased. Housing prices in
major cities rose in general in the second quarter of 2010-11 and to contain excessive leveraging
in the housing sector, the Reserve Bank tightened prudential measures for housing credit.
Global asset price trends and capital
inflows influenced the domestic markets
V.1 Renewed concerns regarding sovereign
debt crisis in the Euro area and the multi-paced
global recovery dominated global financial
markets, which underpinned frequent re-pricing
of risks. The emerging market economies
(EMEs) attracted greater portfolio flows in
search of better returns, given the easy
availability of liquidity in developed countries
especially after the announcement of QE2.
These flows, in turn, exerted upward pressures
on currencies and asset prices in EMEs, leading
some of these economies to resort to
macroprudential measures and soft capital
controls.
V.2 The Indian financial markets remained
orderly, notwithstanding the impact of global
developments and tight liquidity conditions in
domestic markets. Call rate firmed up in step
with policy rates and tight liquidity conditions.
It mostly remained above the upper bound of
the LAF corridor during the third quarter of
2010-11. Both commercial paper (CP) and
certificate of deposit (CD) markets remained
active as alternative sources of finance. The
yield curve for Government Securities (G-Sec) shifted, reflecting expectation of policy rate
changes in an inflationary environment. The
Indian Rupee appreciated moderately against
the US dollar and stock prices rose on the back
of strong foreign portfolio inflows. Prices in the
housing market in general continued the rising
trend during the second quarter of 2010-11.
Frequent re-pricing of risks in the
international financial markets reflected
persisting uncertainties
V.3 Sovereign risks in the Euro-area
resurfaced during the fourth quarter of 2010
which resulted in higher G-Sec yields and
widening of CDS spreads (Charts V.1 a and b).
Increased capital inflows into the EMEs exerted
upward pressures on their currencies and equity
prices (Table V.1).
V.4 Indian financial markets, particularly the
equity and foreign exchange markets were
impacted by the global developments. Widening
interest rate differential due to divergent
monetary policies followed by advanced
economies and India led corporates to take
greater recourse to external commercial
borrowings (ECBs). Easy global liquidity and
the strong growth prospects of the Indian
economy encouraged inflows from foreign institutional investors (FIIs) seeking higher
returns. The rupee appreciated against major
currencies during the beginning of the third
quarter of 2010-11, mainly due to strong FII
inflows, but corrected subsequently, in line with
the movement of the US dollar vis-a-vis other
major currencies and moderation of FII inflows
(Table V.2).
Policy measures were taken to manage
liquidity conditions as money market rates
hardened
V.5 During the third quarter of 2010-11, there
was a tightening of liquidity on account of
persistence of large government cash balances,
above-trend currency expansion and mismatch between growth in bank credit and deposits. The
call rate mostly remained above the upper bound
of the LAF corridor during the third quarter,
reflecting the tight liquidity conditions (Chart
V.2a). The rates in the collateralised segments
(which accounted for more than 80 per cent of
the total volume) generally moved in tandem,
with the call rate albeit below it. In order to
stabilise overnight inter-bank rates closer to the
operative policy rate, the Reserve Bank
implemented liquidity management measures
(see Table IV.2 of Chapter IV for details). The
activity in the collateralised borrowing and
lending obligation (CBLO) and market repo
segments showed marginal moderation vis-avis
the uncollateralised market, reflecting demand for funds in excess of available
securities for collateral backing (Chart V.2b).
Secondary market yields on CDs and CPs
witnessed higher increases by the end of the
third quarter as compared to the overnight rates
as well as the Treasury Bills of comparable
maturity (Table V.3, Chart V.2c).
