Monetary transmission strengthened during Q4 of 2010-11 with interest rates firming up gradually
across the spectrum as liquidity remained in deficit mode. The policy transmission to deposit and
lending rates is visible in the current base rate regime. Asset prices, including property prices,
generally remained range bound. Equity markets experienced orderly correction in Q4 of 2010-11.
The rupee exhibited two-way movements against the US dollar without any intervention or active
capital account management. Going forward, the financial markets need to brace up to the geopolitical
risks in MENA, default risks in the Euro zone and movements in cross-border capital flows.
Global portfolio rebalancing to impact
domestic financial markets
V.1 The year 2010-11 was marked by periods
of volatility and tranquility in the Indian
financial markets. With global uncertainties
rising, volatility may aggravate further, partly
from building up of speculative positions in
global commodity markets. Portfolio choices
are also governed by the geopolitical
developments in the MENA region and
availability of easy liquidity in certain advanced
economies. An additional source of uncertainty
for the global financial markets is the sovereign
and banking sector default risks in parts of
Europe (Chart V.1a) There could, however, be
a rebalancing of investors’ portfolio if economic
recovery in major advanced economies gains
traction and causes a quicker-than-anticipated
withdrawal of monetary accommodation. With
rise in global equity markets (Chart V.1b) there
may be a shift in investors’ preference away from the EME markets to those of the advanced
economies, particularly the US.
V.2 While credit spreads shrank markedly
during Q4 of 2010-11, bond yields in advanced
economies firmed up reflecting the post-crisis
rise in debt to GDP ratio as well as incipient
signs of inflationary concerns. Apart from food
prices, the rising expectations of increased crude
oil prices following the geo-political risks in
MENA raised inflationary expectations
especially in EMEs. The initial reaction to the
downside risks associated with the natural
calamity hit Japanese economy has
subsequently given rise to the expectations of
boost in demand for its reconstruction.
Global uncertainties and anti-inflationary
monetary policy stance impacting Indian
markets, but orderly conditions prevail
V.3 Global uncertainties as well as domestic
developments impacted Indian financial markets. The Indian markets, however, remained largely
orderly, despite the challenges posed by persistent
inflation and high current account deficit.
V.4 Call rate firmed up in step with the policy
rates and remained above the upper bound of
the LAF corridor for a major part of Q4 of 2010-
11, due to frictions caused by skewed SLR
holdings (Chart V.2a). While issuances and rates
on certificates of deposits (CDs) continued to
increase during the quarter reflecting banks’
efforts to mobilise more funds, issuance of
commercial paper (CP) moderated on account
of the strong credit growth, even as the rates
continued to be high reflecting general liquidity
stress (Chart V.2b). The yield curve for
government securities (G-sec) further flattened
during Q4 in response to policy rate hike
expectations and liquidity tightness.
V.5 The Indian rupee appreciated moderately
against the US dollar. Stock markets remained
volatile for the greater part of Q4, weighed by
domestic and global concerns, but appreciated
towards the close of the quarter on the back of
strong foreign portfolio inflows. Returns in the
Indian equity markets were relatively lower than
most other EMEs (Table V.1). Prices in the
housing market continued the rising trend
during the third quarter of 2010-11.
Table V.1 : Stock Price Movements and PE Ratios in EMEs |
(Per cent) |
Stock Price Variations |
P/E Ratios |
Item |
End-March
2010@ |
End-March
2011@ |
End-March
2011* |
Item |
End-March
2010 |
End-Dec.
2010 |
End-March
2011 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
Indonesia (Jakarta Composite) |
93.7 |
32.5 |
-0.7 |
Indonesia (Jakarta Composite) |
13.6 |
20.9 |
18.5 |
Brazil (Bovespa) |
72.0 |
-2.5 |
-1.0 |
Brazil (Bovespa) |
16.4 |
13.9 |
11.6 |
Thailand (SET Composite) |
82.6 |
32.9 |
1.4 |
Thailand (SET Composite) |
12.4 |
15.2 |
14.0 |
India (BSE Sensex) |
80.5 |
10.9 |
-5.2 |
India (BSE Sensex) |
17.7 |
18.7 |
17.3 |
South Korea (KOSPI) |
40.3 |
24.4 |
2.7 |
South Korea (KOSPI) |
12.2 |
16.0 |
12.9 |
China (Shanghai Composite) |
31.0 |
-5.8 |
4.3 |
China (Shanghai Composite) |
23.1 |
16.1 |
16.6 |
Taiwan (Taiwan Index) |
52.0 |
9.6 |
-3.2 |
Taiwan (Taiwan Index) |
19.1 |
15.4 |
14.7 |
Russia (RTS) |
128.0 |
30.0 |
15.5 |
Russia (RTS) |
9.8 |
8.6 |
9.6 |
Malaysia (KLCI) |
51.4 |
17.0 |
1.7 |
Malaysia (KLCI) |
18.9 |
17.4 |
17.0 |
Singapore (Straits Times) |
69.9 |
7.6 |
-2.6 |
Singapore (Straits Times) |
13.4 |
11.3 |
10.9 |
@ : Year-on-year variation.
