Drivers of aggregate demand changed significantly in the fourth quarter of 2009-10, suggesting increasing self-sustaining nature of the recovery process. The recovery in investment demand exhibited acceleration, which seems to have been sustained in 2010-11 so far, going by the trends in capital goods production. Private consumption demand remained subdued, though lead indicators suggest pick-up in recent months. Contribution of government consumption demand has moderated considerably and reflecting the fiscal consolidation process, the support from government spending is expected to moderate further. The positive contribution of net exports that resulted from sharper decline in imports in relation to exports during 2009-10 will revert to the normal pattern in 2010-11 as domestic demand picks up. The overall growth outlook, thus, would be largely conditioned by the strength of private consumption and investment demand in 2010-11.
Domestic Demand
II.1 Private consumption and investment demand had turned anaemic in the wake of the global crisis, which necessitated demand stimulating monetary and fiscal measures. Self-sustaining drivers of growth from the demand side, particularly private investment demand, exhibited a turnaround in the second half of 2009-10, which also facilitated the beginning of policy exit. With continuation of the recovery in private investment demand and stronger pick-up in private consumption demand, normalisation of monetary policy and fiscal consolidation would create the macro-economic environment that would be conducive for
sustainable high growth.
II.2 The evolving trends in aggregate demand provide useful insights into the major drivers of growth momentum and their sustainability over the medium-term. The growth in private consumption demand witnessed deceleration from 6.8 per cent in 2008-09 to 4.3 percent in 2009-10, reflecting the dampening impact of overall economic slowdown on the one hand and weak agriculture production and high food prices on the other. The slowdown in private consumption demand was particularly sharp during the fourth quarter of 2009-10 (Table II.1 and Chart II.1).
II.3 The government final consumption expenditure, which had emerged as the dominant driver of growth in the third quarter of 2008-09, witnessed significant moderation starting from the third quarter of 2009-10. The slowdown in government consumption expenditure continued through the fourth quarter of 2009-10, reflecting the high base in the second half of the previous year owing to the crisis induced fiscal stimulus. The sluggish growth in both private and government consumption demand has led to moderation in their respective contributions to growth in aggregate demand during the fourth
quarter of 2009-10 (Chart II.2).
Table II.1: Expenditure Side of GDP (At 2004-05 Prices) |
(Per cent) |
Item |
2008-09* |
2009-10# |
2008-09 |
2009-10 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
Growth Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP at market prices |
5.1 |
7.7 |
7.3 |
6.9 |
3.0 |
3.8 |
5.2 |
6.4 |
7.3 |
11.2 |
Total Consumption Expenditure |
8.3 |
5.3 |
7.7 |
7.6 |
13.2 |
4.6 |
4.7 |
9.6 |
4.8 |
2.6 |
(i) Private |
6.8 |
4.3 |
8.4 |
7.6 |
6.4 |
5.1 |
2.9 |
6.4 |
5.3 |
2.6 |
(ii) Government |
16.7 |
10.5 |
3.7 |
7.5 |
59.0 |
2.5 |
15.3 |
30.5 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
Gross Fixed Capital Formation |
4.0 |
7.2 |
6.5 |
7.3 |
-0.1 |
2.7 |
-0.7 |
1.6 |
8.8 |
17.7 |
Change in Stocks |
-61.2 |
5.9 |
-60.2 |
-60.3 |
-61.9 |
-62.2 |
-0.9 |
4.2 |
8.7 |
11.1 |
Net Exports |
40.2 |
-9.7 |
31.1 |
101.0 |
77.7 |
-29.4 |
29.8 |
6.1 |
-0.3 |
-113.4 |
Relative Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumption Expenditure |
70.9 |
69.4 |
71.8 |
69.4 |
75.2 |
67.5 |
71.4 |
71.5 |
73.4 |
62.3 |
(i) Private |
59.5 |
57.6 |
61.3 |
60.1 |
61.5 |
55.4 |
59.9 |
60.1 |
60.4 |
51.1 |
(ii) Government |
11.5 |
11.8 |
10.5 |
9.2 |
13.7 |
12.2 |
11.5 |
11.3 |
13.1 |
11.2 |
Gross Fixed Capital Formation |
32.9 |
32.8 |
33.0 |
34.8 |
31.5 |
32.7 |
31.2 |
33.2 |
31.9 |
34.6 |
Change in Stocks |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
Net Exports |
-6.1 |
-5.1 |
-5.2 |
-8.8 |
-7.3 |
-3.5 |
-6.5 |
-8.7 |
-6.7 |
0.4 |
*: Quick Estimates. # : Revised Estimates. |
II.4 The y-o-y growth in gross fixed capital formation during the fourth quarter of 2009-10 at 17.7 per cent represented a significant acceleration. Consequently, the contribution of investment demand to growth improved substantially to 51.5 per cent during the fourth quarter of 2009-10 as
against 38.0 per cent in the preceding quarter.