Table V.1 : Currency and Stock Price Movement in EMEs |
(Per cent) |
Appreciation (+)/Depreciation (-) of the US Dollar |
Stock Price Variations |
Items |
End-March 2009@ |
End-March 2010@ |
End-Dec. 2010* |
Items |
End-March 2009@ |
End-March 2010@ |
End-Dec. 2010* |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
Japanese Yen |
0.7 |
5.9 |
15.2 |
Indonesia |
-41.4 |
93.7 |
33.3 |
Chinese Renminbi |
2.6 |
0.1 |
3.3 |
(Jakarta Composite) |
|
|
|
Russian Ruble |
-30.8 |
15.4 |
-3.7 |
Brazil (Bovespa) |
-32.9 |
71.9 |
-1.5 |
Turkish Lira |
-20.5 |
9.7 |
-1.7 |
Thailand (SET Composite) |
-47.2 |
82.6 |
31.1 |
Indian Rupee |
-20.9 |
12.9 |
0.5 |
India (BSE Sensex) |
-37.9 |
80.5 |
17.0 |
Indonesian Rupiah |
-21.1 |
28.6 |
1.2 |
South Korea (KOSPI) |
-29.2 |
40.3 |
21.2 |
Malaysian Ringgit |
-12.4 |
11.8 |
6.5 |
China |
-31.7 |
31.0 |
-9.7 |
South Korea Won |
-28.4 |
22.3 |
0.5 |
(Shanghai Composite) |
|
|
|
Thai Baht |
-11.4 |
9.8 |
7.6 |
Taiwan (Taiwan Index) |
-39.2 |
52.0 |
13.3 |
Argentine Peso |
-14.8 |
-4.1 |
-2.5 |
Russia (RTS) |
-66.4 |
128.0 |
12.6 |
Brazilian Real |
-24.6 |
30.4 |
7.2 |
Malaysia (KLSI) |
-30.1 |
51.3 |
15.0 |
Mexican Peso |
-24.9 |
14.6 |
0.2 |
Singapore (Straits Times) |
-43.5 |
69.9 |
10.5 |
@ : Year-on-year variation. * : Variation over End-March.
Source : Bloomberg, IFS, IMF. |
Table V.2 : Domestic Financial Markets at a Glance |
Year/ Month |
Money Market |
Bond Market |
Forex Market |
Stock Markets |
G-Sec |
Corporate Bonds |
Call Money daily turnover (`crore) |
Call rates* (Per cent) |
Avg daily LAF (`crore) |
Daily Turn- over^ (`Crore) |
10- year yield (Per cent) |
Daily Turn- over (` Crore) |
Yield - AAA 5-Yr Bonds |
Daily inter bank turnover (US$ mn) |
Exch ange rate @ (`/US$) |
RBI’s net purchase (+)/sale(-) (US$ mn) |
Daily NSE turnover (`crore) |
CNX Nifty ** |
BSE Sen sex ** |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
2008-09 |
22,436 |
7.06 |
2,885 |
10,879 |
7.54 |
610 |
10.07 |
34,812 |
45.92 |
-34,922† |
11,325 |
3713 |
12303 |
2009-10 |
15,924 |
3.24 |
1,00,015 |
13,936 |
7.23 |
1,644 |
8.23 |
30,107 |
47.42 |
-2,505† |
16,959 |
4658 |
15585 |
Oct-09 |
15,776 |
3.17 |
1,01,675 |
12,567 |
7.33 |
1,474 |
8.50 |
28,402 |
46.72 |
75 |
18,148 |
4994 |
16826 |
Nov-09 |
13,516 |
3.19 |
1,01,719 |
17,281 |
7.33 |
1,571 |
8.14 |
27,599 |
46.57 |
-36 |
16,224 |
4954 |
16684 |
Dec-09 |
13,302 |
3.24 |
68,522 |
14,110 |
7.57 |
1,457 |
8.23 |
27,439 |
46.63 |
-25 |
13,948 |
5100 |
17090 |
Jan-10 |
12,822 |
3.23 |
81,027 |
12,614 |
7.62 |
2,769 |
8.32 |
32,833 |
45.96 |
0 |
17,813 |
5156 |
17260 |
Feb-10 |
13,618 |
3.17 |
78,661 |
12,535 |
7.79 |
1,988 |
8.53 |
34,040 |
46.33 |
0 |
12,257 |
4840 |
16184 |
Mar-10 |
17,624 |
3.51 |
37,640 |
8,544 |
7.94 |
3,196 |
8.61 |
32,755 |
45.50 |
155 |
13,631 |
5178 |
17303 |
Apr-10 |
16,374 |
3.49 |
57,150 |
14,242 |
8.01 |
3,342 |
8.37 |
36,821 |
44.5 |
0 |
13,828 |
5295 |
19679 |
May-10 |
16,786 |
3.83 |
32,798 |
24,225 |
7.56 |
3,305 |
8.15 |
40,243 |
45.81 |
0 |
12,937 |
5053 |
16845 |
Jun-10 |
14,258 |
5.16 |
-47,347 |
21,300 |
7.59 |