* : End-March 2011 over End-December 2010.
Source : Bloomberg. |
Money market rates reflect liquidity
conditions
V.6 The money market was generally orderly
although liquidity conditions remained in deficit
mode during the fourth quarter of 2010-11.
Reflecting the high credit demand, high
currency growth, and unspent surplus balance
in the government account as also the hikes in
policy rates by the Reserve Bank, the call rates
mostly remained above the repo rate during Q4
(Chart V.2a, Table V.2). The rates in the
collateralised segments also rose in line with
the trend in the call money market.
V.7 Transaction volumes in the collateralised
borrowing and lending obligation (CBLO) and
market repo segments were higher during Q4
than Q3 of 2010-11 (Table V.3). The
collateralised segment of the money market
remained predominant, accounting for more
than 80 per cent of the total volume of
transactions during 2010-11.
V.8 With strong credit growth not matched
by commensurate deposit growth, banks
increasingly financed their advances by raising
CDs at higher rates. During surplus liquidity
situations, when the CP rates are lower than the
Base Rates, corporates take greater recourse to
the CPs. They, however, prefer bank financing, once the CP rates rise above the Base Rate.
Leasing-finance and manufacturing companies
continue to be the major issuers of CPs
(Table V.4).
Table V.2 : Rates in Domestic Financial Markets |
|
Money Market |
Bond Market |
Forex Market |
Stock Market Indices |
Call Rate* (Per cent) |
Market Repo Rate (Non-LAF) (Per cent) |
CBLO
Rate
(Per cent) |
Comm-
ercial
Paper
WADR
(Per cent) |
Certifi-
cates of
Deposit
WAEIR
(Per cent) |
G-Sec
10-year
yield
(Per cent) |
Corporate
Bonds
Yield -
AAA 5-Yr
bond
(Per cent) |
Exchange
Rate
(`/US$) |
CNX
Nifty
** |
BSE
Sensex
** |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
Mar-10 |
3.51 |
3.32 |
3.15 |
6.29 |
6.07 |
7.94 |
8.61 |
45.50 |
5178 |
17303 |
Apr-10 |
3.49 |
3.04 |
2.95 |
5.37 |
5.56 |
8.01 |
8.37 |
44.50 |
5295 |
19679 |
May-10 |
3.83 |
3.79 |
3.67 |
6.85 |
5.17 |
7.56 |
8.15 |
45.81 |
5053 |
16845 |
Jun-10 |
5.16 |
5.29 |
5.21 |
6.82 |
6.37 |
7.59 |
8.21 |
46.57 |
5188 |
17300 |
Jul-10 |
5.54 |
5.37 |
5.25 |
6.93 |
6.69 |
7.69 |
8.27 |
46.84 |
5360 |
17848 |
Aug-10 |
5.17 |
5.12 |
5.01 |
7.32 |
7.17 |
7.93 |
8.52 |
46.57 |
5457 |
18177 |
Sep-10 |
5.50 |
5.35 |
5.24 |
7.82 |
7.34 |
7.96 |
8.52 |
46.06 |
5811 |
19353 |
Oct-10 |
6.39 |
5.96 |
5.88 |
12.15 |
7.67 |
7.68 |
8.58 |
44.41 |
6069 |
20250 |
Nov-10 |
6.81 |
6.42 |
6.14 |
12.22 |
8.16 |
8.03 |
8.64 |
45.02 |
6055 |
20126 |
Dec-10 |
6.67 |
6.27 |
6.20 |
10.10 |
9.15 |
8.03 |
8.89 |
45.16 |
5971 |
19228 |
Jan-11 |
6.54 |
6.21 |
6.20 |
8.81 |
9.42 |
8.15 |
9.05 |
45.39 |
5783 |
19289 |
Feb-11 |
6.69 |
6.45 |
6.43 |
9.05 |
10.04 |
8.12 |
9.25 |
45.44 |
5401 |
18037 |
Mar-11 |
7.15 |
6.56 |
6.46 |
10.40 |
9.96 |
8.00 |
9.23 |
44.99 |
5538 |
18457 |
*: Average of daily weighted call money rates. **: Average of daily closing indices.