The pick- up in investment demand was reflective of improved overall business and investment environment and intentions to add capacity to meet the expected pick-up in demand. In addition to the fixed investment activity, there were indications of rapid inventory build up during the third
and fourth quarters of 2009-10.
Demand Management through Fiscal Policy
Central Government Finances: 2009-10 and 2010-11
II.5 With a view to supporting the recovery momentum, fiscal policy continued its expansionary stance during 2009-10. Reflecting this, the revenue deficit (RD) and gross fiscal deficit (GFD) expanded over the previous year (RE) (Table II.2).
II.6 With gradual exit from the fiscal stimulus measures through the partial rollback of indirect tax cuts and compression in the growth of non-plan expenditure, the Central Government resumed the process of fiscal consolidation during 2010-11. With these measures, alongside the expected higher growth in GDP, RD and GFD are envisaged to be brought down during 2010-11(BE) over the preceding year.
Table II.2: Key Fiscal Indicators |
(Per cent to GDP) |
Year |
Primary Deficit |
Revenue Deficit |
Gross Fiscal Deficit |
Outstanding Liabilities |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| |
|
Centre |
|
|
2008-09 (Actual) |
2.6 |
4.5 |
6.0 |
56.7 |
2009-10 RE |
3.1 |
5.3 |
6.6 |
56.4 |
2010-11 BE |
1.9 |
4.0 |
5.5 |
56.9 |
| |
|
States* |
|
|
2008-09 (Actual) |
0.6 |
-0.2 |
2.4 |
26.2 |
2009-10 RE |
1.7 |
1.0 |
3.6 |
26.3 |
2010-11 BE |
1.2 |
0.6 |
3.0 |
– |
| |
|
Combined |
|
|
2008-09 (Actual) |
3.4 |
4.4 |
8.5 |
71.6 |
2009-10 RE |
4.9 |
6.2 |
10.1 |
72.4 |
2010-11 BE |
3.2 |
4.6 |
8.5 |
– |
RE : Revised Estimates. BE : Budget Estimates.
* : Based on Budget documents of 24 State Governments.
– : Not available.
Note: Minus sign against deficit parameters indicates surplus. |
II.7 The correction in deficit indicators has been envisaged in the Union Budget for 2010-11 to come through a combination of factors, viz., higher revenue receipts, greater disinvestment proceeds, and curtailment of growth in revenue expenditure, especially in the non-plan component (Table II.3). Revenue collections from 3G/BWA spectrum auctions have turned out to be Rs.1,06,262 crore, more than three times of the budgeted amount of Rs.35,000 crore in the Union Budget for 2010-11. As a result, the non-tax revenue receipts are expected to go up by 48 per cent from the budgeted level. This additional mobilisation of resources, unless utilised for expanding expenditure, would result in an additional 1.0 percentage point reduction in both RD and GFD, compared to what has been envisaged in the Budget estimates of 2010-11, and thereby create more space for private investment. The decision taken in June 2010 to deregulate petrol prices and revise the prices of other petroleum products upwards would also help in containing the pressure on the fiscal situation, besides contributing to medium-term fiscal sustainability. Some of the tax measures announced in the Union Budget for 2010-11, such as increase in income tax slabs and the indirect tax measures, viz., concessional customs duty, exemption of excise duty and service tax would have positive impact on the private consumption and investment demand. Direct tax collections during April-June 2010 have registered strong growth reflecting, inter-alia, the rebound in economic activity.
