The domestic demand* led growth process continued and was characterised by stronger growth
in private consumption expenditure and higher contribution of fixed capital formation to growth.
Reflecting fiscal consolidation and slowdown in government expenditure in recent few months,
contribution of government consumption expenditure to growth moderated. Corporate sales
growth remained high while earnings improved, suggesting buoyancy in demand. As the external
sector outlook broadly suggests widening of current account deficit, the contribution of net
exports to growth could remain negligible.
Private consumption expenditure and
government capital expenditure have been
the major growth drivers in the first half
of the year
II.1 During the first half of 2010-11, the
growth impulse from the expenditure side of
GDP emanated predominantly from the
acceleration in private consumption expenditure
and gross fixed capital formation (Table II.1 and Chart II.1). Private final consumption
expenditure gathered pace reflecting partly the
pick-up in agricultural growth. Gross fixed
capital formation also showed higher growth
supported by robust corporate sector
performance and strong growth in capital
expenditure by the Government. Overall, real
GDP at market prices increased by 10.4 per cent
during the first half of 2010-11, which was higher than the growth of 8.9 per cent in real
GDP at factor cost. The differential in growth
rates reflected higher net indirect taxes accruing
to the government from stronger overall and
industrial sector growth in the year.
Furthermore, with substantial revision in
expenditure side data for the first quarter of
2010-11, the trends in gross fixed capital
formation and capital goods segment in IIP are
now better aligned for the first half of the current
fiscal.
Table II.1 : Expenditure Side of GDP (2004-05 Prices) |
(Per cent) |
|
2008-09 @ |
2009- 10 # |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
H1 |
H1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|
Growth Rate |
Real GDP at market prices |
5.1 |
7.7 |
5.6 |
6.6 |
7.3 |
11.2 |
10.3 |
10.6 |
6.1 |
10.4 |
Total final consumption expenditure |
8.3 |
5.3 |
5.9 |
9.8 |
4.8 |
2.6 |
8.0 |
9.3 |
7.8 |
8.7 |
(i) Private |
6.8 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
6.7 |
5.3 |
2.6 |
7.8 |
9.3 |
5.5 |
8.6 |
(ii) Government |
16.7 |
10.5 |
15.4 |
30.2 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
9.0 |
9.2 |
22.4 |
9.1 |
Gross fixed capital formation |
4.0 |
7.2 |
3.1 |
4.0 |
8.8 |
17.7 |
19.0 |
11.1 |
3.6 |
14.9 |
Changes in stocks |
-61.2 |
5.9 |
-0.8 |
3.5 |
8.7 |
11.1 |
15.3 |
12.4 |
1.4 |
13.8 |
Net Exports |
40.2 |
-9.7 |
13.2 |
-7.6 |
-0.3 |
-113.4 |
12.2 |
-2.9 |
0.1 |
3.4 |
|
Relative Share |
Total final consumption expenditure |
70.9 |
69.4 |
73.1 |
72.6 |
73.4 |
62.3 |
71.6 |
71.7 |
72.8 |
71.6 |
(i) Private |
59.5 |
57.6 |
61.6 |
61.3 |
60.4 |
51.1 |
60.3 |
60.6 |
61.4 |
60.4 |
(ii) Government |
11.5 |
11.8 |
11.4 |
11.3 |
13.1 |
11.2 |
11.3 |
11.2 |
11.4 |
11.2 |
Gross fixed capital formation |
32.9 |
32.8 |
32.4 |
34.3 |
31.9 |
34.6 |
35.0 |
34.4 |
33.4 |
34.7 |
Changes in stocks |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
Net Exports |
-6.1 |
-5.1 |
-5.7 |
-7.8 |
-6.7 |
0.4 |
-5.8 |
-6.8 |
-6.7 |
-6.3 |
Memo: |
` Crore |
Real GDP at Market Prices |
44,65,360 |
48,07,222 |
10,85,993 |
11,08,537 |
12,42,858 |
13,39,454 |
11,97,587 |
12,25,554 |
21,94,530 |
24,23,141 |
@ : Quick Estimates # : Revised Estimates.
Note: As only major items are included in the table, data will not add up to 100.
Source: Central Statistics Office. |
 |
Contribution of government final
consumption expenditure and net exports to
overall growth reflects fiscal consolidation
and widening current account deficit
II.2 Government final consumption
expenditure continued to grow at a robust pace
but showed noticeable slackening relative to
higher growth of last year, reflecting the impact
of the resumption of the fiscal consolidation
process (Table II.1).
