House Price Index*
The Reserve Bank is compiling quarterly house price
indices for nine major cites (Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai,
Kolkata, Bengaluru, Lucknow, Ahmedabad, Jaipur and
Kanpur) as well as at all-India level based on the official
data received from registration authorities of respective
state governments on property transactions with base
Q4:2008-09=100. Overall trends in the house price index
(HPI) are regularly disseminated in the quarterly review
of Macroeconomic and Monetary Developments. This
article presents the methodology and salient features of the
Reserve Bank’s HPI, and its trends in recent quarters. It
is a weighted average Laspeyres index based on transaction
price, where transactions are stratified into three categories,
viz., small, medium and large houses and in different
geographical wards/zones. Further, the city-wise indices are
averaged using the population proportion to total as the
weight to obtain an all-India index. It is observed that the
annual average house price increase is around 20 per cent
in the last three years.
Introduction
House is not only an asset but also is a durable
consumption good for households, providing shelter
and other services. A change in the house price affects
the households’ perceived lifetime wealth and hence
influences the spending and borrowing decisions of
households. An increase in the house price raises the
value of the housing relative to construction costs;
hence a new construction is profitable when house
price raises above the construction costs. Residential
investment is, therefore, positively related with house
price increase. House prices may also affect bank
lending and vice versa. Further, house price gains
increase housing collateral. The potential two-way link
between bank lending and house prices give rise to
mutually reinforcing cycles in credit and real estate
markets. These indicate that house prices may affect
economic activity through private consumption of households, residential investment and credit allocation
of the financial systems.
The information on house price is not easily
accessible; the lack of transparency in the residential
property market and limited availability of price
information pose significant challenges for identifying
the nature of real estate price dynamics and their
relationship with financial stability and monetary
policy. Therefore, it is essential to have an accurate
measure of aggregate house price in order to understand
the behavior of housing markets and their influence
on the economy. In practice, development of an
aggregate house price index is difficult because of its
inherent heterogeneity and infrequent nature of sales.
This means houses vary in quality across sections and
over time. As no two houses are the same, the observed
difference in characteristic (quality) between two
houses will be reflected in difference in price. Also,
since transaction on any specific house occur relatively
infrequently, it is hard to know the amount at which a
specific house will transact on a particular day. Thus,
the characteristics of heterogeneity and infrequency of
sales together make it all the more difficult to find a
representative sample of house prices on which an
aggregate price index can be estimated. Internationally,
the house price index is compiled using three
methodologies. The first methodology is based on
simple average of observed prices. The second looks at
repeat sales of the same property. The third treats a
house as a bundle of attributes, each with its own price
that changes over time and makes use of the hedonic
methodology1.
2. Reserve Bank’s House Price Index
Beginning with Mumbai city, the Reserve Bank
initiated the work of compiling a house price index (HPI) in 2007 and brought out a quarterly HPI for
Mumbai city (base 2002-03=100) in the fourth quarter
review of Macroeconomic and Monetary Developments
2008-09. Over the quarters, the coverage has been
extended by incorporating eight more cities, viz., Delhi,
Chennai, Kolkata, Bengaluru, Lucknow, Ahmedabad,
Jaipur and Kanpur and the base is shifted to Q4:2008-
09=100. Trends in all-India HPI and its constituent
cities are disseminated regularly in the quarterly
Macroeconomic and Monetary Developments. Latest
results published by the Reserve Bank relate to Q4:
2011-12.
The price data on transacted houses while
registering of a house are collected from the Registration
Departments of respective state governments. This
approach attempts to develop a house price index on
the basis of registration price data and stratified
weighted average measures, where transactions are
stratified in three categories, viz., small, medium and
large houses and different geographical wards/zones.
However, this measure captures prices relating only to
those houses sold during a period and not relevant to
all houses in the economy.
3. Methodology for the Compilation of HPI
Registration of property is a legal and official
necessity for any property transaction in India.
Therefore, in principle, the official authority of property
registration has the details of all transactions during a
reference period. Registration authorities of respective
state governments possess the data on the registration
of transactions of properties including shops, land and
residential houses located in their judistriction. The
data are reported on transaction basis. For most centers,
basic information is available in local language. Even
though the data structure is not strictly common across
states, it contains the following fields: date of
registration, registration number, address, survey no,
area, seller’s name, buyer’s name, consideration
amount (transacted price) and market value. From this,
data related to residential occupancies is suitably
extracted and analysed for the compilation of house
price index. The house price index is compiled on a quarterly basis with Q4:2008-09=100 as the base. The
data on prices of residential properties are scrutinised
and unacceptable data points are removed using
z-scores2 calculated separately for each stratum in each
quarter. All the observations above/below plus/minus
3 z-scores are removed. Since the data do not include
the information on type of house, i.e., under construction
or new or resale house, the date of
registration is considered as date of sale of the house.