Table II.3: Central Government Finances |
Item |
Growth rate (per cent) |
Per cent to GDP |
2008-09 |
2009-10 (RE) |
2010-11 (BE) |
2008-09 |
2009-10 (RE) |
2010-11 (BE) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1. Total Expenditure |
24.0 |
15.6 |
8.5 |
15.9 |
16.4 |
16.0 |
2. Revenue Expenditure |
33.5 |
14.2 |
5.8 |
14.2 |
14.5 |
13.8 |
3. Capital Expenditure |
-23.7* |
27.8 |
30.2 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
2.2 |
4. Non-Plan Expenditure |
19.9 |
16.0 |
4.1 |
10.9 |
11.3 |
10.6 |
5. Plan Expenditure |
34.2 |
14.5 |
18.4 |
4.9 |
5.1 |
5.4 |
6 .Revenue Receipts |
-0.3 |
6.9 |
18.2 |
9.7 |
9.3 |
9.8 |
i) Tax Revenue (net) |
0.9 |
4.9 |
14.8 |
8.0 |
7.5 |
7.7 |
ii) Non Tax Revenue |
-5.3 |
15.7 |
32.0 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
2.1 |
RE : Revised Estimates. BE : Budget Estimates.
* : The sharp decline essentially reflects the higher base of the previous year (2007-08), on account of acquisition of the RBI’s stake in the State Bank of India by the Government of India. |
State Finances
II.8 With a view to encouraging the State governments to undertake additional capital investments and boost domestic aggregate demand, States were allowed additional market borrowing to the extent of 0.5 per cent of their GSDP in 2008-09 and further 0.5 per cent in 2009-10. Consequently, there
was significant increase in aggregate spending of the State governments in
2009-10 (RE), resulting in higher deficit. In
terms of the budget documents for 2010-11,
the State governments have resumed the
process of fiscal consolidation.1 Correction
in deficit indicators is expected to be
achieved mainly through significant
moderation in the growth of revenue
expenditure from 25.2 per cent in 2009-10
(RE) to 9.6 per cent in 2010-11 (BE), while
the deceleration in the growth of capital
outlay from 11.4 per cent to 3.8 per cent
during the same period is also expected to
aid the process. This would be supplemented
by 16.6 per cent growth in own tax revenues
and 19.9 per cent growth in States’ share in
central taxes in 2010-11 (BE). As a result,
States’ revenue deficit and gross fiscal deficit
are budgeted to be lower in 2010-11 (BE).
Combined Fiscal Position
II.9 Reflecting the continued expansionary fiscal stance of both the
Central and State Governments, the
combined RD increased to 6.2 per cent, while GFD rose to 10.1 per cent of GDP
during 2009-10. The combined finances are
likely to improve considerably during
2010-11, on account of the envisaged path
of fiscal consolidation by both the Centre
and the States (Table II.4).
Table II.4: Combined Finances |
Item |
Growth rate (per cent) |
Per cent to GDP |
2008-09 |
2009-10 (RE) |
2010-11 (BE) |
2008-09 |
2009-10 (RE) |
2010-11 (BE) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
1. |
Total expenditure |
20.4 |
19.6 |
8.4 |
28.4 |
30.4 |
29.6 |
2. |
Revenue Expenditure |
25.7 |
20.0 |
7.4 |
24.2 |
25.9 |
25.0 |
3. |
Capital Expenditure |
-3.0 |
17.4 |
13.9 |
4.3 |
4.5 |
4.6 |
4. |
Non-Developmental Expenditure |
7.1 |
22.5 |
11.2 |
11.3 |
12.4 |
12.4 |
5. |
Development expenditure |
31.5 |
17.8 |
6.1 |
16.8 |
17.7 |
16.8 |
6. |
Revenue Receipts |
3.9 |
11.4 |
15.6 |
19.8 |
19.7 |
20.5 |
| |
i) Tax Revenue |
5.2 |
7.5 |
16.3 |
16.6 |
15.9 |
16.7 |
| |
ii) Non Tax Revenue |
-2.6 |
31.1 |
12.3 |
3.2 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
RE : Revised Estimate. BE : Budget Estimate.
Note: The data pertains to the Central Government and 24 State Governments. |
Corporate Performance
II.10 The pick-up in overall economic
activity was evident from the corporate
sales data as well. During the fourth quarter
of 2009-10, the year-on-year sales growth
of select non-financial non-government
listed companies was around 29 per cent,
which turned out to be the highest in last
six quarters (Table II.5). Net profits also
increased by 44 per cent as against a sharp
decline during the corresponding period of
the preceding year. The increase largely
emanated from manufacturing companies.
The improved revenue realisation reflects
besides a low base, strong recovery in
economic activity and rising commodity
prices. The profit margins also continued
to be supported by rise in other income and the decline in interest outgo. During the
fourth quarter of 2009-10, both sales and
inventory demand have gone up,
suggesting acceleration in industrial
activity (Chart II.3).