II.3 The contribution of net exports fell for
the second successive quarter, though it
still remained positive, even as the deficit in
the goods and services account persisted
(Chart II.2).
The composition of government expenditure
has shifted towards capital expenditure
II.4 The Centre had budgeted a sharp
reduction in expenditure growth for 2010-11 as a part of its gradual exit from the crisis-driven
expansionary fiscal policy stance. However, the
progress during 2010-11 (April-November)
indicates a higher than budgeted growth in
expenditure. The capital component of
expenditure exhibited strong growth, which
needs to be continued to address the growing
infrastructure gap. Total expenditure growth,
however, was substantially lower than the
growth recorded during the corresponding
period of 2009-10, as the Government lowered
its expenditure since August 2010. The
government intends to boost its expenditure in
priority sectors, given the fiscal space available
on account of higher than budgeted revenue
receipts, which potentially could exert demand
pressures.
II.5 The higher than budgeted revenue receipts
during 2010-11 (April-November) resulted from better than expected tax and non-tax collections.
Apart from substantial non-tax revenues in the
form of receipts through the 3G and broadband
wireless access (BWA) spectrum auctions, gross
tax revenue increased strongly (26.8 per cent)
as against a decline (7.8 per cent) in 2009-10
(April-November). There have been significant
increases in revenues from customs duty (64.2
per cent) and union excise duty (37.3 per cent)
along with high growth in personal income tax
collections (11.8 per cent) and corporate tax
collections (19.9 per cent), reflecting mainly the
buoyancy in domestic economic activity and
international trade as well as the partial rollback
of indirect tax rate reductions as part of the fiscal
exit.
 |
II.6 The Government is on track in anchoring
its fiscal deficit to 5.5 per cent of GDP in 2010-
11. The mid-year targets for its key fiscal
indicators were met for the first time since the
enactment of Fiscal Responsibility and Budget
Management (FRBM) Rules, 2004, benefiting
from strong buoyancy in its revenue receipts.
The progress in Central Government finances
during 2010-11 (April-November) shows a
lower growth in expenditure as compared to
2009-10, along with strong growth observed in tax and non-tax revenues. Consequently,
revenue deficit (RD) and gross fiscal deficit
(GFD) during 2010-11 (April-November) were
substantially lower in absolute terms and as
proportions of budget estimates, than those
during the corresponding period of the previous
year (Table II.2).
Higher development expenditure necessary
for inclusive growth
II.7 Sector-wise profile of Government
expenditure shows higher than budgeted
growth in expenditure during 2010-11 (April-
November) in agriculture, rural development,
education and health, reflecting the
Government’s commitment to inclusive and
sustainable growth. The higher resource
availability from excess revenues has created
fiscal space for allocating higher outlays to
these priority sectors, which was reflected in
the Government’s additional supplementary
demand for grants. Since lower inflation is a
key factor to promote inclusive growth, the
higher demand resulting from social
expenditure also suggests the need to step up
the rate of growth of essential items on the
supply side.
Table II.2 : Central Government Finances : April-November |
Items |
Amount (` crore) |
Percentages to Budget Estimates for |
Growth Rate
(Per cent) |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1. Revenue Receipts |
3,07,125 |
4,76,716 |
50.0 |
69.9 |
-2.5 |
55.2 |
i) Tax Revenue (Net) |
2,32,873 |
2,96,634 |
49.1 |
55.5 |
-8.2 |
27.4 |
ii) Non-tax Revenue |
74,252 |
1,80,082 |
52.9 |
121.6 |
20.9 |
142.5 |
2. Non-Debt Capital Receipts |
8,326 |
27,449 |
155.8 |
60.8 |
215.4 |
229.7 |
3. Non-Plan Expenditure |
4,47,995 |
4,79,771 |
64.4 |
65.2 |
25.1 |
7.1 |
of which: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
i) Interest Payments |
1,19,504 |
1,34,544 |
53.0 |
54.1 |
7.0 |
12.6 |
ii) Defence |
78,955 |
86,404 |
55.7 |
58.6 |
50.2 |
9.4 |
iii) Major Subsidies |
90,766 |
90,137 |
85.6 |
82.6 |
-8.1 |
-0.7 |
4. Plan Expenditure |
1,73,677 |
2,10,916 |
53.4 |
56.5 |
27.6 |
21.4 |
5. Revenue Expenditure |
5,65,027 |
6,16,874 |
63.0 |
64.3 |
23.8 |
9.2 |
6. Capital Expenditure |
56,645 |
73,813 |
45.8 |
49.2 |
49.9 |
30.3 |
7. Total Expenditure |
6,21,672 |
6,90,687 |
60.9 |
62.3 |
25.8 |
11.1 |
8. Revenue Deficit |
2,57,902 |
1,40,158 |
91.2 |
50.7 |
82.4 |
-45.7 |
9. Gross Fiscal Deficit |
3,06,221 |
1,86,522 |
76.4 |
48.9 |
73.5 |
-39.1 |
10. Gross Primary Deficit |
1,86,717 |
51,978 |
106.4 |
39.2 |
188.0 |
-72.2 |
Source : Controller General of Accounts, Ministry of Finance. |
Risks to fiscal consolidation over the medium
term and quality of fiscal consolidation are
important concerns
II.8 Although Central Government finances
are in line with the Medium Term Fiscal Policy
Statement (MTFPS) roadmap, in order to meet
the Thirteenth Finance Commission (TFC)
target for RD and GFD (zero per cent and 3.0
per cent of GDP, respectively), steeper
corrections would be necessary by 2013-14.