WADR: Weighted Average Discount Rate. WAEIR: Weighted Average Effective Interest Rate. |
V.9 The primary yields on Treasury Bills
(TBs) firmed up during Q4 of 2010-11 in line
with the spike in short-term interest rates
(Table V.5).
V.10 Annualised volatility of one year interest
rate swaps increased during Q4 of 2010-11
(Chart V.3). This may reflect market uncertainties
on future short-term money market rates.
The yield curve responds to monetary actions
and lower budgeted borrowings
V.11 Responding to the persistently
high inflation and tightening liquidity
conditions, G-sec yields, both in the primary
and secondary markets, firmed up during
January 2011, but moderated thereafter.
A lower-than-expected fiscal deficit and
market borrowing programme for the
first half of 2011-12 improved market
sentiments. Yields eased in March 2011 in
response to announcement of auctioning of unutilised investment limits for FIIs for GSec
and corporate debt. The flattening
of yield curve despite inflationary pressures may
have been aided by policy rate hikes and
temporarily lower issuances (Chart V.4a).
Table V.3 : Average Daily Volumes in Domestic Financial Markets |
(` crore) |
|
Money Market |
Bond Market |
Forex
Market |
Stock
Market # |
LAF |
Call
Money |
Market
Repo |
CBLO |
Comm-
ercial
Paper * |
Certifi-
cates of
Deposit* |
G-Sec @ |
Corpor- rate Bond |
Inter-bank
(US$ mn) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
Mar-10 |
37,640 |
8,812 |
19,150 |
60,006 |
75,506 |
3,41,054 |
6,221 |
1598 |
16,378 |
9,191 |
Apr-10 |
57,150 |
8,187 |
20,319 |
50,891 |
98,769 |
3,36,807 |
10,682 |
1671 |
18,411 |
9,262 |
May-10 |
32,798 |
8,393 |
17,610 |
42,274 |
1,09,039 |
3,40,343 |
18,774 |
1653 |
20,122 |
8,836 |
Jun-10 |
-47,347 |
7,129 |
9,481 |
31,113 |
99,792 |
3,21,589 |
14,523 |
1236 |
18,476 |
8,605 |
Jul-10 |
-46,653 |
9,477 |
12,011 |
29,102 |
1,12,704 |
3,24,810 |
10,105 |
1450 |
17,126 |
8,443 |
Aug-10 |
-1,048 |
7,958 |
15,553 |
45,181 |
1,26,549 |
3,41,616 |
12,488 |
1146 |
18,476 |
9,656 |
Sep-10 |
-24,155 |
8,606 |
15,927 |
53,223 |
1,12,003 |
3,37,322 |
11,582 |
1254 |
18,787 |
10,446 |
Oct-10 |
-61,658 |
8,920 |
14,401 |
43,831 |
1,49,620 |
3,43,353 |
10,355 |
1151 |
25,053 |
11,404 |
Nov-10 |
-99,311 |
8,865 |
9,967 |
32,961 |
1,17,793 |
3,32,982 |
7,645 |
922 |
22,092 |
11,190 |
Dec-10 |
-1,20,495 |
9,436 |
12,989 |
43,784 |
82,542 |
3,61,408 |
6,939 |
830 |
17,737 |
8,574 |
Jan-11 |
-92,933 |
7,758 |
11,546 |
44,815 |
1,01,752 |
3,77,640 |
7,025 |
912 |
20,054 P |
8,430 |
Feb-11 |
-78,639 |
10,356 |
13,150 |
42,292 |
1,01,291 |
4,18,524 |
6,994 |
863 |
19,673 P |
8,011 |
Mar-11 |
-80,963 |
11,278 |
15,134 |
43,201 |
80,305 |
4,24,740 |
8,144 |
1314 |
22.211 P |
7,458 |
*: Outstanding position P: Provisional. #: Comprises volumes in BSE and NSE.