2,473 |
8.21 |
36,953 |
46.57 |
110 |
13,005 |
5188 |
17300 |
Jul-10 |
18,954 |
5.54 |
-46,653 |
13,691 |
7.69 |
2,899 |
8.27 |
34,252 |
46.84 |
0 |
12,661 |
5360 |
17848 |
Aug-10 |
15,916 |
5.17 |
-1,048 |
16,919 |
7.93 |
2,291 |
8.52 |
36,528 |
46.57 |
0 |
14,182 |
5457 |
18177 |
Sep-10 |
17,212 |
5.50 |
-24,155 |
16,215 |
7.96 |
2,508 |
8.52 |
37,574 |
46.06 |
260 |
15,708 |
5811 |
19353 |
Oct-10 |
17,840 |
6.39 |
-61,658 |
14,029 |
7.68 |
2,299 |
8.58 |
49,880P |
44.41 |
450 |
17,165 |
6069 |
20250 |
Nov-10 |
17,730 |
6.81 |
-99,311 |
10,193 |
8.03 |
1,843 |
8.64 |
44,104P |
45.02 |
870 |
17,333 |
6055 |
20126 |
Dec-10 |
18,872 |
6.67 |
-1,20,495 |
9,849 |
8.03 |
1,723 |
8.89 |
34,894P |
45.16 |
- |
13,440 |
5971 |
19228 |
* : Average of daily weighted call money rates. ^: Average of daily outright turnover in Central Government dated securities
@: Average of closing rates. **: Average of daily closing indices. † : Cumulative for the financial year.
NSE: National Stock Exchange of India Limited. P: Provisional - : Not available.
Note : In col 4 (-)ve indicates injection of liquidity while (+)ve indicates absorption of liquidity. |
V.6 The average fortnightly issuance of CDs
during the third quarter was higher than that
in the previous quarter; issuances of CPs also
increased as companies accessed alternative
avenues for funds, given the tight liquidity
conditions. Leasing and finance, and
manufacturing companies continued to be the major issuers of CPs (Table V.4). The
Weighted Average Effective Interest
Rate (WAEIR) on CDs and Weighted
Average Discount Rate (WADR) of CPs in
the primary markets increased during
the third quarter reflecting demand for
funds.
Table V.3 : Activity in Money Market Segments |
(` Crore) |
Year/Month |
Average Daily Volume (One leg) |
Commercial Paper |
Certificates of Deposit |
Call Money |
Market Repo |
CBLO |
Outstanding |
WADR (%) |
Outstanding |
WAEIR (%) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
Sep-09 |
8,059 |
27,978 |
62,388 |
79,228 |
5.04 |
2,16,691 |
5.30 |
Oct-09 |
7,888 |
23,444 |
58,313 |
98,835 |
5.06 |
2,27,227 |
4.70 |
Nov-09 |
6,758 |
22,529 |
54,875 |
1,03,915 |
5.17 |
2,45,101 |
4.86 |
Dec-09 |
6,651 |
20,500 |
55,338 |
90,305 |
5.40 |
2,48,440 |
4.92 |
Jan-10 |
6,411 |
14,565 |
50,571 |
91,564 |
4.80 |
2,82,284 |
5.65 |
Feb-10 |
6,809 |
19,821 |
63,645 |
97,000 |
4.99 |
3,09,390 |
6.15 |
Mar-10 |
8,812 |
19,150 |
60,006 |
75,506 |
6.29 |
3,41,054 |
6.07 |
Apr-10 |
8,187 |
20,319 |
50,891 |
98,769 |
5.37 |
3,36,807 |
5.56 |
May-10 |
8,393 |
17,610 |
42,274 |
1,09,039 |
6.85 |
3,40,343 |
5.17 |
Jun-10 |
7,129 |
9,481 |
31,113 |
99,792 |
6.82 |
3,21,589 |
6.37 |
Jul-10 |
9,477 |
12,011 |
29,102 |
1,12,704 |
6.93 |
3,24,810 |
6.69 |
Aug-10 |
7,958 |
15,553 |
45,181 |
1,26,549 |
7.32 |
3,41,616 |
7.17 |
Sep-10 |
8,606 |
15,927 |
53,223 |
1,12,003 |
7.82 |
3,37,322 |
7.34 |
Oct-10 |
8,920 |
14,401 |
43,831 |
1,49,620 |
12.15 |
3,43,353 |
7.67 |
Nov-10 |
8,865 |
9,967 |
32,961 |
1,17,793 |
12.22 |
3,32,982 |
8.16 |
Dec-10 |
9,436 |
12,989 |
43,784 |
1,02,156@ |
12.52 |