The Government recognises that the envisaged
elimination of RD by 2013-14 would be
difficult. Furthermore, an abiding mediumterm
objective is to use borrowings for
financing capital expenditure as indicated by
the Government in its Mid-Year Analysis,
2010-11. As per the economic and functional
classification, expenditure of Central
Government administration and departmental
commercial undertakings in gross capital
formation was budgeted to remain low (1.0 per
cent of GDP) during 2010-11. Moreover, there
is a likelihood of further increase in subsidies,
in view of the rising international oil and
fertiliser prices. Finally, global uncertainty,
especially in Europe, continues to be a key
downside risk to fiscal consolidation.
II.9 The emphasis in the current phase of
consolidation should be on the quality of
adjustment, while also building adequate fiscal
space to deal with future adverse shocks to
growth and inflation. The fiscal correction
envisaged during 2010-11 seems to rely
significantly on one-off items (such as receipts
from telecom spectrum auction and
disinvestment proceeds). Furthermore,
substantial proportion of the budgeted fiscal
correction in 2010-11 is to be realised from the
savings on account of lower than expected
expenditure in respect of pay and pension
arrears and loan waiver scheme. Durable fiscal
consolidation, however, would require measures
to augment revenue collection on a sustainable
basis and rationalisation of recurring
expenditure, with a focus on curtailing non-plan
revenue expenditure.
Combined fiscal gap likely to moderate as state
government finances show improvement
II.10 After witnessing deterioration in the
previous two years, consolidated revenue
deficit and gross fiscal deficit of State
governments are estimated to fall in 2010-11
(BE) (Table II.3). The correction in the revenue
account in 2010-11 is expected to come through increase in revenue receipts as well
as compression in revenue expenditure (as ratio
to GDP) and thus appears to be more balanced.
Lower consolidated revenue deficit of State
governments along with lower capital outlay
as ratio to GDP is likely to result in lower GFDGDP
ratio.
Table II.3 : Key Fiscal Indicators |
(Per cent to GDP) |
Year |
Primary Deficit |
Revenue Deficit |
Gross Fiscal Deficit |
Outstanding Liabilities* |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Centre |
2008-09 |
2.6 |
4.5 |
6.0 |
59.2 |
2009-10 RE |
3.2 |
5.3 |
6.7 |
58.2 |
2010-11 BE |
1.9 |
4.0 |
5.5 |
57.8 |
States # |
2008-09 |
0.6 |
-0.2 |
2.4 |
26.2 |
2009-10 RE |
1.6 |
0.8 |
3.4 |
26.2 |
2010-11 BE |
1.0 |
0.4 |
2.9 |
25.8 |
Combined |
2008-09 |
3.4 |
4.3 |
8.5 |
74.5 |
2009-10 RE |
4.8 |
6.0 |
10.0 |
74.3 |
2010-11 BE |
3.0 |
4.4 |
8.3 |
74.3 |
RE : Revised Estimates. BE : Budget Estimates.
* : Includes external liabilities at current exchange rates based on the report, Government Debt Status and Road Ahead, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, November 2010.
# : Data pertain to 27 State governments.
Note : Negative sign indicates surplus. |
II.11 Combined finances of the Central and
State governments budgeted for 2010-11
indicate that the key deficit indicators as per
cent of GDP would moderate compared to the
elevated levels of 2009-10 (Table II.3).
Corporate sales growth remained high
suggesting buoyancy in demand
II.12 The private corporate sector contributed
to the robust economic activity, and in turn,
benefited from strong sales growth during the
second quarter of 2010-11 (Table II.4).