@: Average daily outright trading volume in Central Government dated securities.
Note: In col. 2 (-) ve indicates injection of liquidity while (+) ve indicates absorption of liquidity. |
V.12 In the primary market, investors’
sentiment remained positive, as reflected in the
sustained bid-cover ratio, which stood in the range of 1.39-3.87 during the year and 1.69-3.25
during the fourth quarter. More long dated
securities were issued to take advantage of the
yield curve movements (Table V.6). The spreads
on five-year corporate bonds over the
corresponding government bond yield widened
during the fourth quarter of 2010-11 on the back
of tight liquidity conditions (Chart V.4b).
Table V.4 : Major Issuers of Commercial Paper |
(` crore) |
End of Period |
Leasing and Finance |
Manufacturing |
Financial Institutions |
Total
Outstanding |
Amount |
Share (%) |
Amount |
Share(%) |
Amount |
Share(%) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
Mar-09 |
27,183 |
62 |
12,738 |
29 |
4,250 |
9 |
44,171 |
Jun-09 |
34,437 |
50 |
23,454 |
34 |
10,830 |
16 |
68,721 |
Sep-09 |
31,648 |
40 |
31,509 |
40 |
16,071 |
20 |
79,228 |
Dec-09 |
36,027 |
40 |
42,443 |
47 |
11,835 |
13 |
90,305 |
Mar-10 |
39,477 |
52 |
22,344 |
30 |
13,685 |
18 |
75,506 |
Jun-10 |
42,572 |
43 |
43330 |
43 |
13,890 |
14 |
99,792 |
Aug-10 |
57,161 |
45 |
55,933 |
44 |
13,455 |
11 |
1,26,549 |
Sep-10 |
58,098 |
52 |
40,485 |
36 |
13,420 |
12 |
1,12,003 |
Oct-10 |
80,306 |
54 |
54,894 |
37 |
14,420 |
9 |
1,49,620 |
Nov-10 |
58,871 |
50 |
45,457 |
39 |
13,465 |
11 |
1,17,793 |
Dec-10 |
49,282 |
60 |
24,960 |
30 |
8,300 |
10 |
82,542 |
Jan-11 |
55,591 |
55 |
35,601 |
35 |
10,560 |
10 |
1,01,752 |
Feb-11 |
51,339 |
51 |
40,262 |
39 |
9,690 |
10 |
1,01,291 |
Mar-11 |
46,350 |
58 |
22,695 |
28 |
11,260 |
14 |
80,305 |
Table V.5 : Treasury Bills in the Primary Market |
Year/
Month |
Notified Amount
(` crore) |
Average Implicit Yield at Minimum Cut-off Price (Per cent) |
91-day |
182-day |
364-day |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2009-10 |
3,80,000 |
3.57 |
3.97 |
4.38 |
2010-11 |
3,03,000 |
6.04 |
6.47 |
6.66 |
Apr-10 |
36,000 |
4.14 |
4.64 |
5.07 |
May-10 |
36,000 |
4.39 |
4.76 |
4.92 |
Jun-10 |
12,000 |
5.29 |
5.31 |
5.41 |
Jul-10 |
16,000 |
5.51 |
5.86 |
5.88 |
Aug-10 |
33,000 |
6.15 |
6.41 |
6.48 |
Sep-10 |
13,000 |
6.11 |
6.41 |
6.59 |
Oct-10 |
26,500 |
6.57 |
6.82 |
6.97 |
Nov-10 |
24,000 |
6.82 |
7.15 |
7.14 |
Dec-10 |
19,000 |
7.14 |
7.29 |
7.37 |
Jan-11 |
21,000 |
7.17 |
7.37 |
7.55 |
Feb-11 |
29,500 |
7.15 |
7.51 |
7.68 |
Mar-11 |
37,000 |
7.23 |
7.49 |
7.61 |
V.13 Interest Rate Futures (IRF) on 91-day TBs
were permitted by the Reserve Bank in March
2011. These futures will be cash settled with
the final settlement price based on the weighted
average price/yield obtained in the weekly
auctions on the date of expiry of the contract.
This is likely to enhance liquidity and also to
provide more options for the financial markets
to hedge interest rate risks through exchanges.