The analysis of data as well as compilation of the index
is done on the transacted price. While interpreting the
results, the fact may be taken into account that the
index is based on the price which is officially decleared
by the buyer.
The house price indices are calculated using
weighted average method. The sample data are
stratified/segregated in different dimensions reflecting
size, wards/zones for each city. First, the indices are
estimated at ward/zone level, which is averaged
(weighted) to obtain the city indices. An all-India level
weighted average house price index is also compiled
based on the nine city indices. The methodology for
computing the respective indices is described in detail
below.
Weighted Average Method
Compilation of weighted average price index is
done using Laspeyres weighted average methodology.
First, the simple average of price (per square meter) of
houses (Pij ) in each category, classified by Floor Space
Area (FSA) into small, medium and large for each ward/
zone in each quarter is calculated. As a method of
averaging, median is used. Second, the proportion of
number of houses transacted in the three categories of
FSA within a ward/zone during the period January 2009
– March 2009 is taken as the weight (wi,j ). Then, based
on an average per square meter price for three FSA
category houses in each ward/zone, price-relatives are
calculated for each quarter. The price relative is nothing but a ratio of current period price to the base period
price. Price relative per square meter for the ith FSA, jth
ward/zone, tth quarter is given by
The quarterly ward/zone weighted average price
relatives are calculated next. These weighted relative
prices are again averaged using proportion of number
of houses in each ward to the total number of houses
transacted in the city during the period January 2009
– March 2009 as the weight (Wj). The following formula
is used for compiling the city-wise HPI for the tth quarter.
The city-wise price indices are averaged using the
population proportion (based on 2011 census) of the
nine cities to its total to obtain the all-India index.
Table 1: House Price Index – City wise |
Quarter |
Mumbai |
Delhi |
Bengaluru |
Ahmedabad |
Lucknow |
Kolkata |
Chennai* |
Jaipur |
Kanpur |
Q4: 08-09 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Q1: 09-10 |
116.0 |
101.0 |
103.6 |
101.4 |
103.7 |
100.7 |
96.1 |
99.0 |
113.0 |
Q2: 09-10 |
131.0 |
100.9 |
101.7 |
104.2 |
118.6 |
107.2 |
83.9 |
112.7 |
114.8 |
Q3: 09-10 |
135.1 |
99.7 |
100.8 |
117.3 |
116.7 |
110.9 |
106.8 |
119.1 |
114.1 |
Q4: 09-10 |
136.4 |
109.5 |
98.5 |
124.3 |
112.5 |
107.5 |
118.2 |
142.5 |
120.2 |
Q1: 10-11 |
143.0 |
122.3 |
104.0 |
117.1 |
116.9 |
116.9 |
138.2 |
144.9 |
119.0 |
Q2: 10-11 |
157.2 |
116.1 |
101.9 |
128.5 |
128.5 |
156.2 |
135.7 |
149.7 |
129.4 |
Q3: 10-11 |
159.3 |
111.4 |
104.7 |
128.8 |
136.9 |
161.2 |
118.4 |
157.3 |
133.5 |
Q4: 10-11 |
172.3 |
135.2 |
113.6 |
128.7 |
140.3 |
171.9 |
106.8 |
155.3 |
135.7 |
Q1: 11-12 |
191.6 |
152.8 |
116.9 |
152.3 |
149.3 |
157.0 |
106.3 |
161.1 |
135.4 |
Q2: 11-12 |
206.1 |
153.0 |
116.0 |
162.8 |
159.2 |
159.0 |
113.9 |
165.1 |
138.3 |
Q3: 11-12 |
191.7 |
168.6 |
146.1 |
171.8 |
172.3 |
155.0 |
120.3 |
163.5 |
140.0 |
Q4: 11-12 |
224.7 |
195.3 |
140.6 |
177.2 |
169.7 |
158.4 |
117.0 |
164.4 |
148.7 |
Note: * Chennai Index is based on both residential and commercial properties. |
4. Trends in HPI
City-wise house price indices are presented in
Table 1. These indices track variation in house prices
in various cities across time.
The year-on-year variation in house prices across
various cities are presented in Table 2. The house price
in Mumbai increased on an annual basis at more than
15 per cent throughout the study period. In the cities
like Delhi, Bengaluru, Ahmedabad and Lucknow house
prices grew at a relativity lesser pace during 2010-11, which picked up in 2011-12. Kolkata, Chennai, Jaipur
and Kanpur saw some moderation in house price
increase in 2011-12 compared to 2010-11.