Table II.5: Performance of Non-Government Non-Financial Listed Companies |
(Growth rate/ratios in per cent) |
Item |
2008-09 |
2009-10 |
2008-09 |
2009-10 |
| |
|
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
Sales |
17.2 |
11.7 |
29.3 |
31.8 |
9.5 |
1.9 |
-0.9 |
0.1 |
22.5 |
29.1 |
Other Income* |
6.6 |
6.3 |
-8.4 |
-0.6 |
-4.8 |
39.4 |
50.2 |
6.0 |
7.4 |
10.3 |
Expenditure |
19.5 |
9.6 |
33.5 |
37.5 |
12.6 |
-0.5 |
-4.4 |
-2.5 |
20.6 |
30.7 |
Depreciation provision |
17.4 |
22.2 |
15.3 |
16.5 |
16.8 |
19.6 |
21.5 |
20.7 |
21.6 |
20.1 |
Gross profits |
-4.2 |
24.9 |
11.9 |
8.7 |
-26.7 |
-8.8 |
5.8 |
10.9 |
60.0 |
36.7 |
Interest payments |
57.3 |
-3.2 |
58.1 |
85.3 |
62.9 |
36.5 |
3.7 |
-1.0 |
-12.3 |
-2.9 |
Profits after tax |
-18.4 |
28.8 |
6.9 |
-2.6 |
-53.4 |
-19.9 |
5.5 |
12.0 |
99.3 |
44.0 |
Select Ratios |
Change in Stock# to Sales |
0.4 |
1.0 |
2.9 |
2.2 |
-1.7 |
-1.8 |
0.6 |
2.3 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
Gross Profits to Sales |
13.3 |
14.8 |
14.5 |
13.5 |
11.0 |
13.7 |
15.7 |
14.9 |
14.3 |
14.6 |
Profits After Tax to Sales |
8.1 |
9.4 |
9.7 |
8.6 |
5.3 |
8.1 |
10.2 |
9.4 |
8.8 |
9.0 |
Interest to Sales |
3.1 |
2.7 |
2.4 |
2.9 |
3.8 |
3.2 |
2.8 |
3.1 |
2.7 |
2.4 |
Interest to Gross Profits |
23.6 |
18.2 |
16.8 |
21.5 |
34.6 |
23.3 |
18.0 |
20.5 |
19.1 |
16.6 |
Interest Coverage (Times) |
4.2 |
5.5 |
6.0 |
4.6 |
2.9 |
4.3 |
5.6 |
4.9 |
5.2 |
6.0 |
* : Other income excludes extraordinary income/expenditure if reported explicitly.
# : For companies reporting change in stock-in-trade explicitly.
Note: 1. Growth rates are year-on-year percentage changes for common set of companies.
2. Quarterly data may not add up to annual data due to differences in number and composition of sample covered in
each period. |
II.11 Sequentially, seasonally adjusted
sales recorded improvement in the first
three quarters of 2009-10, but decelerated
in the fourth quarter. Project finance data
from major banks/financial institutions suggested the improved strength in private
corporate sector’s investment intentions.
External Demand
II.12 Net exports (of goods and services,
at constant prices) contributed positively by
7.8 per cent to GDP growth in the demand
side during 2009-10, as against a negative
contribution of around 36.2 per cent in
2008-09. The positive contribution of net
exports, contrary to the normal trend in the
past, emanated from the relatively larger
decline in imports than exports during the
year. During the fourth quarter of 2009-10,
contribution of net exports increased further
as exports increased by 14.2 per cent, while
imports declined by 3.7 per cent (see Chart
II.2). Merchandise trade data for April-June
2010 suggest higher growth in imports than exports. Thus, the positive contribution of
net exports can be expected to reverse in
2010-11. A detailed discussion on the
external demand conditions is set out in
Chapter III.
II.13 To sum up, investment demand has
showed a robust turnaround, which is
expected to continue as suggested by the
production trends in capital goods, non-oil
imports and corporate profits. While
private consumption demand was subdued
in 2009-10, trends in corporate sales,
production of consumer durables and nondurables
and automobile sales point to
significant pick-up in private consumption
demand in recent months. The contribution
of net exports to aggregate demand,
however, will turn negative, reflecting
higher import demand.
1 Based on the budget documents of twenty-four State governments. |