3,28,566 # |
9.01 |
@: As on December 15, 2010 # : As on December 17, 2010
CBLO: Collateralised Borrowing and Lending Obligation
WADR: Weighted Average Discount Rate
WAEIR : Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate. |
 |
V.7 The yield on Treasury Bills in the primary
market firmed up during the third quarter of
2010-11 (Table V.5). The calendar for issuance
of Treasury Bills for the fourth quarter of 2010-
11, released on December 31, 2010, projected
mobilisation of `17,000 crore, over and above
the rollover during the quarter.
Table V.4 : Major Issuers of Commercial Paper |
(` Crore) |
End of Period |
Leasing and Finance |
Manufacturing |
Financial Institutions |
Total
Outstanding |
Amount |
Share (%) |
Amount |
Share (%) |
Amount |
Share (%) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
Mar-09 |
27,183 |
62 |
12,738 |
29 |
4,250 |
10 |
44,171 |
Jun-09 |
34,437 |
50 |
23,454 |
34 |
10,830 |
16 |
68,721 |
Sep-09 |
31,648 |
40 |
31,509 |
40 |
16,071 |
20 |
79,228 |
Dec-09 |
36,027 |
40 |
42,443 |
47 |
11,835 |
13 |
90,305 |
Mar-10 |
39,477 |
52 |
22,344 |
30 |
13,685 |
18 |
75,506 |
Jun-10 |
42,572 |
43 |
43,330 |
43 |
13,890 |
14 |
99,792 |
Aug-10 |
57,161 |
45 |
55,933 |
44 |
13,455 |
11 |
1,26,549 |
Sep-10 |
58,098 |
52 |
40,485 |
36 |
13,420 |
12 |
1,12,003 |
Oct-10 |
80,305 |
54 |
54,894 |
37 |
14,421 |
9 |
1,49,620 |
Nov-10 |
58,871 |
50 |
45,457 |
39 |
13,465 |
11 |
1,17,793 |
Dec-10 |
53,329 |
52 |
35,767 |
35 |
13,060 |
13 |
1,02,156 @ |
@ As on Dec 15, 2010 |
Table V.5 : Treasury Bills in the
Primary Market |
Year/
Month |
Notified
Amount
(` crore) |
Average Implicit Yield at
Minimum Cut-off Price (Per cent) |
91-day |
182-day |
364-day |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2008-09 |
2,99,000 |
7.10 |
7.22 |
7.15 |
2009-10 |
3,80,000 |
3.57 |
3.99 |
4.37 |
2010-11 (up to Jan. 12, 2011) |
2,27,000 |
5.90 |
6.18 |
6.30 |
Apr-10 |
36,000 |
4.14 |
4.64 |
5.07 |
May-10 |
36,000 |
4.39 |
4.76 |
4.92 |
Jun-10 |
12,000 |
5.29 |
5.31 |
5.49 |
Jul-10 |
16,000 |
5.56 |
5.86 |
5.99 |
Aug-10 |
33,000 |
6.15 |
6.41 |
6.48 |
Sep-10 |
13,000 |
6.14 |
6.46 |
6.59 |
Oct-10 |
27,500 |
6.65 |
6.94 |
6.97 |
Nov-10 |
24,000 |
6.82 |
7.20 |
7.14 |
Dec-10 |
19,000 |
7.14 |
7.32 |
7.37 |
G-Sec yield curve shift reflects expectation
of policy rate changes in an inflationary
environment
V.8 The prevalence of tight liquidity
conditions and expectations of further hike in
the Reserve Bank’s policy rates were reflected
in an upward movement in primary as well as
secondary yields for short and medium-term GSecs
during the third quarter. Though long-term
yields remained range-bound, the short-term
and medium-term yields eased temporarily in
November, reflecting improvement in liquidity
conditions due to reduction in Government cash
balances and OMO purchases of G-Sec by the
Reserve Bank. In January 2011, the short-term
as well as long-term yields have again hardened
on inflation concerns (Chart V.3a). The average daily turnover of G-Sec in the secondary market
declined during the third quarter of 2010-11.
