Click here to Visit the RBI’s new website

Tenders Awarded

Tender numberRBI/Jaipur/HRMD/29/19-20/ET/125
Date of publication of NITSep 26, 2019
Nature of workAMC of Catering, Housekeeping and Maintenance services at VOF/THH, Jaipur
Mode of tender enquiryTender invited from open market through advertisement in newspaper, uploading in RBI website and MSTC portal
Type of bidding (single/two bid system)Two Bid System
Last date of receipt of tenderOct 17, 2019
Number of tenders received17 (Seventeen)
Nos. and names of parties qualified after technical evaluation 09 (Nine)
a) Prerna Enterprises
b) Rashmi Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd.
c) M/s Paradise Enterprise
d) Anandmal Manoj Kumar
e) Pankaj Security Services
f) Tiwari and Co.
g) Talented India
h) Cherish Hospitality Services India Pvt. Ltd.
i) M/s Ramesh Chand Sahu Caterers
Nos. and names of parties not qualified after technical evaluation 08 (Eight)
a) M/s Vanity Hospitality Services
b) M/s SLE Hospitality Management Services
c) Prabhat Caterers
d) Suvidha Services
e) M/s R P Pandey
f) Shree Maya
g) Ms/ AROS
h) M/s Rajendra Bhamishra
Commercial Bid Ranking, if any1) Prerna Enterprises
2) Rashmi Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd.
3) M/s Paradise Enterprise
4) Anandmal Manoj Kumar
5) Pankaj Security Services
6) Tiwari and Co.
7) Talented India
8) Cherish Hospitality Services India Pvt. Ltd.
9) M/s Ramesh Chand Sahu Caterers
Final Ranking, if anyPrerna Enterprises (bid not considered)
Rashmi Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd. (bid not considered)
1) M/s Paradise Enterprise
2) Anandmal Manoj Kumar
3) Pankaj Security Services
4) Tiwari and Co.
5) Talented India
6) Cherish Hospitality Services India Pvt. Ltd.
7) M/s Ramesh Chand Sahu Caterers
Whether contract awarded to lowest tenderer/evaluated L1Yes
Contract number and dateN.A.
Name of contractorM/s Paradise Enterprise
Value of contract₹. 34,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Four lakhs)
Scheduled date of completion of supplies 01-01-20120 to 31-12-2020
Actual date of start of workJan 01, 2020
Actual date of completion of workDec 31, 2020
Reasons for delay, if anyTwo participants have quoted the rates less than the minimum wage payable. The office sought clarifications from them and after scrutiny, bids received from these firm/company were not considered. Clarification was also sought from the third firm which quoted the rate equal to the minimum wage to be paid and after satisfactory justification, the work was allotted to this firm.
Top