Deposit and lending rates transmit the anti-inflationary
policy stance
V.14 Stronger transmission is evident as banks
continued to increase both the lending rates and
deposit rates across maturity spectrums. Deposit
rates have risen rapidly to accommodate fast
rise in credit and to offset the tight liquidity environment during 2010-11. Scheduled
commercial banks (SCBs) raised their deposit
rates in the range of 25-500 basis points between
end-March 2010 and end-March 2011 across
maturities. The deposit rates for 1-3 years
maturity increased by 50-125 basis points
during the fourth quarter (Table V.7). Several
banks reviewed and increased their base rates
by 75-125 basis points between July 2010
and March 2011. Base rates of 64 major
banks with a credit share of around 98 per cent
ruled in the range of 8.0-9.5 per cent in March
2011, reflecting greater convergence since
base rates became operational effective
July 1, 2010.
Exchange rate remains orderly and
flexible
V.15 The rupee remained stable during the
fourth quarter of 2010-11, without any intervention or active capital account
management. It exhibited two-way movement
against major international currencies except
Euro. There was a modest appreciation against
the US dollar since mid-February 2011 (Chart
V.5a). While the turnover in inter-bank segment
of the foreign exchange market remained
volatile, the turnover in the merchant segment
increased in Q4 of 2010-11.
Table V.6 : Issuances of Central and State Government Dated Securities |
Item |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Central Government |
|
|
Gross amount raised (` crore) |
4,51,000* |
4,37,000 |
Devolvement on Primary Dealers (` crore) |
7,219 |
5,772 |
Bid-cover ratio (Range) |
1.4-4.3 |
1.4-3.9 |
Weighted average maturity (years) |
11.2 |
11.6 |
Weighted average yield (per cent) |
7.2 |
7.9 |
State Governments |
|
|
Gross amount raised (` crore) |
1,31,122 |
1,04,039 |
Cut-off yield (Per cent) |
7.0-8.6 |
8.1-8.6 |
Weighted average yield (per cent) |
8.1 |
8.4 |
* : Inclusive of MSS desequestering of ` 33,000 crore. |
V.16 Volumes in the exchange traded currency
derivatives increased during Q4 of 2010-11
(Chart V.5b). The growth in volumes
particularly for currency futures and options
has been supported by retail participation and
companies. In fact, the monthly trend of turnover in OTC forwards and swap involving
rupee remained sluggish during this period.
While turnover in the merchant segment
decreased from USD 93 billion in October
2010 to USD 64 billion in March 2011 (up to
March 25), the turnover in the interbank
segment declined from USD 418 billion
to USD 367 billion for the corresponding
period.
Equity markets underperform, remain
volatile
V.17 Reflecting several macroeconomic
uncertainties, Indian equity markets
underachieved and remained volatile during Q4
of 2010-11. Markets lost much of the valuation
gains made during the last four months of 2010,
when they outperformed most of the
international markets. During Q4 of 2010-11,
the BSE Sensex has been the worst performer
amongst the major equity indices. Slowdown of net equity investment by
the FIIs in India largely contributed to the
decline (Chart V.6a). In terms of the coefficient
of variation, the volatility of Sensex between
end-December 2010 and end-March 2011 at
3.95 per cent is much higher than the 2.0 per
cent of the MSCI emerging market index and
1.9 per cent of the MSCI world index. The
equity derivatives segment had gone up substantially over the year and currently
constitutes almost 90 per cent of the overall
investments. FII investments accounted for 19.8
per cent of the total investments in derivatives
(Chart V.6b)
Table V.7 : Deposit and Lending Rates of Banks |
(Per cent) |
|
Sep-10 |
Dec-10 |
Mar-11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1. |
Domestic Deposit Rate (1-3 years tenor) |
|
|
|
|
a. Public Sector Banks |
6.75-7.75 |
7.00-8.50 |
8.00-9.75 |
|
b. Private Sector Banks |
6.50-8.25 |
7.25-9.00 |
7.75-10.10 |
|
c. Foreign Banks |
3.00-8.00 |
3.50-8.50 |
3.50-9.10 |
2. |
Base Rate |
|
|
|
|
a. Public Sector Banks |
7.50-8.25 |
7.60-9.00 |
8.25-9.50 |
|
b. Private Sector Banks |
7.00-8.75 |
7.00-9.00 |
8.25-10.00 |
|
c. Foreign Banks |
5.50-9.00 |
5.50-9.00 |
6.25-9.50 |
3. |
Median Lending Rate* |
|
|
|
|
a. Public Sector Banks |
7.75-13.50 |
8.75-13.50 |
- |
|
b. Private Sector Banks |
8.00-15.00 |
8.25-14.50 |
- |
|
c. Foreign Banks |
7.25-13.00 |
8.00-14.50 |
- |
* : Median range of interest rates at which at least 60 per cent of business has been contracted. |
|
V.18 The activity in the primary segment of the
domestic capital market remained buoyant
during the first three quarters of 2010-11, but
moderated during Q4. However, resources
raised through public issuances were higher
during 2010-11 than the previous year
(Table V.9). During the year, resource
mobilisation by mutual funds turned negative,
owing to high volatility in the market, surfacing
of risks in the real sector, lower retail
investments possibly on account of higher
returns on competing instruments (bank
deposits in particular) and also due to lower
corporate support to the MFs.