V.9 The spreads on five-year corporate bonds
over the corresponding government bond yield
hovered in a narrow range of 73-85 basis points
during October-November 2010, but increased
during the second half of December 2010, partly
reflecting the deficit liquidity conditions (Chart
V.3b).
V.10 Taking into account the need for fiscal
consolidation and the strong buoyancy in tax
and non-tax revenue (particularly receipts under
3G spectrum auctions), the indicative calendar
for the issuance of dated securities during the
second half of 2010-11 was scaled down by `
10,000 crore. Nearly 89 per cent of the GOI’s
gross market borrowing programme for 2010-
11 was completed during the year (up to January
19, 2011). Both the average maturity of debt
issuances and weighted average yield increased
during 2010-11 (up to January 19, 2011), as
compared with the corresponding period of the
previous year (Table V.6). Despite hardening of
yields, investors’ sentiment remained positive,
as evident from the bid-cover ratio of the
auctions that stood in the range of 1.4-3.9 during
2010-11 so far and 1.7-3.1 during the third
quarter. As the yield curve flattened at the longer
end, more long dated securities were issued
during the second half so far, taking advantage
of the yield curve movements.
 |
Table V.6 : Issuances of Central and State Government Dated Securities |
(` Crore) |
Item |
2009-10 |
2009-10* |
2010-11* |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Central Government |
|
|
|
Gross amount raised (` crore) |
4,18,000 |
4,03,000 |
4,06,000 |
Devolvement on Primary Dealers (` crore) |
7,219 |
7,219 |
5,773 |
Bid-cover ratio (Range) |
1.4-4.3 |
1.4-4.3 |
1.4-3.9 |
Weighted average maturity (years) |
11.20 |
11.15 |
11.56 |
Weighted average yield (per cent) |
7.23 |
7.39 |
7.94 |
State Governments |
|
|
|
Gross amount raised (` crore) |
1,31,122 |
1,00,085 |
82,464 |
Cut-off yield (Per cent) |
7.04-8.68 |
7.04-8.49 |
8.1-8.6 |
Weighted average yield (per cent) |
8.11 |
8.03 |
8.37 |
* : Up to January 19, 2011. |
V.11 As regards State Government market
borrowings, about 50 per cent of the gross
allocations for the States for 2010-11 were raised
by 22 States up to January 19, 2011 as compared
with nearly 90 per cent of the gross borrowings
raised during the comparable period of 2009-
10. Taking into account the comfortable cash
balances of the State Governments coupled with
buoyant National Savings Scheme Fund (NSSF)
flows there may be a moderation in their
borrowings for 2010-11. Weighted average
yields on market borrowings went up by 34
basis points so far during 2010-11.
The credit market exhibits strengthening
of monetary policy transmission
V.12 The scheduled commercial banks (SCBs)
raised the deposit rates to step up their deposit
mobilisation to support the high credit growth (Table V.7). Several banks revised their base
rates upwards in the range of 25-100 basis points
during July-January 17, 2011. Forty SCBs also
increased their BPLR in the range of 50-150
bps during July-January 17, 2010.