Table 2: House Price Index (y-o-y change in per cent) - City wise |
Quarter |
Mumbai |
Delhi |
Bengaluru |
Ahmedabad |
Lucknow |
Kolkata |
Chennai* |
Jaipur |
Kanpur |
Q4: 09-10 |
36.4 |
9.5 |
-1.5 |
24.3 |
12.5 |
7.5 |
18.2 |
42.5 |
20.2 |
Q1: 10-11 |
23.3 |
21.1 |
0.3 |
15.5 |
12.8 |
16.0 |
43.8 |
46.3 |
5.3 |
Q2: 10-11 |
20.0 |
15.0 |
0.3 |
23.4 |
8.4 |
45.7 |
61.7 |
32.8 |
12.7 |
Q3: 10-11 |
17.9 |
11.7 |
3.9 |
9.8 |
17.2 |
45.3 |
10.9 |
32.1 |
17.0 |
Q4: 10-11 |
26.3 |
23.4 |
15.4 |
3.5 |
24.7 |
59.9 |
-9.6 |
8.9 |
12.9 |
Q1: 11-12 |
33.9 |
25.0 |
12.4 |
30.0 |
27.8 |
34.3 |
-23.1 |
11.2 |
13.7 |
Q2: 11-12 |
31.1 |
31.8 |
13.8 |
26.6 |
23.9 |
1.8 |
-16.1 |
10.3 |
6.9 |
Q3: 11-12 |
20.3 |
51.4 |
39.6 |
33.4 |
25.9 |
-3.9 |
1.6 |
3.9 |
4.9 |
Q4: 11-12 |
30.4 |
44.4 |
23.7 |
37.7 |
21.0 |
-7.9 |
9.5 |
5.9 |
9.5 |
Note: * Chennai Index is based on both residential and commercial properties. |
Overall house price index and point-to-point
annual per cent price changes at all India level are
presented in Table 3. It is observed that index of house
price, during the past 3 years up to Q4:2011-12, has
increased by around 77 per cent. The year-on-year price
increase has been around 20 per cent throughout.
5. Limitations
The HPI based on registration prices has some
limitations. There is a perception that registration price
is not the actual price paid by a buyer. It is argued that
registered prices of houses are in general underestimated
due to various reasons like high registration fees and
stamp duty, obligations for the payment of property
tax, etc. Further, the differences in the time gaps
between the actual transactions and registrations also
do not always follow the similar pattern across different
states. Moreover, registrations of the properties are
done taking into account different criteria in different
states, some of which are (a) partial consideration of un-divided share of land, (b) partial consideration of
sale of terrace rights, (c) consideration of agreement to
sale at the time booking for total price, and (d) sale deed
only post completion of property. On the other hand,
the registration procedure and records maintenance
are not computerised in some states and the records
in most states are maintained in the regional languages
which necessitates further work with respect to
bringing them into common format.
Finally, the all-India HPI is a weighted average of
city-level HPIs. Ideally, the number of transactions at
city level could have been used as weight. However, in
the existing data collection mechanism, separate
information on the type of the property (residential/
commercial) of Chennai is not available. As a result,
the proportion of population of the city (to the total
population of nine cities together) is used as the weight,
as a proxy to the number of transactions.
Table 3: House Price Index and y-o-y change – All-India |
Quarter |
HPI |
y-o-y change (%) |
Q4: 08-09 |
100.0 |
NA |
Q1: 09-10 |
105.0 |
NA |
Q2: 09-10 |
109.5 |
NA |
Q3: 09-10 |
113.8 |
NA |
Q4: 09-10 |
118.5 |
18.5 |
Q1: 10-11 |
125.4 |
19.4 |
Q2: 10-11 |
132.6 |
21.1 |
Q3: 10-11 |
132.6 |
16.5 |
Q4: 10-11 |
141.7 |
19.6 |
Q1: 11-12 |
152.0 |
21.2 |
Q2: 11-12 |
157.8 |
19.0 |
Q3: 11-12 |
164.1 |
23.7 |
Q4: 11-12 |
176.9 |
24.8 |
6. Conclusion
Developing a house price index is always a
challenging task. The article presents the salient
features of Reserve Bank’s house price index based on
official data received from registration authorities of
various state governments. It is compiled at city as well
as at all-India level. The weighted average based
Laspeyres index number, which makes use of the
number of transactions, as the weight is used to compile
the indices at city level. The all-India index is estimated
using the population proportion as weight.
Recent trends of Reserve Bank’s HPI reveal that
increase in the house price index was steep in the last
few years. House price on an average during the past
3 years up to Q4:2011-12 has increased by 77 per cent.
The city of Mumbai has witnessed a sustained increase
in prices throughout the study period. Delhi, Bengaluru,
Ahmedabad and Lucknow house prices have shown
acceleration in prices during the latest periods.
|