Asset price concerns remain as housing
prices remain firm
V.19 Property prices continued to rise in most
cities during Q3 of 2010-11, as reflected in the
Reserve Bank’s Quarterly House Price Index
(HPI) based on data in respect of seven cities
collected from the Department of Registration
and Stamps (DRS) of the respective State
Governments. However, the indices for Delhi
and Chennai witnessed a decline during this
period (Chart V.7).
Macro-factors may determine financial
market movements ahead
V.20 Going forward, macroeconomic factors
may dominate financial markets movements in
2011-12. Macro-risks are large and uncertainty
abounds on how they might play out. Global
commodity markets are witnessing firming up of prices. Even though several hedge funds have
booked profits in the global commodity markets
in mid-March 2011 following the Japan
earthquake, a fresh wave of speculation has
arisen immediately after profit-booking as a
result of MENA region event risk.
Table V.8 : Key Stock Market Indicators |
Indicator |
BSE Sensex |
NSE Nifty |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1. |
BSE Sensex/S&PCNX Nifty |
|
|
|
|
|
(i) End-period |
17527.77 |
19445.22 |
5249.1 |
5833.75 |
|
(ii) Average |
15585.2 |
18605.18 |
4657.76 |
5583.54 |
2. |
Coefficient of Variation |
11.88 |
6.32 |
11.33 |
6.4 |
3. |
Price-Earning Ratio @ |
21.32 |
21.15 |
22.33 |
22.14 |
4. |
Price-Book Value Ratio |
3.9 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
5. |
Market Capitalisation to GDP Ratio (per cent)@ |
98.9 |
86.8 |
96.4 |
85.1 |
@: As at end-period.
Source : Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (BSE) and National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE). |
|
V.21 Domestic debt markets are likely to be
conditioned by evolving fiscal and monetary
policy considerations as well as possible
hardening of global yields. However, the path
of fiscal consolidation embarked upon by the
Government could help to ease the pressure
on long-term bond yields in the G-Sec
market, if inflationary expectations are reined
in. Sustained growth momentum could,
however, continue to exert pressure on interest
rates through high demand for credit. The risk
of volatile portfolio flows impacting
asset prices and exchange rate remains in the
face of growing uncertainties in the global
markets. The expected change in operating
procedures could help improve the
transmission of monetary policy on an
enduring basis, enabling interest rate channel
to work better.
Table V.9 : Resource Mobilisation from Capital Market |
(` crore) |
Category |
2008-09 |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
A. Prospectus and Rights Issues* |
14,671 |
32,607 |
37,620 |
1. Private Sector (a+b) |
14,671 |
25,479 |
24,373 |
a) Financial |
466 |
326 |
3,877 |
b) Non-financial |
14,205 |
25,153 |
20,496 |
2. Public Sector |
0 |
7,128 |
13,247 |
B. Euro Issues |
4,788 |
15,967 |
9,441 |
C. Mutual Fund Mobilisation(net)@ |
-28,296 |
83,080 |
-49,406 |
1. Private Sector |
-34,017 |
54,928 |
-19,215 |
2. Public Sector # |
5,721 |
28,152 |
-30,191 |
* Excluding offer for sale. @: Net of redemptions. #: Including UTI Mutual fund.
Source: Mutual Fund data are sourced from SEBI and exclude funds mobilised under Fund of Funds Schemes. |
|