Table V.7: Deposit and Lending Rates of Banks |
(Per cent) |
|
Dec-09 |
Mar-10 |
Jun-10 |
Sep-10 |
Jan-11@ |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
1. |
Domestic Deposit Rate (1-3 years tenor) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Sector Banks |
6.00-7.25 |
6.00-7.25 |
6.00-7.25 |
6.75-7.75 |
7.00-9.25 |
|
Private Sector Banks |
5.25-7.50 |
5.25-7.75 |
6.25-7.50 |
6.50-8.25 |
7.75-9.00 |
|
Foreign Banks |
2.25-7.75 |
2.25-8.00 |
3.00-8.00 |
3.00-8.00 |
3.50-8.75 |
2. |
BPLR/Base Rate# |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Public Sector Banks |
11.00-13.50 |
11.00-13.50 |
11.00-13.50 |
7.50-8.25 |
8.00-9.00 |
|
2. Private Sector Banks |
12.50-16.75 |
12.50-16.75 |
12.50-16.75 |
7.00-8.75 |
7.75-9.50 |
|
3. Foreign Banks |
10.50-16.00 |
10.50-16.00 |
10.50-16.00 |
5.50-9.00 |
6.25-9.00 |
3. |
Actual Lending Rate* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Public Sector Banks |
3.25-18.00 |
3.25-18.00 |
3.25-18.00 |
3.50-25.00 |
- |
|
2. Private Sector Banks |
3.50-25.84 |
3.00-28.00 |
2.80-26.00 |
4.00-27.00 |
- |
|
3. Foreign Banks |
3.50-22.00 |
3.60-23.00 |
3.60-25.00 |
2.25-35.98 |
- |
* : Interest rate on non-export demand and term loans above ` 2 lakh excluding lending rates at the extreme five per
cent on both sides.
# : With effect from July 1, 2010, the BPLR system was replaced with the Base Rate system.
@: As on January 17, 2011. |
The forex market remains orderly, despite
larger capital inflows
V.13 The Indian rupee exhibited a two-way
movement against major international
currencies with minimal intervention or capital
account management during the third quarter
of 2010-11(Chart V.4a). With the sharp
appreciation of the rupee during October 2010,
forward premia firmed up across maturities,
reflecting the increased demand for forward
cover. Forward premia eased subsequently, but
remained higher than in the first two quarters
of 2010-11. The turnover in both inter-bank and merchant segments of the forex market
increased in October 2010 but declined
thereafter (Chart V.4b).
 |
V.14 The offshore market for Indian Rupee
grew in size in the past five years reflecting the
increasing globalisation of the economy, and the
need for non-residents to hedge the rupee risk
in their portfolio. The preliminary triennial
central bank survey results published by the
Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in
April 2010 shows that more than half of the
average daily turnover in forex derivatives on
Indian Rupees took place offshore. Trading
volumes in currency futures, which had spiked
in September 2010, with the commencement of
operations by the United Stock Exchange of
India (USEI), declined thereafter up to
December 2010. The volumes recovered in
January 2011, so far.
Table V.8 : Key Stock Market Indicators |
Indicator |
BSE |
NSE |
2009-10 |
2009-10
(Apr- Dec) |
2010-11
(Apr- Dec) |
2009-10 |
2009-10
(Apr-Dec) |
2010-11
(Apr-Dec) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1. |
BSE Sensex/S&PCNX Nifty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) End-period |
17528 |
17465 |
20509 |
5249 |
5201 |
6135 |
|
(ii) Average |
15585 |
15151 |
18610 |
4658 |
4527 |
5587 |
2. |
Coefficient of Variation |
11.88 |
12.6 |
6.96 |
11.33 |
11.9 |
7.04 |
3. |
Price-Earning Ratio (end-period)* |
21.32 |
22.36 |
23.56 |
22.33 |
23.17 |
24.48 |
4. |
Price-Book Value Ratio |
3.90 |
4.20 |
3.84 |
3.70 |
3.65 |
3.87 |
5. |
Market Capitalisation to GDP Ratio (per cent)@ |
98.9 |
97.6 |
101.9 |
96.4 |
91.5 |
103.0 |
* : Based on 30 scrips included in the BSE Sensex and 50 scrips included in the S&P CNX Nifty.
@ : As at end-period.