However, the build-up in inventory
accumulation relative to sales moderated
during the second quarter of 2010-11 compared
to the recent peak observed during the first
quarter of the financial year (Chart II.3).
Compared to moderate growth in PAT of the
private corporate sector, Government nonfinancial
companies witnessed a noticeable rise
driven by the robust performance of oil
companies.
II.13 Strong investment intentions, as reflected
in higher envisaged capital expenditure
of companies which approached banks/FIs
for financial assistance during April-September
2010, indicate optimistic outlook for
fixed capital formation. In the first half of 2010-
11, 338 projects were sanctioned assistance by
banks/FIs involving about ` 2,42,000 crore as
against 251 projects worth ` 2,31,000 crore
during the corresponding period of the previous
year.
Sectoral imbalances require structural policies
II.14 The rebound in private consumption
partly reflected the low base effect, and hence,
does not signal any broad based demand side
pressure as yet. Sectoral demand-supply
imbalances require structural policy
intervention to improve the supply situation more than any demand compressing measures
at the aggregate level. The stronger growth in
private consumption expenditure partly reflects
the change in terms-of-trade in favour of
agriculture in view of the supply side constraints
and the Government’s commitment towards its
flagship programmes, such as MGNREGA.
With the waning of the base effect, the recent
momentum in sales growth of corporates,
however, would be contingent, inter alia, on the
sustained growth in final consumption
expenditure. Fiscal consolidation ushered in by the Government is expected to further lower the
relative contribution of government final
consumption expenditure to growth even though
the share of government fixed capital formation
may increase. Fiscal consolidation, if sustained,
can contribute to a low inflation regime to
coexist with high growth. In the near-term,
India’s policy option could be to pursue further
diversification of exports in the fast growing
emerging market economies to increase the
contribution of the external sector to overall
economic growth.
Table II.4 : Private Corporate Sector- Financial Performance |
(Growth rates/Ratios in per cent) |
Item |
2008-09 |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
No. of Companies |
2500 |
2386 |
2486 |
2561 |
2530 |
2531 |
2562 |
2565 |
2546 |
2586 |
Sales |
29.3 |
31.8 |
9.5 |
1.9 |
-0.9 |
0.1 |
22.5 |
29.1 |
24.2 |
18.7 |
Other Income* |
-8.4 |
-0.6 |
-4.8 |
39.4 |
50.2 |
6.0 |
7.4 |
10.3 |
-21.2 |
58.5 |
Expenditure |
33.5 |
37.5 |
12.6 |
-0.5 |
-4.4 |
-2.5 |
20.6 |
30.7 |
29.0 |
19.9 |
Depreciation provision |
15.3 |
16.5 |
16.8 |
19.6 |
21.5 |
20.7 |
21.6 |
20.1 |
19.9 |
16.8 |
Gross profits (PBIT) |
11.9 |
8.7 |
-26.7 |
-8.8 |
5.8 |
10.9 |
60.0 |
36.7 |
8.2 |
10.3 |
Interest payments |
58.1 |
85.3 |
62.9 |
36.5 |
3.7 |
-1.0 |
-12.3 |
-2.9 |
26.9 |
5.9 |
Profits after tax |
6.9 |
-2.6 |
-53.4 |
-19.9 |
5.5 |
12.0 |
99.3 |
44.0 |
2.4 |
10.8 |
|
Select Ratios |
Change in stock-in-trade to Sales# |
2.9 |
2.2 |
-1.7 |
-1.8 |
0.6 |
2.3 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
2.9 |
1.0 |
Gross Profits to Sales |
14.5 |
13.5 |
11.0 |
13.7 |
15.7 |
14.9 |
14.3 |
14.6 |
13.9 |
13.6 |
Profits After Tax to Sales |
9.7 |
8.6 |
5.3 |
8.1 |
10.2 |
9.4 |
8.8 |
9.0 |
8.6 |
8.5 |
Interest to Sales |
2.4 |
2.9 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
2.8 |
3.1 |
2.7 |
2.4 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
Interest to Gross Profits |
16.8 |
21.5 |
34.6 |
23.3 |
18.0 |
20.5 |
19.1 |
16.6 |
21.1 |
19.9 |
Interest Coverage (Times) |
6.0 |
4.6 |
2.9 |
4.3 |
5.6 |
4.9 |
5.2 |
6.0 |
4.7 |
5.0 |
#: For companies reporting this item explicitly.
*: Other income excludes extraordinary income/expenditure if reported explicitly
Note : Growth rates are percentage changes in the level for the period under reference over the corresponding period of the previous year for common set of companies. |
 |
* Demand as measured by expenditure side GDP data |