Source: Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE) and National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE). |
Volatile equity markets reflect largely the
impact of volatile portfolio flows
V.15 The Indian equity markets remained
volatile, in line with the global trend during the
third quarter of 2010-11. Strong domestic
fundamentals helped in attracting FII flows in
equities, even though mutual funds turned net
sellers. However, as concerns relating to
Ireland’s debt rating resurfaced in November
2010, the volume of FII support to the equity
markets declined considerably since the last
week of the month. The market regained some
strength by the end of the third quarter, in view
of strong growth prospects of the Indian
economy and expectations of encouraging
corporate results (Table V.8). As compared to
the rise in the benchmark BSE Sensex by 2.2
per cent during the third quarter, the banking
and reality indices declined by 4.6 per cent and 23.4 per cent, respectively, in view of the
concerns relating to the banks’ financing of the
reality sector (Chart V.5a). In the recent period,
particularly from the beginning January 2011,
equity markets have witnessed some correction
in anticipation of policy response to high
inflation. FIIs turned net sellers in 2011 (up to
January 19).
V.16 The activity in the primary segment of the
domestic capital market continued to display
signs of buoyancy during October-November
2010. Resources raised through public issues
increased considerably during April-December
2010 as compared to the corresponding period
last year (Table V.9). There was a net outflow
of resources mobilised by mutual funds during
April-December 2010 as compared to an inflow
during the corresponding period of the previous
year due to tight liquidity conditions exerting pressure on redemptions. Mobilisation of
resources through private placement increased
by 2.7 per cent during April-September 2010
largely on account of debt issuances by the
financial companies.
V.17 The FIIs were net buyers and mutual
funds turned net sellers during April-
December 2010 and this trend reversed in
January 2011 (up to January 11) (Chart V.5a).
Net FII investment in Indian equities
increased strongly during the first two months
of the third quarter, while investment in debt
remained subdued. FII investments, however,
witnessed some slowdown in December 2010,
mainly on account of year-end redemption
pressures which resulted in a moderation of
turnover in both cash and derivative segments
(Chart V.5b).
Table V.9 : Resource Mobilisation from Capital Market |
(` crore) |
Category |
2009-10 (Apr-Mar) |
2009-10 (Apr-Dec) |
2010-11 (Apr- Dec) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
A. Prospectus and Rights Issues* |
32,607 |
20,104 |
27,697 |
1. Private Sector (a+b) |
25,479 |
13,301 |
18,799 |
a) Financial |
326 |
313 |
3,420 |
b) Non-financial |
25,153 |
12,988 |
15,379 |
2. Public Sector |
7,128 |
6,803 |
9,079 |
B. Euro Issues |
15,967 |
15,164 |
8,491 |
C. Mutual Fund Mobilisation(net)@ |
83,080 |
1,41,639 |
-32,164 |
1. Private Sector |
54,928 |
1,08,170 |
-8,949 |
2. Public Sector # |
28,152 |
33,469 |
-23,214 |
* : Excluding offer for sale. @ : Net of redemptions. # : Including UTI Mutual fund.
Source: Mutual Fund data are sourced from SEBI and exclude funds mobilised under Fund of Funds Schemes. |
Rise in property prices continues
V.18 Property prices continued to rise in most
cities during the second quarter of 2010-11, as
reflected in the quarterly House Price Index
(HPI) based on data collected from the
Department of Registration and Stamps (DRS).
However, property prices in Delhi and Chennai
recorded some moderation (Chart V.6).
In November 2010, with a view to preventing
excessive leveraging, the Reserve Bank
had tightened the prudential norms for housing
credit.
While orderly financial markets would
support the growth momentum, liquidity
conditions would reflect the antiinflationary
stance
V.19 During the third quarter of 2010-11, the
interest rates in most segments of financial
markets shot up, mainly reflecting the deficit
liquidity conditions. Going forward, the recent
substantial easing of liquidity conditions on
account of policy actions initiated by the
Reserve Bank and reduction in the unusually
high Government balances may reduce the pressure on the rates. The expected continuation
of the robust growth momentum suggests that
demand for financing economic activities would
increase, which have to be met by banks and
markets in a more competitive environment.
Banks would have to respond to the structural
mismatch between deposit and credit growth
through appropriate rate adjustments. The risk
of volatile portfolio flows impacting asset prices
and exchange rate could be expected to persist,
while maintaining orderly conditions in various
segments of the financial markets would
continue to be a policy priority.
|